The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact
Abstract
A new off-line procedure for dealing with ocular artifacts in ERP recording is described. The procedure (EMCP) uses EOG and EEG records for individual trials in an experimental session to estimate a propagation factor which describes the relationship between the EOG and EEG traces. The propagation factor is computed after stimulus-linked variability in both traces has been removed. Different propagation factors are computed for blinks and eye movements. Tests are presented which demonstrate the validity and reliability of the procedure. ERPs derived from trials corrected by EMCP are more similar to a 'true' ERP than are ERPs derived from either uncorrected or randomly corrected trials. The procedure also reduces the difference between ERPs which are based on trials with different degrees of EOG variance. Furthermore, variability at each time point, across trials, is reduced following correction. The propagation factor decreases from frontal to parietal electrodes, and is larger for saccades than blinks. It is more consistent within experimental sessions than between sessions. The major advantage of the procedure is that it permits retention of all trials in an ERP experiment, irrespective of ocular artifact. Thus, studies of populations characterized by a high degree of artifact, and those requiring eye movements as part of the experimental task, are made possible. Furthermore, there is no need to require subjects to restrict eye movement activity. In comparison to procedures suggested by others, EMCP also has the advantage that separate correction factors are computed for blinks and movements and that these factors are based on data from the experimental session itself rather than from a separate calibration session.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The epochs were corrected for eye-movement artefacts, using the technique described in (Gratton et al., 1983), and any epoch with a signal exceeding a peak-to-peak amplitude of 200 µV for any channel was excluded.”
From Neurophysiological evidence of efference copies to inner speech (2017) · cites this paper as Gratton et al., 1983
In the citing paper
“ERN and CRN standardized residual scores (ERNresid and CRNresid) were calculated based on measuring the variance leftover in a regression equation in which one score is modeled as a predictor of another score, because they may be preferable to subtraction-based difference scores in separating error processing from response monitoring [22, 40].”
From Altered Error Monitoring and Decreased Flanker Task Accuracy in Pediatric Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“The ΔERN is correlated both with the ERN and CRN and is therefore not an independent measure of either ERP [40].”
From Altered Error Monitoring and Decreased Flanker Task Accuracy in Pediatric Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Segments with eye movements and blinks were kept and corrected, adopting the standard Gratton and Coles procedure (Gratton et al., 1983).”
From Error and feedback processing in children with ADHD and children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder: An EEG event-related potential study (2008) · cites this paper as Gratton et al., 1983
Citations
Cites
Preparatory states and processes
Underwood, G. (1986) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(86)90015-3 · Cited by 462
“P300” and memory: Individual differences in the von Restorff effect
Karis, D., Fabiani, M., & Donchin, E. (1984) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(84)90007-0 · Cited by 425
Self-citationAttention, Voluntary Contraction and Event‐Related Cerebral Potentials
Lesser, R. P. (1978) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.28.7.739-a · Cited by 267
Eye movement artifact in the CNV
Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1970) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(70)90185-9 · Cited by 210
Attention, Voluntary Contraction and Event-Related Cerebral Potentials
Desmedt, J. E. (1977) · Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) · Cited by 205
Verleger, R., Gasser, T., & Möcks, J. (1982) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1982.tb02509.x · Cited by 193
Mowrer, O. H., Ruch, T. C., & Miller, N. E. (1935) · American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content · doi:10.1152/ajplegacy.1935.114.2.423 · Cited by 145
Physiology of the Human Eye and Visual System
Carr, R. E. (1980) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/0002-9394(80)90140-3 · Cited by 110
Differential Contributions of Blinks and Vertical Eye Movements as Artifacts in EEG Recording
Corby, J. C., & Kopell, B. S. (1972) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1972.tb00776.x · Cited by 106
Variations in Reflex Blink-Rate during Visual-Motor Tasks
Drew, G. C. (1951) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470215108416776 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,088
Hemispheric Organization of Visual Memories
Gratton, G., Corballis, P. M., & Jain, S. (1997) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.1.92 · Cited by 80
Self-citationGolob, E. J., & Starr, A. (2000) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00332-1 · Cited by 78
Praamstra, P., & Oostenveld, R. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00286-0 · Cited by 76
Wieser, M. J., Mühlberger, A., Alpers, G. W., Macht, M. L., Ellgring, H., & Pauli, P. (2005) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.09.009 · Cited by 78
“The raw EEG epochs were corrected for eye movements (Gratton et al., 1983), and trials on which a transition threshold of 100 mV (sample to sample) was exceeded, were excluded from the analyses.”
Direct Evidence for Cortical Suppression of Somatosensory Afferents during Visuomotor Adaptation
Bernier, P., Burle, B., Vidal, F., Hasbroucq, T., & Blouin, J. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn233 · Cited by 86
“Ocular artifacts were subtracted using the statistical method of Gratton et al. (1983) as implemented in the Brain Vision Analyzer software (Brain Products GmbH; Gilching, Germany).”
MethodForsyth, J. K., Bachman, P., Mathalon, D. H., Roach, B. J., & Asarnow, R. F. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1509262112 · Cited by 80
Nelson, C. A., Wewerka, S. S., Borscheid, A. J., deRegnier, R.-A. O., & Georgieff, M. (2003) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1067/mpd.2003.210 · Cited by 78
Event-related brain potentials in the study of language: An introduction
Garnsey, S. M. (1993) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969308407581 · Cited by 78
Sex differences in electrophysiological indices of conflict monitoring
Clayson, P. E., Clawson, A., & Larson, M. J. (2011) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.03.011 · Cited by 90
“Eye movement and blink artifacts were corrected using the algorithm described by Gratton et al. (1983).”
MethodAutomatic Temporal Expectancy: A High-Density Event-Related Potential Study
Mento, G., Tarantino, V., Sarlo, M., & Bisiacchi, P. S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062896 · Cited by 76
“The remaining EEG epochs contaminated by eye-blinks were corrected using Gratton’s algorithm [48] and re-referenced to the average of all electrodes.”
MethodThe Brain Network of Expectancy and Uncertainty Processing
Catena, A., Perales, J. C., Megías‐Robles, A., Cândido, A., Jara, E., & Maldonado, A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040252 · Cited by 83
“These SPN-Outcome and SPN-Payoff epochs were corrected for ocular artifacts using the Gratton-Coles algorithm [24].”
MethodThematic role assignment in patients with Broca's aphasia: Sentence–picture matching electrified
Wassenaar, M., & Peter Hagoort, A. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.016 · Cited by 77
Olfers, K. J. F., & Band, G. P. H. (2017) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0933-z · Cited by 88
“Ocular artifacts were corrected using the regression approach (Gratton, Coles, & Donchin, 1983).”
MethodClements, G. M., Bowie, D. C., Gyurkovics, M., Low, K. A., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.621620 · Cited by 77
“Ocular artifacts were corrected using the procedure described in Gratton et al. (1983).”
MethodSelf-citationNelson, B. D., Hajcak, G., & Shankman, S. A. (2015) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12418 · Cited by 77
“, 1998), and the scalp distribution of the probe N100 (frontocentral, maximal at FCz) make it unlikely that this was due to eye blink artifacts, which tend to be more frontal (Gratton et al., 1983).”
BackgroundShow me the Money: The impact of actual rewards and losses on the feedback negativity
Weinberg, A., Riesel, A., & Hajcak, G. (2014) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2014.03.015 · Cited by 84
“Offline, all data were analyzed in Brain Vision Analyzer (BVA) and were referenced to the average of the left and right mastoids, and band-pass filtered with low and high cutoffs of 0.1 and 30 Hz, respectively; eye-blink and ocular corrections were conducted per Gratton, Coles, and Donchin (1983).”
MethodInfluentialLatent inhibition mediates N1 attenuation to repeating sounds
Sable, J. J., Low, K. A., Maclin, E. L., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2004) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00192.x · Cited by 83
Self-citationDEBRUIJN, E., Grootens, K. P., Verkes, R. J., Buchholz, V. N., Hummelen, J. W., & Hulstijn, W. (2005) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.09.004 · Cited by 77
“EOG artifact correction was carried out using the procedure proposed by Gratton et al. (1983).”
MethodNeural Correlates of Belief- and Desire-Reasoning
Liu, D. S., Meltzoff, A. N., & Wellman, H. M. (2009) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01323.x · Cited by 77
“EEG data were then corrected for eye-blink and eye-movement artifacts using the Gratton, Coles, and Donchin (1983) algorithm.”
MethodNeural Correlates of Human and Monkey Face Processing in 9‐Month‐Old Infants
Scott, L. S., Shannon, R. W., & Nelson, C. A. (2006) · Infancy · doi:10.1207/s15327078in1002_4 · Cited by 77
Burgio-Murphy, A., Klorman, R., Shaywitz, S. E., Fletcher, J. M., Marchione, K. E., Holahan, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Thatcher, J. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2006) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.12.003 · Cited by 77
Decoupling beliefs from reality in the brain: an ERP study of theory of mind
Liu, D. S., Sabbagh, M. A., Gehring, W. J., & Wellman, H. M. (2004) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200404290-00012 · Cited by 77
“Visual inspection of the waveforms suggests that a late divergence between reality and think waveforms peaked, as in Sabbagh and Taylor’s [19] ERP study, around 800ms post-stimulus.”
ResultKessel, E. M., Kujawa, A., Hajcak, G., & Klein, D. N. (2014) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12355 · Cited by 79
Fisher, D. J., Labelle, A., & Knott, V. (2012) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2012.06.004 · Cited by 76
“…100 ms pre-stimulus) were corrected for residual eye movement and eye blink activity using an algorithm operating in the time and frequency domain (Gratton et al., 1983) and then baseline corrected using a 100 ms window of prestimulus electrical activity; any epochs with EEG or EOG voltages…”
MethodAssociation with positive outcome induces early effects in event-related brain potentials
Schacht, A., Adler, N., Chen, P., Guo, T., & Sommer, W. (2011) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.001 · Cited by 77
Cortisol administration enhances the coupling of midfrontal delta and beta oscillations
van Peer, J. M. (2007) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.11.001 · Cited by 77
“Rough artifact rejection (+/−200 μV), followed by automatic ocular correction using a standard procedure (Gratton et al., 1983) and automatic artifact rejection (+/−100 μV, lowest allowed activity 0.5 μV for 100 ms) were performed on these segments.”
MethodInfluentialCroce, P., Zappasodi, F., Marzetti, L., Merla, A., Pizzella, V., & Chiarelli, A. M. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2018.2889512 · Cited by 78
“We here name: adaptive filtering [4], Wiener filtering [5], Bayes filtering [6], regression [7], electrooculogram correction”
MethodAbnormal visual event-related potentials of autistic children
Verbaten, M. N., Roelofs, J. W., van Engeland, H., Kenemans, J. L., & Slangen, J. L. (1991) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02206870 · Cited by 79
“This technique is essentially the same as the one described by Gratton, Coles, & Donchin (1983) and Gasser, Sroka, & Mocks (1985).”
Methodde JONG, M. C., van ENGELAND, H., & KEMNER, C. (2008) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e31816429a6 · Cited by 76
Mapping Brain Activity During Loss of Situation Awareness
Catherwood, D., Edgar, G. K., Nikolla, D., Alford, C., Brookes, D. A., Baker, S., & White, S. (2014) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720814537070 · Cited by 79
Miller, A. E., Watson, J. M., & Strayer, D. L. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0026595 · Cited by 74
Ruchsow, M., Grön, G., Kiefer, M., Beschoner, P., Hermle, L., Ebert, D., & Falkenstein, M. (2008) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.01.010 · Cited by 76
“Ocular artifacts were corrected by using a method proposed by Gratton et al. (1983).”
MethodERP correlates of error monitoring in adult ADHD
Wiersema, J. R., van der Meere, J. J., & Roeyers, H. (2008) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-008-0165-x · Cited by 79
“EEG was corrected for horizontal and vertical eye movements using the Gratton and Coles algorithm (Gratton et al. 1983), as implemented in Vision Analyzer (version 1.05).”
MethodInfluentialMeyer, A., Hajcak, G., Bufferd, S. J., Kujawa, A., Laptook, R. S., Torpey, D. C., & Klein, D. N. (2014) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-014-9918-1 · Cited by 81
“Data was then corrected for eye-movements and blinks (Gratton et al. 1983) and artifacts were rejected if any of the following criteria were met: a voltage step of more than 50 microvolts between data points, a voltage difference of 300 microvolts within a single trial, or a voltage difference of…”
MethodvMMN for schematic faces: automatic detection of change in emotional expression
Kreegipuu, K., Põldver, N., Sibolt, O., Toom, M., Allïk, J., & Näätänen, R. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00714 · Cited by 76
Driving performance and EEG fluctuations during on-the-road driving following sleep deprivation
Perrier, J., Jongen, S., Vuurman, E. F. P. M., Bocca, M., Ramaekers, J. G., & Vermeeren, A. (2016) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.09.010 · Cited by 76
Friedman, D., Ritter, W., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1996) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00041-0 · Cited by 76
Carrasco, M., Hong, C., Nienhuis, J. K., Harbin, S. M., Fitzgerald, K. D., Gehring, W. J., & Hanna, G. L. (2013) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2013.02.017 · Cited by 74
“Ocular movement artifacts were then corrected using a standard algorithm [11].”
MethodAutomatic removal of eye movement artifacts from the EEG using ICA and the dipole model
Zhou, W., & Gotman, J. (2009) · Progress in Natural Science Materials International · doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.11.013 · Cited by 75
“Other methods have proposed the recoding of horizontal and vertical EOG with electrodes around the eye, and then the subtraction of an optimal linear combination of the horizontal and vertical EOG from the various EEG channels affected by artifact [21].”
Methodvan Dongen, N. N. N., Strien, J. W. V., & Katinka Dijkstra, B. (2016) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.06.003 · Cited by 74
“Correction for ocular artifacts was done using the Gratton, Coles, and Donchin (1983) algorithm.”
Zhang, M., Zhou, H., Liu, L., Feng, L., Yang, J., Wang, G., & Zhong, N. (2018) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2018.01.017 · Cited by 75
Qi, M.-M., & Gao, H.-M. (2020) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13521 · Cited by 63
van Meel, C. S., Heslenfeld, D. J., Oosterlaan, J., Luman, M., & Sergeant, J. A. (2011) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02352.x · Cited by 78
“After additional offline filtering, (bandpass: 0.01–25 Hz, 12 dB/oct), EEG data was corrected for vertical ocular artefact using the algorithm by Gratton, Coles, and Donchin (1983).”
MethodInfluentialUnconscious manipulation of free choice in humans
Kiesel, A., Wagener, A., Kunde, W., Hoffmann, J., Fallgatter, A. J., & Stöcker, C. (2005) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.10.002 · Cited by 74
“Epochs containing eye movements were corrected using the regression procedure of Gratton, Coles, and Donchin (1983) , which is implemented in the Brain Vision Analyzer Software.”
Thalamocingulate Interactions In Performance Monitoring
Seifert, S., von Cramon, D. Y., Imperati, D., Tittgemeyer, M., & Ullsperger, M. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6242-10.2011 · Cited by 78
“Second, horizontal and vertical EOG artifacts present in the EEG signal were corrected by an eye-movement correction procedure, based on a linear regression method as described previously (Gratton et al., 1983).”
MethodCarrillo‐de‐la‐Peña, M. T., Galdo‐Álvarez, S., & Lastra‐Barreira, C. (2008) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.089 · Cited by 73
Deficient multisensory integration in schizophrenia: An event-related potential study
Stekelenburg, J. J., Maes, J. P., Gool, A. R. V., Sitskoorn, M. M., & Vroomen, J. (2013) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.04.038 · Cited by 74
“After EOG correction (Gratton et al., 1983), epochswith an amplitude change exceeding±100 μV at any EEG channel were rejected.”
Baldauf, D., & Deubel, H. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21021 · Cited by 79
“We corrected the ERPs for these residual eye movements by applying the algorithm of Gratton, Coles, and Donchin ( 1983 ), which computes propagation factors that characterize the relationship between EOG and EEG traces.”
MethodEffects of stimulus–response compatibility on inhibitory processes in Parkinson’s disease
Beste, C., Dziobek, I., Hielscher, H., Willemssen, R., & Falkenstein, M. (2009) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06621.x · Cited by 76
“Horizontal and vertical eye movements preserved in the accepted trials were corrected by means of a linear regression method for EOG correction (Gratton et al., 1983).”
Cortisol involvement in mechanisms of behavioral inhibition
Tops, M., & Boksem, M. A. S. (2010) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01131.x · Cited by 77
Altered Dynamic of EEG Oscillations in Fibromyalgia Patients at Rest
González‐Roldán, A. M., Cifré, I., Sitges, C., & Montoya, P. (2016) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnw023 · Cited by 80
Cognitive bias and emotion in neuropsychological models of depression
Deldin, P. J., Keller, J., Gergen, J. A., & Miller, G. A. (2001) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930143000248 · Cited by 81
Symptom profile and “gamma” processing in schizophrenia
Gordon, E., Williams, L. M., Haig, A. R., Wright, J., & Meares, R. A. (2001) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546800042000016 · Cited by 75
“system was employed and data was EOG corrected offline (Gratton et al., 1983).”
MethodPlacebos without deception reduce self-report and neural measures of emotional distress
Guevarra, D. A., Moser, J. S., Wager, T. D., & Kross, E. F. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17654-y · Cited by 79
Roelofs, C. L., Krepel, N., Corlier, J., Carpenter, L. L., Fitzgerald, P. B., Daskalakis, Z. J., Tendolkar, I., Wilson, A. C., Downar, J. H., Bailey, N. W., et al. (2020) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.017 · Cited by 78
Hill, H., Ott, F., & Weisbrod, M. (2005) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.12.004 · Cited by 75
Reichert, J. L., Kober, S. E., Neuper, C., & Wood, G. M. D. O. (2015) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.09.032 · Cited by 74
“For rs-data, the same procedure was applied except for EOG artifact correction which was carried out using the regression method by Gratton et al. (1983). Also, many factors (such as anatomical and neurophysiological properties of the brain, cranial bone structure and electrode impedances) can influence the amplitude…”
MethodSignal Quality Assessment Model for Wearable EEG Sensor on Prediction of Mental Stress
Hu, B., Peng, H., Zhao, Q., Hu, B., Majoe, D., Zheng, F., & Moore, P. T. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience · doi:10.1109/tnb.2015.2420576 · Cited by 74
“Traditional approaches to attenuating ocular artifacts are based on time domain [9] or frequency domain [10] techniques.”
BackgroundBrain–computer interfaces for EEG neurofeedback: Peculiarities and solutions
Huster, R. J., Mokom, Z. N., Enriquez‐Geppert, S., & Herrmann, C. S. (2013) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.08.011 · Cited by 83
Effects of recent word exposure on emotion-word Stroop interference: An ERP study
Gootjes, L., Coppens, L. C., Zwaan, R. A., Franken, I. H. A., & Strien, J. W. V. (2010) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.12.003 · Cited by 80
Age-related changes in neural recruitment for cognitive control
Kopp, B., Lange, F., Howe, J., & Wessel, K. (2014) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.12.008 · Cited by 81
Groom, M. J., Bates, A. T., Jackson, G. M., Calton, T. G., Liddle, P. F., & Hollis, C. P. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.09.018 · Cited by 73
Electrophysiological insights into processing nonverbal emotional vocalizations
Liu, T., Pinheiro, A. P., Deng, G., Nestor, P. G., McCarley, R. W., & Niznikiewicz, M. A. (2011) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e32834ea757 · Cited by 74
External Behavior Monitoring Mirrors Internal Behavior Monitoring
Bates, A. T., Patel, T. P., & Liddle, P. F. (2005) · Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.281 · Cited by 76
Cascio, C. J., Gu, C., Schauder, K. B., Key, A. P. F., & Yoder, P. J. (2015) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-015-0439-1 · Cited by 74
“Trials with ocular artifacts were corrected using NetStation's ocular artifact correction tool (Gratton et al. 1983).”
EEG Findings in Burnout Patients
van Luijtelaar, G., Verbraak, M. J. P. M., Bunt, M. V. D., Keijsers, G. P. J., & Arns, M. (2010) · Journal of Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1176/jnp.2010.22.2.208 · Cited by 87
Periañez, J. A., & Barceló, F. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.014 · Cited by 74
Angus, D. J., Kemkes, K., Schutter, D. J. L. G., & Harmon‐Jones, E. (2015) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12460 · Cited by 83
Reward valence modulates conflict-driven attentional adaptation: Electrophysiological evidence
van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2012) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.018 · Cited by 82
Subjective visual awareness emerges prior to P3
Koivisto, M., Salminen‐Vaparanta, N., Grassini, S., & Revonsuo, A. (2016) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13264 · Cited by 79
“trials) and eye movements were corrected with the Gratton & Coles algorithm (Gratton et al., 1983).”
MethodTime course of facial emotion processing in women with borderline personality disorder: an ERP study
Hidalgo, N. A. I., Oelkers‐Ax, R., Nagy, K., Mancke, F., Bohus, M., Herpertz, S. C., & Bertsch, K. (2015) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.140215 · Cited by 78
Kizuk, S. A. D., & Mathewson, K. E. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01058 · Cited by 68
Kujawa, A., Carroll, A., Mumper, E. E., Mukherjee, D., Kessel, E. M., Olino, T. M., Hajcak, G., & Klein, D. N. (2017) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.11.001 · Cited by 77
“Eye-blink correction (Gratton et al., 1983) and semi-automatic artifact rejection procedures were conducted.”
MethodThe Residual After Correcting Event‐Related Potentials for Blink Artifacts
Berg, P. (1986) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00646.x · Cited by 74
Clayson, P. E. (2020) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13583 · Cited by 74
An event-related potential evaluation of involuntary attentional shifts in young and older adults.
Gaeta, H., Friedman, D., Ritter, W., & Cheng, J. C. (2001) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.55 · Cited by 73
Ludlow, A., Mohr, B., Whitmore, A., Garagnani, M., Friedemann Pulvermüller, A., & Gutierrez, R. G. (2014) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2014.01.016 · Cited by 79
Pictures and Their Colors: What Do Children Remember?
Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., & Duff, M. (2003) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892903322307465 · Cited by 76
Ford, J. M., GRAY, M., Faustman, W. O., Heinks, T., & Mathalon, D. H. (2005) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.03.002 · Cited by 71
Meinhardt, J., Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., Döhnel, K., & Sommer, M. (2010) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2010.08.001 · Cited by 80
Auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia correlate with P50 gating.
Smith, D., Grant, B., Fisher, D., Borracci, G., Labelle, A., & Knott, V. (2013) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.004 · Cited by 71
“EEG data was digitally re-referenced to linked mastoids, bandpass filtered (P50: 10–49 Hz: 24 dB/octave – roll-off; N100: 1–50 Hz: 24 dB/octave – roll-off), epoch segmented (P50:150 ms, beginning 50 ms pre-stimulus onset; N100: 350 ms, beginning 50 ms pre-stimulus onset), EOG corrected (Gratton et al., 1983), artifact…”
Neurophysiological correlates of error correction in sensorimotor-synchronization
Praamstra, P., Turgeon, M., Hesse, C. W., Wing, A. M., & Perryer, L. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00351-3 · Cited by 73
“Eye blink artifacts were corrected using a regression approach (Gratton et al., 1983).”
Responsibility modulates neural mechanisms of outcome processing: An ERP study
Li, P., Han, C., Lei, Y., Holroyd, C. B., & Li, H. (2011) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01182.x · Cited by 73
“Ocular artifacts were corrected using the eye movement correction algorithm described by Gratton, Coles, and Donchin (1983).”
MethodTrippe, R. H., Hewig, J. S., Heydel, C., Hecht, H., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2007) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.035 · Cited by 79
“After segmentation, data were corrected for eye blinks ( Gratton et al., 1983 )a nd screened for artifacts using the software Brain Vision Analyzer 1.04 (Brain Products GmbH, Munich, Germany).”
MethodInfluentialStimulus-Response Compatibility in Huntington's Disease: A Cognitive-Neurophysiological Analysis
Beste, C., Carsten Saft, C., Andrich, J., Gold, R., & Falkenstein, M. (2008) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01152.2007 · Cited by 72
Moran, T. P., Taylor, D. L., & Moser, J. S. (2012) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.05.005 · Cited by 72
Dhar, M., Wiersema, J. R., & Pourtois, G. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019578 · Cited by 72
“Next, a baseline correction was performed using the pre-EMG response interval of 500 ms and the Gratton and colleagues algorithm [46] was used to correct vertical eye movements.”
MethodYordanova, J., Kolev, V., Wagner, U., Jan Born, A., & Verleger, R. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00097 · Cited by 77
“For evaluation of EEG changes during task execution, 30 artifact-free and EOG-corrected (Gratton, Coles, & Donchin, 1983 ) EEG segments were collected for two conditions of NRT performance (end of presleep practice and start of postsleep performance).”
MethodLiu, H., Rossi, S., Zhou, H., & Chen, B. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110887 · Cited by 72
“Eye blinks were mathematically corrected [27] and remaining artifacts were manually rejected.”
Neural Changes Associated with Treatment Outcome in Children with Externalizing Problems
Woltering, S., Granic, I., Lamm, C., & Lewis, M. D. (2011) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.029 · Cited by 76
“For the ERP analysis, regression-based eye-blink correction (Gratton, 1983) was performed to preserve trials.”
Seeing Objects through the Language Glass
Boutonnet, B., Dering, B. R., Viñas‐Guasch, N., & Thierry, G. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00415 · Cited by 69
EEG Theta Power Activity Reflects Workload among Army Combat Drivers: An Experimental Study
Díaz-Piedra, C., Sebastián, M. V., & Stasi, L. L. D. (2020) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci10040199 · Cited by 72
Predicted Sensory Modality Determines the Timing and Topographies of Omitted Stimulus Potentials
Ishida, T., & Nittono, H. (2025) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.70097 · Cited by 73
ERP Correlates of Effortful Control in Children with Varying Levels of ADHD Symptoms
Wiersema, J. R., & Roeyers, H. (2008) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9288-7 · Cited by 78
“The EEG was corrected for horizontal and vertical eye movements using the method of Gratton et al. (1983) .”
MethodBrain processing of task-relevant and task-irrelevant emotional words: An ERP study
González-Villar, A. J., Triñanes, Y., Zurrón, M., & Carrillo‐de‐la‐Peña, M. T. (2014) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-013-0247-6 · Cited by 74
Error processing in normal aging and in basal ganglia disorders
Beste, C., Willemssen, R., Carsten Saft, C., & Falkenstein, M. (2009) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.12.030 · Cited by 72
Context effects on familiarity are familiarity effects of context — An electrophysiological study
Ecker, U. K. H., Zimmer, H. D., Groh‐Bordin, C., & Mecklinger, A. (2007) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.01.005 · Cited by 72
“EOG artifacts picked up by four ocular electrodes were corrected offline (Gratton et al., 1983).”
BackgroundThe Functional and Temporal Characteristics of Top-down Modulation in Visual Selection
Rose, M., Schmid, C., Winzen, A., Sommer, T., & Büchel, C. (2004) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi012 · Cited by 72
“Whereas the latter artifacts led to rejection of a trial, EEGs were corrected for blinks and eye-movement artifacts by subtracting both EOG channels weighted by their transmission coefficient (Gratton et al., 1983).”
BackgroundPeter Hagoort, A., Wassenaar, M., & Brown, C. M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0230613100 · Cited by 72
Bostanov, V., Keune, P. M., Kotchoubey, B., & Hautzinger, M. (2012) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.05.031 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- ORCID
- Gratton, Gabriele
- Venue
- Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1983-04
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 468-484
- ISSN
- 0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114512489
- Cited by
- 5,055
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 89 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 177 · 2021: 178 · 2020: 223 · 2019: 213 · 2018: 235 · 2017: 253 · 2016: 267 · 2015: 263 · 2014: 283 · 2013: 301 · 2012: 276
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- ocular artifact removal, event-related potentials, saccades, eye movements, trial retention
- MeSH terms
- Blinking, Electroencephalography, Electrooculography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Mathematics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
