Cited by 1,113Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsTreatment of Major Depression

Mechanisms underlying induction of homosynaptic long-term depression in area CA1 of the hippocampus

Mulkey, Rosel M., Malenka, Robert C.·1992·Neuron

Abstract

The mechanisms responsible for long-lasting, activity-dependent decreases in synaptic efficacy are not well understood. We have examined the initial steps required for the induction of long-term depression (LTD) in CA1 pyramidal cells by repetitive low frequency (1 Hz) synaptic stimulation. This form of LTD was synapse specific, was saturable, and required activation of post-synaptic NMDA receptors. Loading CA1 cells with the Ca2+ chelator BAPTA prevented LTD, whereas lowering extracellular Ca2+ resulted in the induction of LTD by stimulation that previously elicited long-term potentiation. Following LTD, synaptic strength could be increased to its original maximal level, indicating that LTD is reversible and not due to deterioration of individual synapses. Induction of homosynaptic LTD therefore requires an NMDA receptor-dependent change in postsynaptic Ca2+ which may be distinct from that required for long-term potentiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90248-c

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low-frequency prolonged synaptic stimulation evokes an NMDAR-dependent LTD.

    “Low-frequency prolonged synaptic stimulation evokes an NMDAR-dependent LTD (374, 393), and blockade of phosphatases by Calyculin A enhances AMPAR responses but not NMDAR responses (Ref. 394, but see Ref. 395).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [393]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mulkey, R. M., & Malenka, R. C.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-11
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
967-975
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046388858
Cited by
1,113
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 30
FWCI
19.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29mh045334-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH45334, MH00942)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32NS007067, NS 07067)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
CA1 pyramidal neurons, hippocampus, NMDA receptor, calcium signaling, BAPTA, extracellular calcium, long-term potentiation, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Chelating Agents, Electric Stimulation, Hippocampus, Membrane Potentials, Synapses, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review