Cited by 86Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Colony formation of C57BL/6J mice in visible burrow system: identification of eusocial behaviors in a background strain for genetic animal models of autism

Open access
ARAKAWA, H, BLANCHARD, D, BLANCHARD, R·2007·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Deficits in social interaction are primary characteristics of autism, which has strong genetic components. Genetically manipulated mouse models may provide a useful research tool to advance the investigation of genes associated with autism. To identify these genes using mouse models, behavioral assays for social relationships in the background strains must be developed. The present study examined colony formation in groups of one male and three female mice (Experiment 1) and, groups of three male mice (Experiment 2) of the C57BL/6J strain in a semi-natural visible burrow system. For adult mixed-sex colonies, 4-h observations during both the dark and light cycles for 15 days demonstrated day-dependent increases in huddling together in the chamber accompanied by decreased frequencies of active social behaviors. Sequential analyses of social interactions indicated that approaches to the back of the approached animal typically elicited flight, while approaches to the front of the approached animal failed to do so. This was seen for female to female, and for female to male approaches, as well as male to female approaches, strongly counterindicating a view that rear approach/flight specifically reflects female responsivirity to unwanted male sexual approach. For adult male colonies, similar protocols found that these social behaviors were similar to those of adult mixed-sex colonies. These findings suggest two potentially useful measures of eusocial behavior in mice, of possible value for genetic mouse models of autism; that is, huddling together and approaches to the front but not the back, of conspecifics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.07.027

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [5]Blanchard RJ, O’Donnell V, Blanchard DC. Attack and defensive behaviors in the albino mouse. Aggress Behav. 1979;5:341–352. [Google Scholar]
  2. [10]Blanchard DC, Arakawa H, Crawley JN, Blanchard RJ. Social behaviors in wild and laboratory mice with a special emphasis on the C57BL/6J inbred strain. In: Crusio WE, Sluyter F, Gerlai RT, editors. Handbook of Behavioral Genetics of the Mouse. Elsevier; in press. [Google Scholar]
  3. [52]Parmigiani S, Brain PF, Palanza P. Ethoexperimental analysis of different forms of intraspecific aggression in the house mouse. In: Blanchard RJ, Brain PF, Blanchard DC, Parmigiani S, editors. Ethoexperimental approaches to the study of behavior. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1989. pp. 418–431. [Google Scholar]
  4. [53]Pellis SM, Pasztor TJ. The developmental onset of a rudimentary form of play fighting in C57 mice. Dev Psychobiol. 1999;34:175–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [61]Vale JR, Vale CA, Harley JP. Interaction of genotype and population number with regard to aggressive behavior, social grooming, and adrenal and gonadal weight in male mice. Commun Behav Biol A. 1971;6:209–221. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ARAKAWA, H., BLANCHARD, D., & BLANCHARD, R.
Affiliations
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
ARAKAWA, H
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01-10
Volume
176
Issue
1
Pages
27-39
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998247620
Cited by
86
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS039406)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, C57BL/6J mice, colony formation, social interaction, huddling, approach behavior, escape behavior, genetic mouse models
MeSH terms
Animals, Autistic Disorder, Behavior, Animal, Circadian Rhythm, Cooperative Behavior, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Group Processes, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Population Dynamics, Reference Values, Social Behavior, Behavioral Research, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review