Cited by 1,122Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 114 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 11 of the 118 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Contextual Behavioral Science: Examining the Progress of a Distinctive Model of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy

Open access
Hayes, Steven C., Levin, Michael E., Plumb-Vilardaga, Jennifer, Villatte, Jennifer L., Pistorello, Jacqueline·2013·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

A number of recent authors have compared acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and traditional cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). The present article describes ACT as a distinct and unified model of behavior change, linked to a specific strategy of scientific development, which we term "contextual behavioral science." We outline the empirical progress of ACT and describe its distinctive development strategy. A contextual behavioral science approach is an inductive attempt to build more adequate psychological systems based on philosophical clarity; the development of basic principles and theories; the development of applied theories linked to basic ones; techniques and components linked to these processes and principles; measurement of theoretically key processes; an emphasis on mediation and moderation in the analysis of applied impact; an interest in effectiveness, dissemination, and training; empirical testing of the research program across a broad range of areas and levels of analysis; and the creation of a more effective scientific and clinical community. We argue that this is a reasonable approach, focused on long-term progress, and that in broad terms it seems to be working. ACT is not hostile to traditional CBT, and is not directly buoyed by whatever weaknesses traditional CBT may have. ACT should be measured at least in part against its own goals as specified by its own developmental strategy. © 2011 Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2009.08.002

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

11 of 118 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 107 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 60
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 84
122 of 122
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There is one real world.

    “While functional contextualists assume the one (“real”) world, there may be many ways of successfully differentiating the world, depending on one’s goals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    All scientific theories are ultimately shown to be incorrect.

    “All scientific theories are ultimately shown to be incorrect.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The CBT tradition has relatively little written about how to produce greater progress within an empirical approach.

    “but in the cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) tradition relatively little has been written about how to produce greater progress within an empirical approach.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    ACT is not hostile to traditional CBT and is not directly buoyed by whatever weaknesses traditional CBT may have.

    “ACT is not hostile to traditional CBT, and is not directly buoyed by whatever weaknesses traditional CBT may have.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Nearly two dozen formal mediational analyses of ACT now exist, including some that are analyzed and being written up but not yet published or in press.

    “Nearly two dozen formal mediational analyses of ACT now exist, including those that are analyzed and being written up but are not yet published or in press.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are now scores of studies on ACT component methods, including studies not done by ACT researchers but clearly applicable to these components.

    “There are now scores of studies on ACT component methods, including those not done by ACT researchers but clearly applicable to these components.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The theoretical model provides the conceptual scaffolding for creating and deploying treatment technologies and components.

    “The theoretical model provides the conceptual scaffolding for creating and deploying treatment technologies and components.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In a CBS approach, all ideas and methods are contextually limited.

    “in a CBS approach all ideas and methods are assumed to be contextually limited.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    From a pragmatic perspective, the truth of an analysis is found in its utility where it is applied.

    “From a pragmatic perspective, the truth of a given analysis is found in its utility where it is applied.”
9 of 9

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 130 references

16 of the 130 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hayes, 1998, Market-driven treatment development, The Behavior Therapist, 21, 32
  2. Takahashi, 2002, Acceptance rationale and increasing pain tolerance: Acceptance-based and FEAR-based practice, Japanese Journal of Behavior Therapy, 28, 35
  3. Williams, L.M. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An example of third-wave therapy as a treatment for Australian Vietnam War veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Unpublished dissertation, Charles Stuart University, Bathurst, New South Wales.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,122

Metadata

Authors
Hayes, S. C., Levin, M. E., Plumb-Vilardaga, J., Villatte, J. L., & Pistorello, J.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Corresponding author
Hayes, Steven C.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
180-198
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056853212
Cited by
1,120
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 97 · 2025: 156 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 121 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 21
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH096341)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, contextual behavioral science, cognitive behavioral therapy, theory development, philosophy of psychology, mediating and moderating effects
MeSH terms
Behavior, Behavior Therapy, Humans, Object Attachment, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review