Cited by 542Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorEmotions and Moral BehaviorExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intranasal Administration of Oxytocin Increases Envy and Schadenfreude (Gloating)

Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G., Fischer, Meytal, Dvash, Jonathan, Harari, Hagai, Perach-Bloom, Nufar, Levkovitz, Yechiel·2009·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Humans have a strong social tendency to compare themselves with others. We tend to feel envious when we receive less valuable rewards and may rejoice when our payoffs are more advantageous. Envy and schadenfreude (gloating over the other's misfortune) are social emotions widely agreed to be a symptom of the human social tendency to compare one's payoffs with those of others. Given the important social components of envy and gloating, we speculated that oxytocin may have a modulating effect on the intensity of these emotions. Methods Fifty-six participants participated in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, within-subject study. Following the administration of oxytocin or a placebo, participants played a game of chance with another (fake) participant who either won more money (envy manipulation), lost more money (schadenfreude manipulation), or won/lost equal amounts of money. Results In comparison with the placebo, oxytocin increased the envy ratings during unequal monetary gain conditions involving relative loss (when the participant gained less money than another player). Oxytocin also increased the ratings of gloating during relative gain conditions (when the participant gained more money than the other player). By contrast, oxytocin had no effect on the emotional ratings following equal monetary gains nor did it affect general mood ratings. Conclusions These results suggest that the oxytocinergic system is involved in modulating envy and gloating. Thus, contrary to the prevailing belief that this system is involved solely in positive prosocial behaviors, it probably plays a key role in a wider range of social emotion-related behaviors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06.009

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 528

Metadata

Authors
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Fischer, M., Dvash, J., Harari, H., Perach-Bloom, N., & Levkovitz, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Shalvata Mental Health Center (IL)
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
66
Issue
9
Pages
864-870
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095144882
Cited by
542
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 28
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
oxytocin, envy, schadenfreude, social emotions, intranasal administration, social comparison, oxytocinergic system, prosocial behavior
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Oxytocin, Reward, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review