Cited by 294Cellular transport and secretionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchExtracellular vesicles in disease

Syntaxin-4 defines a domain for activity-dependent exocytosis in dendritic spines

Open access
Kennedy, Matthew J., Davison, Ian G., Robinson, Camenzind G., Ehlers, Michael D.·2010·Cell

Abstract

Changes in postsynaptic membrane composition underlie many forms of learning-related synaptic plasticity in the brain. At excitatory glutamatergic synapses, fusion of intracellular vesicles at or near the postsynaptic plasma membrane is critical for dendritic spine morphology, retrograde synaptic signaling, and long-term synaptic plasticity. Whereas the molecular machinery for exocytosis in presynaptic terminals has been defined in detail, little is known about the location, kinetics, regulation, or molecules involved in postsynaptic exocytosis. Here, we show that an exocytic domain adjacent to the postsynaptic density (PSD) enables fusion of large, AMPA receptor-containing recycling compartments during elevated synaptic activity. Exocytosis occurs at microdomains enriched in the plasma membrane t-SNARE syntaxin 4 (Stx4), and disruption of Stx4 impairs both spine exocytosis and long-term potentiation (LTP) at hippocampal synapses. Thus, Stx4 defines an exocytic zone that directs membrane fusion for postsynaptic plasticity, revealing a novel specialization for local membrane traffic in dendritic spines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.042

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By tagging AMPARs with a pH-sensitive tag (SEP-GluA1), insertion of AMPARs into the surface membrane can be directly visualized during LTP-inducing protocols.

    “By tagging AMPARs with a pH-sensitive tag (SEP-GluA1), the insertion of AMPARs into the surface membrane can be directly visualized during LTP-inducing protocols (249, 250, 335, 337, 338, 340).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [338]

    The Results section, “AMPA Receptors are Stably Inserted Into the Spine Plasma Membrane Via Fusion of Spine Endosomes” (page unavailable), reports direct imaging of SEP-GluR1 insertion after Bic/Gly stimulation. The paper describes Bic/Gly as increasing network activity; its separately described LTP-induction protocol was used for electrophysiology, not SEP-GluR1 imaging. It therefore supports the visualization claim but not specifically visualization during a protocol it identifies as LTP-inducing. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Blocking postsynaptic exocytosis by a variety of means blocks LTP/sLTP.

    “Numerous studies have shown that blocking postsynaptic exocytosis by a variety of means blocks LTP/sLTP (195, 249, 250, 332–338).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [338]

  • Stx-4 is reported to be required for LTP.

    “while on the other hand Stx-4 is reported to be required for LTP (336, 338).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [338]

  • Exocytic trafficking from recycling compartments contributes to dendritic spine growth in response to activity.

    “Exocytic trafficking from recycling compartments contributes to dendritic spine growth in response to activity (Park et al, 2006;Kennedy et al, 2010)”
  • Coupled with the potential of dendrites for activity-stimulated exocytosis, such a phenomenon could account for the perineuronal deposits of oligomers seen in Figure 1.

    “Coupled with the potential of dendrites for activity-stimulated exocytosis (Kennedy et al., 2010), such a phenomenon could account for the “perineuronal deposits” of oligomers seen in Figure 1 (Lacor et al., 2004).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kennedy, M. J., Davison, I. G., Robinson, C. G., & Ehlers, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Ehlers, Michael D.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
141
Issue
3
Pages
524-535
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982810155
Cited by
294
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 29
FWCI
12.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG024492)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH064748)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS047574)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
syntaxin 4, dendritic spines, synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation, postsynaptic density, t-SNARE, membrane fusion, hippocampal synapses
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Membrane, Cells, Cultured, Exocytosis, Hippocampus, Humans, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Endosomes, Dendritic Spines, SNARE Proteins, Qa-SNARE Proteins, Mice, Rats, Gene Knockdown Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review