Cited by 221Social and Intergroup PsychologyVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias

Open access
Maister, Lara, Sebanz, Natalie, Knoblich, Günther, Tsakiris, Manos·2013·Cognition

Abstract

Previous studies have investigated how existing social attitudes towards other races affect the way we 'share' their bodily experiences, for example in empathy for pain, and sensorimotor mapping. Here, we ask whether it is possible to alter implicit racial attitudes by experimentally increasing self-other bodily overlap. Employing a bodily illusion known as the 'Rubber Hand Illusion', we delivered multisensory stimulation to light-skinned Caucasian participants to induce the feeling that a dark-skinned hand belonged to them. We then measured whether this could change their implicit racial biases against people with dark skin. Across two experiments, the more intense the participants' illusion of ownership over the dark-skinned rubber hand, the more positive their implicit racial attitudes became. Importantly, it was not the pattern of multisensory stimulation per se, but rather, it was the change in the subjective experience of body ownership that altered implicit attitudes. These findings suggest that inducing an overlap between the bodies of self and other through illusory ownership is an effective way to change and reduce negative implicit attitudes towards outgroups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.002

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in the mental representation of one's own body affect the perceived similarity between one's own body and that of an outgroup, resulting in significant changes in implicit biases.

    “Taken together, the findings show that changes in the mental representation of one's own body affect the perceived similarity between one's own body and that of an outgroup, resulting in significant changes in implicit biases.”
  • Ownership of an outgroup body is associated with a significant reduction in implicit biases against that outgroup.

    “Ownership of an outgroup body has been found to be associated with a significant reduction in implicit biases against that outgroup.”
  • The manipulations used to induce bodily illusions involve highly salient multisensory cues that are strongly predictive of body ownership, and thus may override top-down modulations by social attitudes.

    “However, the manipulations used to induce bodily illusions involve highly salient multisensory cues which are strongly predictive of body ownership, and thus may override top-down modulations by social attitudes [9][10][11][12][13].”
  • The age study demonstrated a role of self-association in attitude change, whereas previous research had investigated more generic positive or negative associations with the embodied social group.

    “This study was notable because it demonstrated a role of the self-association in attitude change, whereas previous research [9,10] had investigated more generic positive or negative associations with the embodied social group.”
  • In the first study to test whether body ownership changes affect implicit biases, participants showed a significant decrease in negative implicit attitudes towards dark skin after a rubber hand illusion with a dark-skinned hand, and this decrease correlated with the strength of ownership experienced over the other-race hand.

    “Importantly, participants showed a significant decrease in negative implicit attitudes towards dark skin, which correlated with the strength of ownership experienced over the other-race hand.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maister, L., Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Tsakiris, M.
Affiliations
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Central European University (AT)
Corresponding author
Maister, Lara
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
128
Issue
2
Pages
170-178
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038594232
Cited by
221
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7
FWCI
42.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Experimental Psychology Society
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
implicit racial bias, body ownership, rubber hand illusion, multisensory integration, dark skin, outgroup attitudes, implicit attitudes, embodiment, intergroup attitudes
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude, Body Image, Female, Humans, Illusions, Male, White People, Racial Groups, Young Adult, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review