Cited by 252Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

High antenatal maternal anxiety is related to impulsivity during performance on cognitive tasks in 14- and 15-year-olds

Bergh, Bea R.H. Van den, Mennes, Maarten, Oosterlaan, Jaap, Stevens, Veerle, Stiers, Peter, Marcoen, Alfons, Lagae, Lieven·2005·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

This study prospectively investigated the influence of antenatal maternal anxiety, measured with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory at 12-22, 23-31 and 32-40 postmenstrual weeks of pregnancy, on cognitive functioning in 57 adolescents (mean age 15 years). ANCOVAs showed effects of State anxiety at 12-22 weeks, after controlling for influences of State anxiety in later pregnancy and postnatal maternal Trait anxiety. Adolescents of high anxious pregnant women reacted impulsively in the Encoding task; they responded faster but made more errors than adolescents of low anxious women. They also scored lower on two administered WISC-R subtests. In the Stop task no differences in inhibiting ongoing responses were found between adolescents of high and low anxious pregnant women. We suspect that high maternal anxiety in the first half of pregnancy may negatively affect brain development of the fetus, reflected by impulsivity and lower WISC-R scores at 14-15 years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.10.010

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergh, B. R. H. V. D., Mennes, M., Oosterlaan, J., Stevens, V., Stiers, P., Marcoen, A., & Lagae, L.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Antwerp University Hospital (BE)
Corresponding author
Bergh, Bea R.H. Van den
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-04
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
259-269
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066845146
Cited by
252
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
impulsivity, prenatal stress, fetal brain development, inhibitory control, WISC-R, pregnancy, state anxiety, trait anxiety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety Disorders, Cognition, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Language Tests, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality Inventory, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prospective Studies, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Verbal Behavior, Postmenopause

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review