PreprintCited by 4Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Neural Mechanisms of Memory

Open access
Amer, Tarek, Davachi, Lila·2022·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

The ability to form and access memories of our experiences involves complex neural mechanisms at both the cellular and systems levels. Animal and human (including lesion and neuroimaging) studies have evidenced a critical role for the hippocampus and connected brain regions in these processes. The current chapter will review the role of the hippocampus in the different stages of long-term memory, namely, encoding, consolidation, and retrieval. Specifically, this chapter will illustrate how the hippocampus, in conjunction with other brain regions, supports these processes, giving rise to our rich experience of remembering.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31234/osf.io/32egy

Cites

162 of 162 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to some theories of memory, regions with a relative specialization in particular modalities are also responsible for storing their respective modality-specific components of a particular memory.

    “According to some theories of memory, regions with a relative specialization in particular modalities (e.g. vision) are also responsible for storing their respective modality-specific components of a particular memory [67].”

    From Episodic Memory in AI Agents Poses Risks that Should be Studied and Mitigated (2025) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Systems Level Memory and the Medial Temporal Lobe section describes an account in which different cortical regions process distinct features of an episode and provide those inputs to the hippocampus. The Episodic retrieval: A brain-wide function section also describes reinstatement of studied content in cortical regions. Neither passage says that regions specialized for a sensory modality store that modality’s components of a memory; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 168 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Amaral, D., & Lavenex, P. (2007). Hippocampal neuroanatomy. P. Andersen, R. Morris, D. Amaral, T. Bliss, J. O'Keefe (Eds.), The Hippocampus Book, Oxford University Press, New York (2007), p. 872
  2. Dobbins, I. G., Foley, H., Schacter, D. L., & Wagner, A. D. (2002). Executive control during episodic retrieval: multiple prefrontal processes subserve source memory. Neuron, 35(5), 989-996.
  3. Knierim, J. J. (2015). The hippocampus. Current Biology, 25(23), R1116-R1121.
  4. Lashley, K. S. (1950). In search of the engram. In Society for Experimental Biology, Physiological mechanisms in animal behavior. (Society's Symposium IV.) (pp. 454-482). Academic Press.
  5. Lisman, J. E. (1999). Relating hippocampal circuitry to function: recall of memory sequences by reciprocal dentate-CA3 interactions. Neuron, 22(2), 233-242.
  6. Malenka, R. C., & Bear, M. F. (2004). LTP and LTD: An embarrassment of riches. Neuron, 44(1), 5-21.
  7. Mishkin, M. (1982). A memory system in the monkey. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 298(1089), 85-95.
  8. Miyashita, Y., & Chang, H. S. (1988). Neuronal correlate of pictorial short-term memory in the primate temporal cortex. Nature, 331(6151), 68-70.
  9. Nadel, L., Samsonovich, A., Ryan, L., & Moscovitch, M. (2000). Multiple trace theory of human memory: Computational, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological results. Hippocampus, 10(4), 352-368.
  10. Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval process in episodic process. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 353-373.
  11. Zola-Morgan, S., & Squire, L. R. (1990). The neuropsychology of memory: Parallel findings in humans and nonhuman primates. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 608, 434- 456.

Authors
Amer, T., & Davachi, L.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2022-06-29
Pages
94-112
OpenAlex
W4400773630
Cited by
3
References
168
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.79
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
memory, hippocampus, long-term memory, memory encoding, memory consolidation, memory retrieval, neural mechanisms of memory, brain regions, lesion studies, neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review