CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 434Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional-anatomic correlates of remembering and knowing

Wheeler, Mark E, Buckner, Randy L·2004·NeuroImage
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Neural correlates of remembering were examined using event-related functional MRI (fMRI) in 20 young adults. A recognition paradigm based on the remember/know (RK) procedure was used to separately classify studied items that were correctly identified and accompanied by a conscious recollection of details about the study episode from studied items that were correctly identified in the absence of conscious recollection. To facilitate exploration of the basis of remember decisions, studied items were paired with pictures and sounds to encourage retrieval of specific content during scanned testing. Analyses using a priori regions of interest indicated that remembering recruited both regions that associate with the perception and/or decision that information is old and regions that associate preferentially with visual content, while knowing recruited regions associated with oldness, but did not recruit visual content regions. Exploratory analyses further indicated a functional dissociation across regions of parietal cortex that may aid to reconcile several divergent results in the literature. Lateral parietal regions responded preferentially to remember decisions, while a slightly medial region responded robustly to both remember and know decisions. Taken collectively, these results suggest that remembering and knowing associate with common processes supporting a perception and/or the decision that information is old. Remembering additionally recruits regions specific to retrieved content, which may participate to convey the vividness typical of recollective experience.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.001

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Conturo, 1996, Sensitivity optimization and experimental design in functional magnetic resonance imaging, Abstr. - Soc. Neurosci., 22, 7
  2. Maccotta, 2002, Quantifying object processing and recognition in early and late visual areas, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 67

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 434

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wheeler, M. E., & Buckner, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Wheeler, Mark E
ORCID
Buckner, Randy L
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
1337-1349
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.001
OpenAlex
W2017869626
Cited by
434
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 34
FWCI
16.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh057506-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 57506)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
remembering, knowing, recollection, recognition memory, remember/know procedure, neural correlates of memory, parietal cortex, memory vividness, conscious recollection
MeSH terms
Adult, Association Learning, Auditory Perception, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Decision Making, Dominance, Cerebral, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mental Processes, Oxygen, Parietal Lobe, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Reference Values, Temporal Lobe, Verbal Learning, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review