The DOI matches its Crossref record; 422 of the 425 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 3 are not checked yet; 14 of the 384 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease
Open accessAbstract
Prefrontal cortical executive functions comprise a number of cognitive capabilities necessary for goal directed behavior and adaptation to a changing environment. Executive dysfunction that leads to maladaptive behavior and is a symptom of psychiatric pathology can be instigated or exacerbated by stress. In this review we survey research addressing the impact of stress on executive function, with specific focus on working memory, attention, response inhibition, and cognitive flexibility. We then consider the neurochemical pathways underlying these cognitive capabilities and, where known, how stress alters them. Finally, we review work exploring potential pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches that can ameliorate deficits in executive function. Both preclinical and clinical literature indicates that chronic stress negatively affects executive function. Although some of the circuitry and neurochemical processes underlying executive function have been characterized, a great deal is still unknown regarding how stress affects these processes. Additional work focusing on this question is needed in order to make progress on developing interventions that ameliorate executive dysfunction.
Verified 2026-10-05 · 3 references not checked yet
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
276 Not checked yet · 42 Own interpretation · 4 Partly supported · 3 Supported so far · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Own method · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“blocking either D1 or D2 in the mPFC or OFC had no effect on the 5-CRSTT (Granon et al 2000, Winstanley et al 2010), or the SST (Bari et al 2011, Bari & Robbins 2013b)”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 5. Response Inhibition > 5.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Granon et al 2000 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports that blocking D2 receptors in the mPFC with sulpiride had no significant effect on the five-choice serial reaction time task. But it also reports that the D1 antagonist SCH 23390 impaired attentional accuracy in rats with high baseline performance, contrary to the claim that blocking D1 had no effect. The OFC and SST portions are attached to other citations, not Granon et al. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked yetcites Winstanley et al 2010 source
- Partly supportedcites Bari et al 2011 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
For the SST portion attributed to Bari et al., Results (Experiment 3; page unavailable) report that a mixed D1/D2 antagonist infused into the dPL did not affect stop-signal reaction time. It did significantly slow the go response, however, and the paper did not test D1 and D2 blockade separately or infuse the antagonist into the OFC. The 5-CRSTT portion is attributed to other citations in the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“However, blocking D2 receptors in the dorsal striatum negatively affects SST performance (Eagle et al 2011).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 5. Response Inhibition > 5.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Eagle et al 2011 source
In Experiment 1 (Results), infusion of the D2-receptor antagonist sulpiride into the rat dorsomedial striatum increased stop-signal reaction time, indicating slower inhibition. The Discussion likewise describes this as impaired response-braking. The effect concerned stopping speed, not overall stopping accuracy. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Similarly, two weeks of chronic unpredictable stress also produces significant deficits in reversal learning, measured using the AST (Bondi et al 2007, Bondi et al 2010, Jett et al 2015, Jett & Morilak 2013) or using a Morris water maze spatial reversal task (Hill et al 2005, Quan et al 2011, Yu et al 2016).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bondi et al 2007 source
- Not checked yetcites Bondi et al 2010 source
- Supportedcites Jett et al 2015 source
The Chronic unpredictable stress Methods section describes daily stressors for two weeks. The Ketamine and AST Results section reports that CUS significantly increased trials to criterion on the first reversal task (R1) compared with unstressed controls (p < 0.01). Jett et al. is cited for the AST finding, not the Morris water maze finding. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“For example, two to five weeks of chronic intermittent cold stress results in robust deficits in the reversal learning component of the AST in rats (Danet et al 2010, Donegan et al 2014, Furr et al 2012, Lapiz-Bluhm et al 2009, Patton et al 2016, Wallace et al 2014).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Danet et al 2010 source
The Results for Experiment 2 report significant deficits on the R1 reversal task in rats exposed to either two or five weeks of chronic intermittent cold stress. The Methods identify this as testing in the attentional set-shifting task (AST). (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Not checked yetcites Donegan et al 2014 source
- Supportedcites Furr et al 2012 source
The Introduction (p. 2) reports a selective reversal-learning deficit after two weeks of chronic intermittent cold stress. The Abstract (p. 1) and Expt 3 results (p. 6) report impaired reversal learning after five weeks, with a significant stress effect (p < 0.01). (LLM, conf=0.92)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Compared to non-meditators, healthy volunteers who had followed a meditation training course for 6–8 weeks performed better on a Stroop task (Allen et al 2012, Moore & Malinowski 2009, Teper & Inzlicht 2013), the Hayling task (Heeren et al 2009), and response inhibition tasks (Sahdra et al 2011).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 5. Response Inhibition > 5.4. Non-pharmacological treatments
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Allen et al 2012 source
Allen et al. is cited for the Stroop task, not the Hayling or response-inhibition tasks, which have separate citations. The Results report that after six weeks, the meditation group had a significantly greater reduction in affective Stroop conflict than the active-control group. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Not checked yetcites Moore & Malinowski 2009 source
- Partly supportedcites Teper & Inzlicht 2013 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods Participants section says the meditators had at least one year of experience, not a 6–8-week training course. The Stroop Task Performance section reports fewer errors among meditators than controls, but describes the difference as a trend that was not robust. This citation is attached to the Stroop finding, not the separately cited Hayling and response-inhibition tasks; page numbers are not available in the supplied passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Depletion of dopamine in this brain region, but not in the OFC, caused deficits in marmosets (Clarke et al 2011, Clarke et al 2007)”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Clarke et al 2011 source
The Discussion reports that dopamine depletion in the marmoset caudate nucleus increased reversal-learning errors. It also reports that selective dopamine depletion in the OFC had no effect on reversal learning, citing the earlier OFC work. The claim accurately summarizes that contrast. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Clarke et al 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that dopamine depletion in the marmoset OFC did not impair reversal learning. It does not report striatal dopamine depletion causing deficits in marmosets; its suggestion of a striatal role concerns L-dopa-treated Parkinson’s patients, not a striatal-depletion experiment. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“correct reversal learning deficits induced by chronic cold stress (Danet et al 2010, Lapiz-Bluhm et al 2009)”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Danet et al 2010 source
The Discussion reports that chronic treatment with citalopram, an SSRI, reversed the cognitive deficit induced by chronic intermittent cold stress in rats. The Introduction and Discussion identify that deficit as impaired reversal learning. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Not checked yetcites Lapiz-Bluhm et al 2009 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Vortioxetine has been shown to improve a range of cognitive impairments in depressed patients (McIntyre et al 2014, Pehrson & Sanchez 2014, Sanchez et al 2015).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.3. Set-shifting
What the sources say
- Supportedcites McIntyre et al 2014 source
The Discussion reports improvement versus placebo across several cognitive domains in adults with recurrent major depressive disorder, including executive function, attention, processing speed, learning, and memory. It also reports improvement on subjective measures of cognitive function. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Partly supportedcites Pehrson & Sanchez 2014 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Multimodal Antidepressants section reports benefits on processing speed, verbal learning, and memory tests in elderly depressed patients. This supports improvement across several cognitive measures, but the cited clinical finding is limited to elderly patients; the claim states it for depressed patients generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Supportedcites Sanchez et al 2015 source
Section 3.3.3 reports that vortioxetine improved multiple measures of cognitive function versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder, including executive function, attention, processing speed, learning, and memory. The review’s overall conclusions likewise state that it was superior to placebo on various cognitive measures in these patients. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Executive dysfunction that leads to maladaptive behavior and is a symptom of psychiatric pathology can be instigated or exacerbated by stress.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both preclinical and clinical literature indicates that chronic stress negatively affects executive function.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > Abstract
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 9
- It may state two separate claims as one. 51
In the paper
“The stress response is a highly conserved process essential for survival under conditions of environmental challenge (McEwen et al 2015, McKlveen et al 2015).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Overall impact of stress on executive function
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McEwen et al 2015, McKlveen et al 2015 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in some cases, executive impairment may be a direct consequence of an underlying disease process independent of stress.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 1. Introduction
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“human fMRI studies of large-scale interconnectivity networks identified the central executive network (CEN) as one of three core neurocognitive networks.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Menon 2011 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Anomalies in the recruitment of prefrontal circuitry and patterns of activation in major depression have also been shown (Johnstone et al 2007), with decreases in activation of the dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC) (Drevets 1998) and hyperactivation of the OFC (Biver et al 1994, Drevets et al 1992).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Overall impact of stress on executive function
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“rats exposed to chronic stress displayed atrophy of the associative network (dorsomedial striatum-prefrontal circuitry) and hypertrophy of the sensorimotor network responsible for automated responses (dorsolateral striatal-prefrontal circuitry).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Overall impact of stress on executive function
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dias-Ferreira et al 2009 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this work demonstrates stress produces structural and functinoal changes in fronto-striatal circuitry that reduces the ability of an individual to shift from automated behavior to goal-directed behavior and may be maladaptive in situations of change.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Overall impact of stress on executive function
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“both acute stressful life events and chronic stressors are strong risk factors for the development of mental illnesses such as mood disorders (Beck 2008, Kessler 1997), anxiety disorders and addictive disorders (Kessler et al 1997).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Beck 2008, Kessler 1997 source
- Not checked yetcites Kessler et al 1997
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“processes underlying working memory, problem solving and cognitive flexibility are negatively affected by acute stress (Oei et al 2006, Plessow et al 2011, Plessow et al 2012, Schoofs et al 2008, Schoofs et al 2009, Steinhauser et al 2007).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Overall impact of stress on executive function
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Oei et al 2006, Plessow et al 2011, Plessow et al 2012, Schoofs et al 2008, Schoofs et al 2009, Steinhauser et al 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the aftermath of an acute stress exposure, executive processes improve and these effects have been shown to correlate with genomic corticosteroid actions (Henckens et al 2011, Het & Wolf 2007, Maheu et al 2005, Oei et al 2009, Putman et al 2007).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Overall impact of stress on executive function
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Henckens et al 2011, Het & Wolf 2007, Maheu et al 2005, Oei et al 2009, Putman et al 2007 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“individuals with major depressive disorder show impairments in working memory (Landro et al 2001, Rose & Ebmeier 2006) and cognitive flexibility on the Wisconsin card sorting test (Merriam et al 1999).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Overall impact of stress on executive function
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Acute stress in humans has been shown to activate saliency networks centered around the amygdala, cingulate cortex, hypothalamus, insula, striatum, and locus coeruleus, and is responsible for enhancing sensory gain and environmental scanning, resulting in better performance (Cousijn et al 2010, Oei et al 2012, van Marle et al 2009, van Marle et al 2010).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Overall impact of stress on executive function
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cousijn et al 2010, Oei et al 2012, van Marle et al 2009, van Marle et al 2010 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“about 1 hour after exposure to a stressful stimulus, when catecholamine levels are low but glucocorticoid levels are still elevated, the neurocognitive processes associated with the salience network weaken (Henckens et al 2012, Henckens et al 2010), while working memory and the ability to perform cognitive tasks improve, along with reduced anxiety behavior.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Overall impact of stress on executive function
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Henckens et al 2012, Henckens et al 2010 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“in other brain regions, such as amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and putamen, chronic stress increases dendritic elaboration and produces structural hypertrophy (Dias-Ferreira et al 2009, Liston et al 2006).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Overall impact of stress on executive function
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dias-Ferreira et al 2009, Liston et al 2006 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data suggest that GABA-related “overinhibition” may underlie working memory impairment in schizophrenia, and that targeting this system may offer a strategy for treating such impairments.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > 3.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“lorazepam, a positive modulator at the GABAA receptor benzodiazepine site, impaired working memory in healthy controls, with even more impairment in the patient group.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > 3.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Menzies et al 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“low doses administered to stably medicated patients can improve cognitive performance in working memory tasks, likely via prefrontal D1 receptor activation (Barch & Carter 2005, Goldberg et al 1991)”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > 3.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Barch & Carter 2005, Goldberg et al 1991
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the GABAA receptor antagonist flumazenil significantly improved working memory in the patient group but impaired working memory in healthy controls (Menzies et al 2007).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > 3.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Menzies et al 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“FG7142 also mimics the increased norepinephrine release in the PFC that accompanies stress, implicating a role for norepinephrine in the detrimental effects on PFC-mediated working memory.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > 3.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Murphy et al 1996 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“working memory deficits are present in a wide range of stress-related psychiatric illnesses, such as PTSD (Veltmeyer et al 2006), depression (Rose & Ebmeier 2006), substance dependence (Bechara & Martin 2004), schizophrenia (Stone et al 1998), and ADHD (Martinussen et al 2005).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > 3.2. Effects of stress on working memory
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“stress-induced working memory impairments are accompanied by increased prefrontal dopamine turnover and release, similar to the prefrontal dopamine dysfunction seen in schizophrenia.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > 3.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We excluded articles where the deficits in executive functions were confounded by neurological conditions or physical trauma.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 2. Methods
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Administration of stimulants to unmedicated schizophrenic patients can enhance positive symptoms (Angrist et al 1980, van Kammen et al 1982), which is likely due to subcortical D2 receptor activation.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > 3.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Angrist et al 1980, van Kammen et al 1982 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“vortioxetine reverses working memory impairments caused by serotonin depletion, effects attributed to its 5HT1A agonism (du Jardin et al 2014)”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > Serotonin
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites du Jardin et al 2014 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Lesions of the mPFC, as well as compromised connectivity of the inferior PFC to striatal, cerebellar, and parietal regions, result in deficits in attention in rats and humans (Maddux & Holland 2011, Muir et al 1996), (Arnsten 2009, Arnsten & Rubia 2012, Aron & Poldrack 2005).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 4. Attention
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Maddux & Holland 2011, Muir et al 1996
- Not checked yetcites Arnsten 2009, Arnsten & Rubia 2012, Aron & Poldrack 2005 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Attention is another executive function of the PFC that is affected by an individual’s emotional and motivational state (Goetz et al 2008) and is often impaired by stress in both humans and in animal models.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 4. Attention
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Goetz et al 2008 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“modafinil enhances working memory in healthy individuals as well as individuals with a wide range of psychiatric illnesses, and this improvement is likely due to modafinil’s catecholaminergic actions (Kalechstein et al 2010, Kalechstein et al 2013, Minzenberg & Carter 2008).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > 3.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kalechstein et al 2010, Kalechstein et al 2013, Minzenberg & Carter 2008 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“students in the negative stressor condition (where stress was induced by engaging in a competitive computer task) were quicker to switch their attention from negative words to positive or neutral words, and participants who had higher scores on the Beck Depression Inventory were slower to redirect their attention from negative to positive words (Ellenbogen et al 2002).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 4. Attention > 4.2. Effects of stress on attention
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ellenbogen et al 2002 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“modafinil, an atypical dopamine transporter inhibitor, reverses chronic stress-induced impairments in a spontaneous alternation task in mice and improves working memory in non-stressed animals (Pierard et al 2006).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > 3.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pierard et al 2006 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Military personnel with a high practice time of mindfulness training during the high-stress pre-deployment period demonstrated increases in working memory capacity, while those in the military control group or those with low practice time demonstrated decreases in working memory.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > 3.4. Non-pharmacological treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jha et al 2010 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“systemic administration of fluoxetine did reverse a predator stress-induced deficit in working memory, while the benzodiazepine diazepam was not effective (Hage et al 2004).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > Serotonin
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hage et al 2004 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“expressive writing, in particular about a negative stressful experience, produced higher increases in working memory capacity in college freshmen compared to those writing about a trivial topic; these gains were associated with decreases in intrusive and avoidant thinking (Klein & Boals 2001).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > 3.4. Non-pharmacological treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Klein & Boals 2001
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, these studies suggest that the effects of stress on attention may depend on the amount of time one is subjected to stress (i.e. chronic, acute, and experimentally-induced brief stress) and the emotional valence of the stimuli presented during the task.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 4. Attention > 4.2. Effects of stress on attention
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another form of behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), improves subjects’ ability to direct attention and detect changes in stimuli through mindfulness training (Jha et al 2007).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 4. Attention > 4.4. Non-pharmacological treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jha et al 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“OFC and infralimbic (IL) mPFC have been shown to mediate response inhibition, as lesions of these areas produce premature responding in the 5-CSRTT and SSRT (Chudasama et al 2003, Eagle et al 2008a, Eagle & Robbins 2003).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 5. Response Inhibition
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The α1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin and the αβ1/β/α2 adrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol produced deficits in attention, the α2-adrenoceptor antagonist atipamezole improved continued attention (Bari & Robbins 2013b).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 4. Attention > 4.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bari & Robbins 2013b
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Activation of α2 autoreceptors improved attention in some studies (Smith & Nutt 1996), but not in others (Fernando et al 2012).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 4. Attention > 4.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Smith & Nutt 1996
- Not checked yetcites Fernando et al 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“drugs such as methylphenidate that function by increasing extracellular dopamine through DAT inhibition are routinely used to target attention deficits, and these effects are context-dependent (Volkow et al 2005).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 4. Attention > 4.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Volkow et al 2005 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Within depressed patients, one session of TMS targeted to the left DLPFC increased activity within the region and increased attention in an affective go-no-go task (Bermpohl et al 2006).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 4. Attention > 4.4. Non-pharmacological treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bermpohl et al 2006 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Additionally, the role of striatal D2 receptors have been linked to impulsivity and addictive behavior (Volkow et al 2007).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 5. Response Inhibition > 5.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Volkow et al 2007 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additionally, both NMDA-R antagonism and 5-HT2A receptor activation result in increased glutamate release (Aghajanian & Marek 2000, Moghaddam et al 1997).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 5. Response Inhibition > 5.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aghajanian & Marek 2000
- Not checked yetcites Moghaddam et al 1997 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Microinjections of fluoxetine into the OFC increase response inhibition in rats already showing impulsive tendencies, but have no effect in low impulsivity rats. This finding indicates direct effects of SSRIs within the PFC of animals already exhibiting a deficit, but do not enhance response inhibition in normal animals (Darna et al 2015).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 5. Response Inhibition > 5.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Darna et al 2015 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The serotonergic system has long been implicated in the regulation of behavioral inhibition (Evenden 1999, Linnoila et al 1983).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 5. Response Inhibition > 5.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“which may increase levels of 5-HT and norepinephrine leading to increased NMDA-R function within the mPFC, and subsequent beneficial effects on response inhibition measures (Carli et al 2011, Carli & Invernizzi 2014, Darna et al 2015, Mirjana et al 2004).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 5. Response Inhibition > 5.4. Non-pharmacological treatments
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In comparing patients before and after 10 weeks of VNS, the treatment significantly improved response inhibition, as well as other cognitive symptoms (Sackeim et al 2001).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 5. Response Inhibition > 5.4. Non-pharmacological treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sackeim et al 2001
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This form of learning is mediated by the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), as evidenced by impairments in reversal learning following lesions of this region in humans (Fellows & Farah 2003, Hornak et al 2004), monkeys (Dias et al 1996), mice (Bissonette et al 2008) and rats (McAlonan & Brown 2003).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similarly, phencyclidine (PCP), when used at doses to mimic schizophrenia-like symptoms in rats, impaired reversal in some cases (Abdul-Monim et al 2007), but in other studies it was found to have no effect (Brigman et al 2010, Janhunen et al 2015), or to even improve reversal learning (Dix et al 2010, Fellini et al 2014, McAllister et al 2015).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other brain regions important for reversal learning are the striatum (Cools et al 2002, Rogers et al 2000), amygdala (Izquierdo et al 2013, Schoenbaum et al 2003, Wassum & Izquierdo 2015) and the hippocampus (Mala et al 2015).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“other activators of the JAK2/STAT3 pathway, such as interleukin 6 (IL-6), have been shown to correct the reversal learning deficits induced by cold stress, and blockade of IL-6 signaling or JAK2 inhibition produce deficits in reversal learning (Donegan et al 2014).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Donegan et al 2014 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a recent study, the ability of ketamine to correct stress-induced reversal learning deficits was accompanied by decreased field potentials in the OFC evoked by activation of mediodorsothalamic afferents, and both effects required activation of the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in the OFC (Patton et al 2016).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Patton et al 2016
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Indeed, LTD is required for optimal reversal learning: administration of a ionotropic glutamate receptor NMDA subunit 2B (GluN2B) selective antagonist or blockade of GluA-R internalization prevents LTD in the hippocampus, and produces a disruption of spatial reversal learning in the Morris water maze (Dong et al 2013, Duffy et al 2008, Mills et al 2014).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, it is possible that ketamine’s beneficial effects on reversal learning are due to regulation of AMPA-R transmission.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The effects of vortioxetine are not due solely to its ability to inhibit serotonin reuptake, since the drug was effective in correcting reversal learning deficits induced by serotonin depletion with PCPA (Wallace et al 2014).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wallace et al 2014 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In animal models, the outcomes of experiments with acute stressors have been mixed, possibly due to varying intensity of the stress used.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.3. Set-shifting
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In monkeys, serotonin depletion within the prefrontal cortex using 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine caused reversal learning deficits, but not set-shifting deficits (Clarke et al 2004, Clarke et al 2005).”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After 8–12 weeks of CBT, these individuals improved both their YBOCS and reversal task scores”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Freyer et al 2011 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“depletion of tryptophan in healthy human volunteers homozygous for the long allele of 5-HTT reduced the capacity of the individuals to utilize negative feedback information from punishment and impaired performance on reversal learning.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Finger et al 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although serotonin depletion has been shown to impair reversal learning but not set-shifting (Clarke et al 2005, Lapiz-Bluhm et al 2009)”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.3. Set-shifting
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“available therapies are only partially effective at ameliorating cognitive symptoms.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 7. Concluding remarks
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The impact of stress on executive function is well documented both in humans and in animal models.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 7. Concluding remarks
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Findings from animal models of stress and executive function can be generalized to humans.
“Paralleling human studies, chronic stress impairs working memory (Arnsten et al 2012, Barsegyan et al 2010, Mizoguchi et al 2000) as well as cognitive flexibility”
The paper relies on this without support.
The stress manipulations used in the cited animal and human studies are valid models of chronic stress as it occurs in humans.
“conditions that are the hallmarks of chronic stress”
The paper relies on this without support.
Orbitofrontal cortex damage does not impair extradimensional shifting.
“OFC damage does not impair ED shifting, and lateral or medial PFC damage does not impair reversal learning, suggesting a functional dissociation between those regions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Lateral or medial prefrontal cortex damage does not impair reversal learning.
“OFC damage does not impair ED shifting, and lateral or medial PFC damage does not impair reversal learning, suggesting a functional dissociation between those regions.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As part of the frontoparietal network (188), the parietal cortex interacts with core PFC regions to support attention and integration (189); hypoactivation due to PFC dysconnectivity (175) may exacerbate cognitive inflexibility by impairing spatial attention and working memory updating (190), indirectly amplifying DMN rumination in OCD (191).”
From Neural mechanisms underlying cognitive inflexibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a review (2026) · cites this paper as [189]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.3. Set-shifting
“SERT knockout mice perform better than control mice on the set-shifting task of AST (Nonkes et al 2012)”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > References
“296. Nonkes LJ van de V II de Leeuw MJ Wijlaars LP Maes JH Homberg JR 2012 Serotonin transporter knockout rats show improved strategy set-shifting and reduced latent inhibition”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
“amantadine, a low affinity NMDA-R antagonist, has been shown to correct deficits in spatial reversal learning in the Morris water maze in mice that experience a combination of chronic unpredictable stress and isolation feeding (Yu et al 2016)”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > References
“409. Yu M Zhang Y Chen X Zhang T 2016 Antidepressant-like effects and possible mechanisms of amantadine on cognitive and synaptic deficits in a rat model of chronic stress”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > 3.4. Non-pharmacological treatments
“one session of TMS of the DLPFC was sufficient to improve working memory on the n-back task fifteen minutes later in antidepressant-free patients diagnosed with depression (Oliveira et al 2013)”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > References
“303. Oliveira JF Zanao TA Valiengo L Lotufo PA Bensenor IM 2013 Acute working memory improvement after tDCS in antidepressant-free patients with major depressive disorder”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 4. Attention > 4.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
“citalopram reduced attentional performance compared to placebo; this effect strongly correlated with high-transcription variants of 5-HT2A and 5-HT1B receptors (Lenze et al 2013)”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > References
“223. Lenze EJ Dixon D Nowotny P Lotrich FE Dore PM 2013 Escitalopram reduces attentional performance in anxious older adults with high-expression genetic variants at serotonin 2A and 1B receptors”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 5. Response Inhibition > 5.4. Non-pharmacological treatments
“Finally, another noninvasive treatment for impulse control in current use is VNS.”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 3. Working Memory > 3.4. Non-pharmacological treatments
“In VNS, an electrode surrounds the left vagus nerve and communicates with a pulse generator to send pulses of a programmed width, frequency, current, and cycle to the vagus nerve (Schachter & Saper 1998).”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 4. Attention > 4.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
“a selective 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT had beneficial effects, increasing attention”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 5. Response Inhibition > 5.3. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacological targets
“5-HT1A antagonism with 8-OH-DPAT within the PFC was also able to block CPP-induced elevations in extracellular glutamate”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
“genetic inactivation of 5-HTT in mice produces deficits in reversal learning (Brigman et al 2010)”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > References
“58. Brigman JL Mathur P Harvey-White J Izquierdo A Saksida LM 2010 Pharmacological or genetic inactivation of the serotonin transporter improves reversal learning in mice”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > 6. Cognitive flexibility > 6.2. Reversal learning
“Impaired reversal learning following D2/D3 antagonists was observed in rats (Boulougouris et al 2009)”
§ Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease > References
“54. Boulougouris V Castane A Robbins TW 2009 Dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist quinpirole impairs spatial reversal learning in rats: investigation of D3 receptor involvement in persistent behavior”
Citations
Cites
Diamond, A. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 · Cited by 13,268
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition.
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., et al. (2004) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bph077 · Cited by 7,234
Baddeley, A. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1736359 · Cited by 5,258
Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709 · Cited by 4,472
Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model
Menon, V. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003 · Cited by 4,168
A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression.
Zarate, C. A., Singh, J. B., Carlson, P. J., Brutsche, N. E., Ameli, R., Luckenbaugh, D. A., Charney, D. S., & Manji, H. K. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.856 · Cited by 3,766
Krystal, J. H. (1994) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950030035004 · Cited by 3,330 · cited 1×
“…with antagonists of N-methyl-Daspartate glutamate receptors (NMDA-Rs) resulting in working memory impairments in rodents (Pontecorvo et al 1991), non-human primates (Baron & Wenger 2001, Frederick et al 1995, Roberts et al 2010), and humans (Ghoneim et al 1985, Krystal et al 1994, Oye et al 1992).”
BackgroundAlterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation
Davidson, R. J., Kabat-Zinn, J., Schumacher, J., Rosenkranz, M., Muller, D., Santorelli, S. F., Urbanowski, F., Harrington, A., Bonus, K., & Sheridan, J. F. (2003) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000077505.67574.e3 · Cited by 2,925
A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking
Berg, E. A. (1948) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.1948.9918159 · Cited by 2,255
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The role of the medial prefrontal cortex in cognition, ageing and dementia
Jobson, D. D., Hase, Y., Clarkson, A. N., & Kalaria, R. N. (2021) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcab125 · Cited by 338
Let’s call the whole thing off: evaluating gender and sex differences in executive function
Grissom, N. M., & Reyes, T. M. (2019) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0179-5 · Cited by 306
Noradrenergic Modulation of Fear Conditioning and Extinction
Giustino, T. F., & Maren, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00043 · Cited by 203
Bloemendaal, M., Szopinska-Tokov, J., Belzer, C., Boverhoff, D., Papalini, S., Michels, F., van Hemert, S., Arias Vasquez, A., & Aarts, E. (2021) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01404-9 · Cited by 118
Wellman, C. L., Bangasser, D. A., Bollinger, J. L., Coutellier, L., Logrip, M. L., Moench, K. M., & Urban, K. R. (2018) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1673-18.2018 · Cited by 88
Early life stress and substance use disorders: The critical role of adolescent substance use
Kirsch, D. E., & Lippard, E. (2022) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2022.173360 · Cited by 86
Gelfo, F. (2019) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00150 · Cited by 76
Krick, A., Felfe, J., & Pischel, S. (2021) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-02-2021-0067 · Cited by 80
Sic, A., Cvetkovic, K., Manchanda, E., & Knezevic, N. N. (2024) · Diseases · doi:10.3390/diseases12090220 · Cited by 65
Kamran, M., Bibi, F., Rehman, A. U., & Morris, D. W. (2022) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes13040646 · Cited by 65
Effects of Prenatal Stress on Behavior, Cognition, and Psychopathology: A Comprehensive Review
Jagtap, A. B., Jagtap, B., Jagtap, R., Lamture, Y. R., & Gomase, K. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.47044 · Cited by 78
Stress and neurocognitive efficiency in managerial contexts
Crivelli, D., Fronda, G., Venturella, I., & Balconi, M. (2019) · International Journal of Workplace Health Management · doi:10.1108/ijwhm-07-2018-0095 · Cited by 62
Kirsch, D. E., Nemeroff, C. B., & Lippard, E. (2020) · Adversity and Resilience Science · doi:10.1007/s42844-020-00005-7 · Cited by 61
Fee, C., Prévot, T. D., Misquitta, K. A., Banasr, M., & Sibille, E. L. (2020) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.05.034 · Cited by 51
Virtual reality modulating dynamics of neuroplasticity: Innovations in neuro-motor rehabilitation
Wankhede, N. L., Koppula, S., Ballal, S., Doshi, H., Kumawat, R., Raju, S., Arora, I., Sammeta, S. S., Khalid, M., Zafar, A., et al. (2024) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.12.040 · Cited by 52
Chronic stress, executive functioning, and real‐life self‐control: An experience sampling study
Wolff, M., Enge, S., Kräplin, A., Krönke, K., Bühringer, G., Smolka, M. N., & Goschke, T. (2020) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12587 · Cited by 46
Paredes, D., & Morilak, D. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00046 · Cited by 44
Self-citationMoses, T. E. H., Gray, E., Mischel, N., & Greenwald, M. K. (2023) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2023.100515 · Cited by 45
5-Fluorouracil impairs attention and dopamine release in rats
Jarmolowicz, D. P., Gehringer, R. C., Lemley, S. M., Sofis, M. J., Kaplan, S. V., & Johnson, M. A. (2019) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2019.01.007 · Cited by 38
Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
Acar-Burkay, S., & Cristian, D. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114911 · Cited by 38
O’Neill, J., Kamper‐DeMarco, K. E., Chen, X., & Orom, H. (2020) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2020.101417 · Cited by 40
Devilbiss, D. M. (2018) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2018.06.015 · Cited by 33
Duque, A., Cano‐López, I., & Puig‐Pérez, S. (2022) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.15721 · Cited by 43
Liu, T., Lu, J., Łukasiewicz, K., Pan, B., & Zuo, Y. (2021) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100342 · Cited by 32
Theodoratou, M., & Argyrides, M. (2024) · Psychiatry International · doi:10.3390/psychiatryint5010005 · Cited by 56
Malsen, J. G. D. M., Röhrdanz, N., Buschhoff, A.-S., Schiffelholz, T., Sigurdsson, T., & Wulff, P. (2023) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.107532 · Cited by 32
DNA methylation in stress and depression: from biomarker to therapeutics
Sales, A. J., Guimarães, F. S., & Joca, S. R. L. (2021) · Acta Neuropsychiatrica · doi:10.1017/neu.2021.18 · Cited by 29
Kluge, M. G., Maltby, S., Walker, N., Bennett, N., Aidman, E., Nalivaiko, E., & Walker, F. R. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245068 · Cited by 29
Facilitating Health-Oriented Leadership from a Leader’s Perspective
Krick, A., Felfe, J., Hauff, S., & Renner, K. (2022) · Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O · doi:10.1026/0932-4089/a000397 · Cited by 24
Epigenetic mechanisms within the cingulate cortex regulate innate anxiety-like behavior
Sah, A., Sotnikov, S., Kharitonova, M., Schmuckermair, C., Diepold, R. P., Landgraf, R., Whittle, N., & Singewald, N. (2019) · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyz004 · Cited by 24
Priorities in stress research: a view from the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health
Simmons, J. M., Winsky, L., Zehr, J. L., & Gordon, J. A. (2020) · Stress · doi:10.1080/10253890.2020.1781084 · Cited by 27
Hao, Y., Yao, L., Smith, D. M., Sorel, E., Anderson, A. K., Schumacher, E. H., & Evans, G. W. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44624-2 · Cited by 18
Signal value of stress behaviour
Whitehouse, J., Milward, S. J., Parker, M. O., Kavanagh, E., & Waller, B. M. (2022) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.04.001 · Cited by 20
Effects of web-based mindfulness training on psychological outcomes, attention, and neuroplasticity
Álvarez, M. G. M., Hölzel, B. K., Bremer, B., Wilhelm, M., Hell, E., Tavacioglu, E. E., Koch, K., & Torske, A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-48706-0 · Cited by 26
Palamarchuk, I. S., Slavich, G. M., Vaillancourt, T., & Rajji, T. K. (2023) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/s12868-023-00831-2 · Cited by 26
Molloy, C., & Farrell, R. (2024) · Computers in the Schools · doi:10.1080/07380569.2024.2325441 · Cited by 27
Impact of corticoid receptors on Alzheimer’s disease: a neuroendocrine perspective
Goel, F., Kumar, D., & Sharma, A. (2025) · Inflammopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s10787-025-01734-w · Cited by 19
Paredes, D., Knippenberg, A. R., Bulin, S. E., Keppler, L. J., & Morilak, D. A. (2022) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2022.100468 · Cited by 16
Self-citationChen, J., Yang, J., Xiang, Z., Huang, X., Lu, C., Liu, S., Chen, Y., & Hu, J. (2020) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.15048 · Cited by 17
Food Insecurity across the Life-Course and Cognitive Function among Older Mexican Adults
Saenz, J. L., Kessler, J., & Nelson, E. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14071462 · Cited by 18
Wang, H., Ren, L., Li, T., Pu, L., Huang, X., Wang, S., Song, C., & Liang, Z. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.960953 · Cited by 17
Executive functioning in pediatric cystic fibrosis: A preliminary study and conceptual model
Borschuk, A. P., Molitor, S. J., Everhart, R. S., Siracusa, C. M., & Filigno, S. S. (2020) · Pediatric Pulmonology · doi:10.1002/ppul.24648 · Cited by 16
Chopstick operation training with the left non-dominant hand
Sawamura, D., Sakuraba, S., Yoshida, K., Hasegawa, N., Suzuki, Y., Yoshida, S., Honke, T., & Sakai, S. (2021) · Translational Neuroscience · doi:10.1515/tnsci-2020-0189 · Cited by 15
Kelley, D. P., Singleton, S. P., Venable, K. E., Sturm, G., Skovgaard, A., Francis, J., Neylan, T. C., Bradley, E., Woolley, J. D., Picard, M. A., et al. (2025) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106419 · Cited by 14
Meamar, M., Rashidy‐Pour, A., Rahmani, M., Vafaei, A. A., & Raise‐Abdullahi, P. (2023) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2023.173560 · Cited by 14
de Oliveira, M. E. C., Torres, G. D. S. V., Franklin, R. G., Gomes, K. A. L., Nóbrega, W. F. S., Fernandes, T. P., & dos Santos, N. A. (2023) · Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research · doi:10.1590/1414-431x2023e12947 · Cited by 16
Cognitive dysfunction in mice lacking proper glucocorticoid receptor dimerization
Looveren, K. V., Boxelaere, M. V., Callaerts‐Vegh, Z., & Libert, C. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226753 · Cited by 15
Viol, K., Schiepek, G. K., Kronbichler, M., Hartl, A. J., Grafetstätter, C., Strasser, P., Kastinger, A., Schöller, H. J., Reiter, E.-M., Said‐Yürekli, S., et al. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02913-5 · Cited by 15
Solé‐Padullés, C., Macià, D., Andersson, M., Stiernstedt, M., Pudas, S., Düzel, S., Zsoldos, E., Ebmeier, K. P., Binnewies, J., Drevon, C. A., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.795764 · Cited by 13
H omo sapiens , industrialisation and the environmental mismatch hypothesis
Longman, D. P., & Shaw, C. N. (2025) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.70094 · Cited by 23
Yun, S., Soler, I., Tran, F. H., Haas, H. A., Shi, R., Bancroft, G. L., Suarez, M., de Santis, C. R., Reynolds, R. P., & Eisch, A. J. (2023) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1151877 · Cited by 12
Foláyan, M. O., Tantawi, M. E., Oginni, A. B., Adeniyi, A. A., Alade, M. A., & Finlayson, T. L. (2020) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-020-01120-8 · Cited by 12
O’Neill, J., Cameron, C. E., Leone, L. A., & Orom, H. (2021) · Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/jts5.111 · Cited by 12
Exploring Neural Correlates between Anxiety and Inhibitory Ability: Evidence from Task‐Based fNIRS
Wang, D., Lin, B., Huang, Y., Chong, Z. Y., Du, J., Yuan, Q., Tang, Y., Xu, Q., & Xu, W. (2024) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1155/2024/8680134 · Cited by 12
The brain under pressure: Exploring neurophysiological responses to cognitive stress
Wriessnegger, S. C., Leitner, M., & Kostoglou, K. (2024) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106239 · Cited by 10
Jiaqing, H., Tian, Y., Mimi, Z., Jiaxin, Y., Stephano, E. E., Yang, M., & Li, Y. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03006-y · Cited by 10
Alizamini, M. M., Fattahi, M., Sayehmiri, F., Haghparast, A., & Liang, J. (2022) · Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s10571-022-01289-2 · Cited by 9
Saenz, J. L., & Avila, J. C. (2023) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-023-04497-7 · Cited by 11
Panzer, É., Olmo, I. G., de Vasconcelos, A. P., Stéphan, A., & Cassel, J. (2024) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105762 · Cited by 9
Begega, A., Cuesta‐López, I., Cuesta, M., Jove, C. I., Moreno‐Fernández, R. D., & López, M. (2023) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.01.012 · Cited by 8
Tabullo, Á., Chiófalo, M. F., & Wainselboim, A. J. (2023) · Reading Psychology · doi:10.1080/02702711.2023.2246972 · Cited by 10
Jozani, M. S., Ghasemi, F., Babamiri, M., & Kalatpour, O. (2023) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103484 · Cited by 8
Ye, Q., Chen, H., Liu, R., Qin, R., Luo, C., Li, M., Xu, Y., Zhao, H., & Bai, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.756241 · Cited by 6
Benfatah, M., Elazizi, I., Belhaj, H., & Lamiri, A. (2025) · Journal of Nursing Regulation · doi:10.1016/j.jnr.2025.08.004 · Cited by 8
Carcelén‐Fraile, M. D. C., Hita‐Contreras, F., Mesas-Aróstegui, M. A., & Aibar‐Almazán, A. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13192415 · Cited by 9
Prefrontal Cortex Dysfunction as a Precipitating Factor for Schizophrenia and Depression
Uliana, D. L., & Grace, A. A. (2026) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.70409 · Cited by 8
Paredes, D., & Morilak, D. A. (2023) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyad043 · Cited by 6
Self-citationDaily Sleep–Stress Reactivity and Functional Impairment in World Trade Center Responders
Messman, B., Slavish, D. C., Briggs, M., Ruggero, C. J., Luft, B. J., & Kotov, R. (2023) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kaad005 · Cited by 6
The role of leader-employee communication in Health-oriented Leadership
Bruhn, K., Tautz, D., & Felfe, J. (2025) · Gruppe Interaktion Organisation Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) · doi:10.1007/s11612-025-00822-3 · Cited by 7
Mindful feeding: Associations with COVID-19 related parent stress and child eating behavior
Varghese, M., Sherrard, A., Vang, M., & Tan, C. C. (2022) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.106363 · Cited by 5
Logue, E. M., Hilsabeck, R. C., & Melamed, E. (2024) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2024.2335115 · Cited by 5
Keinert, M., Schindler‐Gmelch, L., Eskofier, B. M., & Berking, M. (2024) · International Journal of Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1007/s41811-024-00218-z · Cited by 5
Psychoneuroimmunology in the Daily Clinic is Only Possible Within a Contextual Frame
Pruimboom, L., Rocio, F. A., & Ledesma, S. N. (2024) · Integrated science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73061-0_16 · Cited by 5
Kirsch, D. E., Nemeroff, C. B., & Lippard, E. (2025) · FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.focus.25023013 · Cited by 6
Leung, R., Cook, M., Capra, M. F., & Johnstone, K. R. (2022) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-022-01863-7 · Cited by 5
Crocker, R. M., Dueñas, K. R., Castro, I., Ingram, M., Torres, E., & Carvajal, S. C. (2024) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/10497323241251776 · Cited by 6
Distress Tolerance as a Risk Factor for Specific Internet-Use Disorders
Hew, Y. C., & Chew, P. K. H. (2025) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-025-00489-z · Cited by 4
The Influence of Perceived Crowdedness on Aggressive Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model
Xie, Y., Dai, W., & Yang, Z. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15030259 · Cited by 4
Executive functioning: perspectives on neurotrophic activity and pharmacology
Sun, M. (2018) · Behavioural Pharmacology · doi:10.1097/fbp.0000000000000427 · Cited by 5
Chang, M., Tan, A., Schaffir, J., & Wegener, D. T. (2022) · Journal of Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health · doi:10.26502/jppch.74050131 · Cited by 4
Yang, A., Lu, H. J., & Chang, L. (2024) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106159 · Cited by 5
Zhou, L., Zhang, K., Guo, J., Liu, J., Wang, S., & Gong, J. (2024) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s452447 · Cited by 5
Gillespie, K. M., Dymond, A. H., Li, X., Schweitzer, D. R., Branjerdporn, G., Khan, S., Hii, Q., Keller, S., & Bartlett, S. E. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13154348 · Cited by 4
McIntyre, M., Cullen, J., Turner, C., Bohanna, I., Lakhini, A., & Rixon, K. (2024) · Brain Impairment · doi:10.1071/ib23058 · Cited by 4
Sal-Sarria, S., González‐Pardo, H., & Conejo, N. M. (2025) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2025.108060 · Cited by 4
Church, N. T., Weissner, W., Galler, J. R., Amaral, A. C. S., Rosene, D. L., McGaughy, J. A., Rushmore, J., Larrabee, E., & Mokler, D. J. (2021) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/bne0000479 · Cited by 4
Lim, S.-L., Martin, L. E., & Catley, D. (2020) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.06.012 · Cited by 4
Kelemen, H., Balla, G. Y., Demeter, K., Sipos, E., Buzás-Kaizler, A., Bíró, L., Aliczki, M., Orsolits, B., Kerényi, Á., Balogh, Z., et al. (2025) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-025-02227-8 · Cited by 3
Ma, C., Wang, Y., Fu, J., & Zhao, X. (2025) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102424 · Cited by 3
Pueyo, N., Navarro, J. B., de la Osa, N., Penelo, E., & Ezpeleta, L. (2022) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2022.13 · Cited by 3
Liu, J., Tabisola, K. M., & Morilak, D. A. (2025) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-025-02074-7 · Cited by 3
Self-citationStress, Reward, and Cognition in the Obese Brain
Verdejo‐García, A., Martín-Pérez, C., & Kakoschke, N. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813146-6.00016-3 · Cited by 5
Cabrera-Vélez, M., & Ballabriga, M. C. J. (2023) · Interdisciplinaria Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines · doi:10.16888/interd.2023.40.3.13 · Cited by 3
Peñaloza‐Sancho, V., Pérez-Valenzuela, C., Gonzalez, C., Jujihara, G., Bustos, P., & Dagnino‐Subiabre, A. (2019) · Nutritional Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/1028415x.2019.1659561 · Cited by 3
Emotion Regulation Under Stress: A Social Processing and Memory Perspective
Dennis, N. J., Bulgin, T., Nicastri, C. M., Bell, C., & Delgado, M. R. (2024) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2024_560 · Cited by 3
Effects of stress on the human body
Пизова, Н. В., Pizov, A. V., & Solovyov, I. N. (2025) · Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council · doi:10.21518/ms2025-273 · Cited by 2
Usluoğlu, F. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03349-w · Cited by 2
Forest breaks improve employees’ health and attitudes towards work
Longman, D. P., Todorova, Y., BISHOP, N. C., Coates, J. K., James, L. J., Lintuluoto, A., & Shaw, C. N. (2025) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129142 · Cited by 2
Exercise intervention for rumination: from neural mechanisms to clinical applications
Bai, J., & Zhang, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1785621 · Cited by 2
Advancing Inclusive Digital Well-Being Tools: How Neurodivergent Students Use Distraction Blockers
Hariadi, M. C., Chow, K., & McGrenere, J. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790801 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Girotti, M., Adler, S. M., Bulin, S. E., Fucich, E. A., Paredes, D., & Morilak, D. A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Girotti, Milena
- Venue
- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 161-179
- ISSN
- 0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5756532
- OpenAlex
- W2725639589
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 422
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (MH072672, MH053851, MH100652)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- prefrontal cortex, executive function, chronic stress, executive dysfunction, working memory, attention, response inhibition, cognitive flexibility, neurochemical pathways, stress-related psychiatric disorders, pharmacological interventions, non-pharmacological treatment
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Prefrontal Cortex, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
