Cited by 450Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Understanding memory through hippocampal remapping

Colgin, Laura Lee, Moser, Edvard I., Moser, May-Britt·2008·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

Memory interference is a common cause of forgetting. Interference is a byproduct of the need to balance the formation of well-differentiated representations against the ability to retrieve memories from cues that are not identical to the original experience. How the brain accomplishes this has remained elusive. Here we review how insights can be gained from studies of an apparently unrelated phenomenon in the rodent brain--remapping in hippocampal place cells. Remapping refers to the formation of distinct representations in populations of place cells after minor changes in inputs to the hippocampus. Remapping might reflect processes involved generally in decorrelation of overlapping signals. These processes might be crucial for storing large numbers of similar experiences with only minimal interference.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2008.06.008

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Theoretical models propose that remapping occurs because these cells respond to global contextual cues in order to decorrelate related experiences with distinct contextual relevance.

    “Theoretical models of this phenomenon propose that remapping occurs because these cells are responding to global contextual cues (like arousal or attention) in order to decorrelate related experiences with distinct contextual relevance (Colgin et al., 2008; Sanders et al., 2020).”

    From Remapping in a recurrent neural network model of navigation and context inference (2023) · cites this paper as Colgin et al., 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colgin, L. L., Moser, E. I., & Moser, M.-B.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
  • Colgin, Laura Lee
  • Moser, May-Britt
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
469-477
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149615516
Cited by
450
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 21
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
place cells, memory interference, forgetting, memory retrieval, hippocampal representations, rodent hippocampus, spatial memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Brain Mapping, Evoked Potentials, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Neuronal Plasticity, Space Perception, Spatial Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review