Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 804

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management

Open access
Lind, E.Allan, van den Bos, Kees·2002·Research in Organizational Behavior
DOI 10.1016/s0191-3085(02)24006-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-3085(02)24006-x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Ashford, 1985, Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 67, 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1985.tb00181.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baumeister, 1990, Anxiety and social exclusion, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 165, 10.1521/jscp.1990.9.2.165 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bobocel, 1998, Managerial accounts and fairness perceptions in conflict resolution: Differentiating the effects of minimizing responsibility and providing justification, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 133, 10.1207/s15324834basp2002_5 · DOI
  4. Brockner, 2002, Making sense of procedural justice: How high procedural justice can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability, Academy of Management Review, 27, 58, 10.5465/amr.2002.5922363 · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.5922363 · Paper page
  5. Brockner, 2000, Culture and procedural fairness: When the effects of what you do depend on how you do it, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 138, 10.2307/2666982 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Brockner, 1997, When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 558, 10.2307/2393738 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Brockner, 1996, An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures, Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189, 10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.189 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.189 · Paper page
  8. Brouwers, 1993, Uncertainty orientation and protection motivation theory: The role of individual differences in health compliance, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 102, 10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.102 · DOI
  9. Daly, 1994, The role of fairness in implementing large-scale change: Employee evaluations of process and outcome in seven facility relocations, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 623, 10.1002/job.4030150706 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Daly, 1996, Is outcome fairness used to make procedural fairness judgments when procedural information is inaccessible?, Social Justice Research, 9, 327, 10.1007/BF02196989 · DOI
  11. Dawes, 1979, The robust beauty of improper linear models of decision making, American Psychologist, 34, 571, 10.1037/0003-066X.34.7.571 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Folger, 1977, Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement of experienced inequity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108, 10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.108 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.108 · Paper page
  13. Folger, 1989, Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions, Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115, 10.2307/256422 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Folger, 1979, Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2253, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2253 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2253 · Paper page
  15. Greenberg, 1993, Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81, 10.1006/obhd.1993.1004 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Greenberg, 1994, Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 288, 10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.288 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.288 · Paper page
  17. Greenberg, 1997, A social influence model of employee theft: Beyond the fraud triangle, vol. 6, 29
  18. Greenberg, 1996, Why do employees bite the hands that feed them?, vol. 18, 111
  19. Hammond, 1976, Science, values, and human judgment, Science, 194, 389, 10.1126/science.194.4263.389 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Hogg, 2000, Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes, European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223, 10.1080/14792772043000040 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Huo, 1996, Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer?, Psychological Science, 7, 40, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00664.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. Jackson, 1988, Discerning threats and opportunities, Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 370, 10.2307/2392714 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kidwell, 1994, Employee reactions to electronic systems, Group and Organization Management, 19, 203, 10.1177/1059601194192006 · DOI
  24. Kim, 1993, Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary management compliance with multinationals' corporate strategic decisions, Academy of Management Journal, 36, 502, 10.2307/256590 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kim, 1995, A procedural justice model of strategic decision making: Strategy content implications in the multinational, Organizational Science, 6, 44, 10.1287/orsc.6.1.44 · DOI
  26. Koper, 1993, Procedural fairness and self-esteem, European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 313, 10.1002/ejsp.2420230307 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Korsgaard, 1995, Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 60, 10.2307/256728 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kulik, 2000, Demographics in service encounters: Effects of racial and gender congruence on perceived fairness, Social Justice Research, 13, 375, 10.1023/A:1007675010798 · DOI
  29. Lind, 1992, The fairness heuristic: Rationality and “relationality” in procedural evaluations
  30. Lind, 2000, The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination claims, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 557, 10.2307/2667109 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Lind, 1990, Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952, 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.952 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Lind, 2001, Primacy effects in justice judgments: Testing predictions from fairness heuristic theory, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 189, 10.1006/obhd.2000.2937 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Lind, 1993, Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224, 10.2307/2393412 · DOI · Paper page
  34. MacCrimmon, 1990, Characteristics of risk taking executives, Management Science, 6, 422, 10.1287/mnsc.36.4.422 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Novelli, 1995, Effective implementation of organizational change: An organizational justice perspective, vol. 2, 15
  36. Pablo, 1996, The role of risk in acquisition decision making processes, Journal of Management, 22, 723, 10.1177/014920639602200503 · doi:10.1177/014920639602200503
  37. Podsakoff, 1993, Citizenship behavior and fairness in organizations: Issues and directions for future research, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6, 235, 10.1007/BF01419449 · DOI
  38. Roney, 1995, Self-evaluation motives and uncertainty orientation: Asking the “who” question, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1319, 10.1177/01461672952112009 · DOI
  39. See, 2000, Interactional effects of fairness and knowledge in outcome acceptance decisions, Unpublished manuscript
  40. Singh, 1986, Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making, Academy of Management Journal, 29, 562, 10.2307/256224 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Smith, 1998, The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: Group-membership, self-worth and treatment quality, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 470, 10.1006/jesp.1998.1360 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Sorrentino, 1995, Uncertainty orientation and trust in close relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 314, 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.314 · DOI
  43. Sorrentino, 1984, Uncertainty orientation: Implications for affective and cognitive views of achievement behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 189, 10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.189 · DOI
  44. Sorrentino, 1986, Uncertainty orientation, motivation and cognition, vol. 1, 379
  45. Staw, 1981, Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multi-level analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501, 10.2307/2392337 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Tyler, 1998, Conflict with outsiders: Disputing within and across cultural boundaries, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 137, 10.1177/0146167298242003 · DOI
  47. Van den Bos, 2001, Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 931, 10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.931 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.931 · Paper page
  48. Van den Bos, 2001, Reactions to perceived fairness: The impact of mortality salience and self-esteem on ratings of negative affect, Social Justice Research, 14, 1, 10.1023/A:1012501506803 · DOI
  49. Van den Bos, 2002, Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments, vol. 34, 1
  50. Van den Bos, 2001, The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory, vol. 2, 49
  51. Van den Bos, 2000, Toward understanding why fairness matters: The influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 355, 10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.355 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.355 · Paper page
  52. Van den Bos, 2002, Parents' reactions to child day care organizations: The influence of perceptions of procedures and the role of organizations' trustworthiness, Social Justice Research, 15, 53, 10.1023/A:1016097715802 · DOI
  53. Van den Bos, 1997, Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 95, 10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.95 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.95 · Paper page
  54. Van den Bos, 1998, When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1449, 10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1449 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1449 · Paper page
  55. Walker, 1974, Reactions of participants and observers to modes of adjudication, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 295, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1974.tb02601.x · DOI
  56. Weiss, 1999, Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 786, 10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.786 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.786 · Paper page

Cited by

See all 804

Metadata

Authors
Lind, E. A., & van den Bos, K.
Venue
Research in Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
24
Pages
181-223
ISSN
0191-3085 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0191-3085(02)24006-x
OpenAlex
W1976364149
Cited by
804
References
13
FWCI
10.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0191-3085(02)24006-x
The paper
Lind, E. A., & van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(02)24006-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.