The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Modern Methods for Business Research
(1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410604385 · Cited by 6,534
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231 · cited 7×
“Computer-recorded, objective measures can rule out the reporting biases due to selective recall (Davis et al., 1992) and inaccurate estimation ARTICLE IN PRESS M.Y. Yi, Y. Hwang / Int.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 · Cited by 2,906
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · Cited by 2,458
Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12864 · Cited by 1,204
Yi, M. Y., Jackson, J. D., Park, J. S., & Probst, J. C. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006 · Cited by 1,139
Self-citationModelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers
Teo, T. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006 · Cited by 1,009
Developing and validating a service robot integration willingness scale
Lu, L., Cai, R., & Gursoy, D. (2019) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.01.005 · Cited by 1,013
Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review
Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., & Budgen, D. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005 · Cited by 851
Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222250405 · Cited by 737
Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014 · Cited by 693
Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/17465660710834453 · Cited by 624
Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots
de Graaf, M. M. A., & Ben Allouch, S. (2013) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2013.07.007 · Cited by 499
Sutanto, J., Palme, E., Tan, C.-H., & Phang, C. W. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.4.07 · Cited by 412
Marketing AI recruitment: The next phase in job application and selection
van Esch, P., Black, J. S., & Ferolie, J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.009 · Cited by 391
Caffaro, F., Micheletti Cremasco, M., Roccato, M., & Cavallo, E. (2020) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.028 · Cited by 360
Zhang, P. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.1.11 · Cited by 331
Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.017 · Cited by 379
Hertzum (2017) · doi:10.1145/3127358 · Cited by 307
Zhu, G., So, K. K. F., & Hudson, S. (2017) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-09-2016-0496 · Cited by 298
Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023 · Cited by 254
Gamal Aboelmaged, M. (2010) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635571011030042 · Cited by 240
Enjoy and learn with educational games: Examining factors affecting learning performance
Giannakos, M. N. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.005 · Cited by 234
Exploring consumers’ intention to accept smartwatch
Wu, L.-H., Wu, L.-C., & Chang, S.-C. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.005 · Cited by 226
Teo, T. (2010) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-009-9066-4 · Cited by 226
George Saadé, R., Nebebe, F., & Tan, W. (2007) · Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning · doi:10.28945/392 · Cited by 223
A ChatBot for Learning Chinese: Learning Achievement and Technology Acceptance
Chen, H.-L., Vicki Widarso, G., & Sutrisno, H. (2020) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633120929622 · Cited by 220
Self-efficacy and acceptance of robots
Latikka, R., Turja, T., & Oksanen, A. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.017 · Cited by 200
Teenagers in social virtual worlds: Continuous use and purchasing behavior in Habbo Hotel
Mäntymäki, M., & Salo, J. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.003 · Cited by 178
Magni, M., Susan Taylor, M., & Venkatesh, V. (2010) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.03.004 · Cited by 173
Enjoyment intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people
Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Wielinga, B., & Evers, V. (2008) · Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction · doi:10.1145/1349822.1349838 · Cited by 170
Mei, B., Brown, G. T. L., & Teo, T. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633117700144 · Cited by 168
(2008) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 147
Park, N. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01440.x · Cited by 141
Kim, T. (., Suh, Y. K., Lee, G., & Choi, B. G. (2010) · International Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1002/jtr.787 · Cited by 139
Sellers’ Trust and Continued Use of Online Marketplaces
University of Arizona, & Sun, H. (2010) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00226 · Cited by 136
Kim, Y., & Glassman, M. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.018 · Cited by 134
Rodriguez, D. M., Teesson, M., & Newton, N. C. (2014) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1111/dar.12102 · Cited by 92
Shao, C., Nah, S., Makady, H., & McNealy, J. (2024) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2331858 · Cited by 94
Understanding applicants’ reactions to gamified recruitment
Buil, I., Catalán, S., & Martínez, E. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.041 · Cited by 85
Cross cultural analysis of the use and perceptions of web based learning systems
Arenas-Gaitán, J., Ramírez-Correa, P. E., & Javier Rondán-Cataluña, F. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.016 · Cited by 83
Modeling Key Drivers of E-Learning Satisfaction among Student Teachers
Teo, T., & Wong, S. L. (2013) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.48.1.d · Cited by 77
Job candidates’ reactions to AI-enabled job application processes
van Esch, P., Black, J. S., & Arli, D. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-020-00025-0 · Cited by 72
A P5 Approach to m-Health: Design Suggestions for Advanced Mobile Health Technology
Gorini, A., Mazzocco, K., Triberti, S., Sebri, V., Savioni, L., & Pravettoni, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02066 · Cited by 59
Huet, N., Escribe, C., Dupeyrat, C., & Sakdavong, J.-C. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.003 · Cited by 59
TikTok app usage behavior: the role of hedonic consumption experiences
Abbasi, A. Z., Ayaz, N., Kanwal, S., Albashrawi, M., & Khair, N. (2023) · Data Technologies and Applications · doi:10.1108/dta-03-2022-0107 · Cited by 38
Investigating effects of perceived technology-enhanced environment on self-regulated learning
Sui, C.-J., Yen, M.-H., & Chang, C.-Y. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12270-x · Cited by 27
Li, Q., & Luximon, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2050540 · Cited by 30
(2005) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 16
Al-Maghrabi, T., & Dennis, C. (2010) · International Journal of Customer Relationship Marketing and Management · doi:10.4018/jcrmm.2010040102 · Cited by 7
Xu, W., Zhu, K., Zhou, D., Wang, C., & Wen, C. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15070828 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Yi, M. Y., & Hwang, Y.
- Venue
- International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 431-449
- ISSN
- 1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965410815
- Cited by
- 1,301
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 41.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
