Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In vitro colonic metabolism of coffee and chlorogenic acid results in selective changes in human faecal microbiota growth

Mills, Charlotte E., Tzounis, Xenofon, Oruna-Concha, Maria-Jose, Mottram, Don S., Gibson, Glenn R., Spencer, Jeremy P. E.·2015·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Coffee is a relatively rich source of chlorogenic acids (CGA), which, as other polyphenols, have been postulated to exert preventive effects against CVD and type 2 diabetes. As a considerable proportion of ingested CGA reaches the large intestine, CGA may be capable of exerting beneficial effects in the large gut. Here, we utilise a stirred, anaerobic, pH-controlled, batch culture fermentation model of the distal region of the colon in order to investigate the impact of coffee and CGA on the growth of the human faecal microbiota. Incubation of coffee samples with the human faecal microbiota led to the rapid metabolism of CGA (4 h) and the production of dihydrocaffeic acid and dihydroferulic acid, while caffeine remained unmetabolised. The coffee with the highest levels of CGA ( P < 0·05, relative to the other coffees) induced a significant increase in the growth of Bifidobacterium spp. relative to the control vessel at 10 h after exposure ( P < 0·05). Similarly, an equivalent quantity of CGA (80·8 mg, matched with that in high-CGA coffee) induced a significant increase in the growth of Bifidobacterium spp. ( P < 0·05). CGA alone also induced a significant increase in the growth of the Clostridium coccoides – Eubacterium rectale group ( P < 0·05). This selective metabolism and subsequent amplification of specific bacterial populations could be beneficial to host health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114514003948

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 2005, J Food Prot, 68, 2672, 10.4315/0362-028X-68.12.2672 · DOI
  2. 10.1128/AEM.70.10.6113-6122.2004 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.abb.2010.03.005 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0958-6946(99)00046-1 · DOI
  5. 2007, J Nutr, 137, 2503S, 10.1093/jn/137.11.2503S · DOI
  6. 10.1021/jf0101410 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S0723-2020(99)80053-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s00213-011-2395-0 · DOI
  9. 1998, Appl Environ Microb, 64, 3336, 10.1128/AEM.64.9.3336-3345.1998 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/089106099435862 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/jf303440j · DOI
  12. 10.1099/13500872-142-5-1097 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 1995, Appl Environ Microb, 61, 3069, 10.1128/AEM.61.8.3069-3075.1995 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.06.014 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.3945/ajcn.111.027847 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.3945/ajcn.110.000075 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2008, Br J Nutr, 99, 782, 10.1017/S0007114507853384 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 2005, J Nutr, 135, 2786, 10.1093/jn/135.12.2786 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.10.008 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.10.007 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90192-2 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/1751-7915.12049 · DOI
  24. 10.1079/NRR200479 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00402.x · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01252.x · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.0812600106 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 2005, Handbook on Clostridia
  29. 10.1086/341914 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.3748/wjg.v17.i12.1519 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1111/j.1708-8305.1997.tb00772.x · DOI
  32. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01316.x · DOI
  33. 10.1124/dmd.109.028019 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.011 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00506-8 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1021/jf3002153 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1093/carcin/18.4.833 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Mills, C. E., Tzounis, X., Oruna-Concha, M.-J., Mottram, D. S., Gibson, G. R., & Spencer, J. P. E.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2015-03-26
Volume
113
Issue
8
Pages
1220-1227
ISSN
  • 0007-1145
  • 1475-2662
Cited by
168
References
11
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vitro colonic metabolism of coffee and chlorogenic acid results in selective changes in human faecal microbiota growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0007114514003948
The paper
Mills, C. E., Tzounis, X., Oruna-Concha, M.-J., Mottram, D. S., Gibson, G. R., & Spencer, J. P. E. (2015). In vitro colonic metabolism of coffee and chlorogenic acid results in selective changes in human faecal microbiota growth. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114514003948

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.