Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,534

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Synthesis and Activities of Rutile IrO2 and RuO2 Nanoparticles for Oxygen Evolution in Acid and Alkaline Solutions

Lee, Youngmin, Suntivich, Jin, May, Kevin J., Perry, Erin E., Shao-Horn, Yang·2012·The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
DOI 10.1021/jz2016507
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The activities of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) on iridium-oxide- and ruthenium-oxide-based catalysts are among the highest known to date. However, the OER activities of thermodynamically stable rutile iridium oxide (r-IrO2) and rutile iridium oxide (r-RuO2), normalized to catalyst mass or true surface area are not well-defined. Here we report a synthesis of r-IrO2 and r-RuO2 nanoparticles (NPs) of ∼6 nm, and examine their OER activities in acid and alkaline solutions. Both r-IrO2 and r-RuO2 NPs were highly active for OER, with r-RuO2 exhibiting up to 10 A/goxide at 1.48 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode. When comparing the two, r-RuO2 NPs were found to have slightly higher intrinsic and mass OER activities than r-IrO2 in both acid and basic solutions. Interestingly, these oxide NPs showed higher stability under OER conditions than commercial Ru/C and Ir/C catalysts. Our study shows that these r-RuO2 and r-IrO2 NPs can serve as a benchmark in the development of active OER catalysts for electrolyzers, metal-air batteries, and photoelectrochemical water splitting applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jz2016507

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Gray H. B., 2009, Nature Chem., 1, 7, 10.1038/nchem.141 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Dotan H., 2011, Energy Environ. Sci., 4, 958, 10.1039/C0EE00570C · DOI
  3. Kanan M. W., 2008, Science, 321, 1072, 10.1126/science.1162018 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Esswein A. J., 2011, Energy Environ. Sci., 4, 499, 10.1039/C0EE00518E · DOI · Paper page
  5. Marshall A., 2007, Energy, 32, 431, 10.1016/j.energy.2006.07.014 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Trasatti S., 1980, J. Electroanal. Chem., 111, 125, 10.1016/S0022-0728(80)80084-2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cook T. R., 2010, Chem. Rev., 110, 6474, 10.1021/cr100246c · DOI · Paper page
  8. Suntivich J., 2011, Nat. Chem., 3, 546, 10.1038/nchem.1069 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Suntivich J., 2011, Science, 334, 1383, 10.1126/science.1212858 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Rossmeisl J., 2007, J. Electroanal. Chem., 607, 83, 10.1016/j.jelechem.2006.11.008 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hoertz P. G., 2007, J. Phys. Chem. B, 111, 6845, 10.1021/jp070735r · doi:10.1021/jp070735r
  12. Zhao Y. X., 2011, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2, 402, 10.1021/jz200051c · DOI · Paper page
  13. Yagi M., 2005, J. Electroanal. Chem., 579, 83, 10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.01.030 · DOI
  14. Nakagawa T., 2009, J. Phys. Chem. C, 113, 12958, 10.1021/jp9060076 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Biswas K., 2007, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 7, 1969, 10.1166/jnn.2007.750 · doi:10.1166/jnn.2007.750
  16. Hsieh C. S., 2004, Appl. Phys. Lett., 85, 3860, 10.1063/1.1812373 · doi:10.1063/1.1812373
  17. Lee S. W., 2011, Energy Environ. Sci., 4, 1972, 10.1039/c0ee00642d · DOI · Paper page
  18. Bi R. R., 2010, J. Phys. Chem. C, 114, 2448, 10.1021/jp9116563 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Min M., 2006, J. Electrochem. Soc., 153, A334, 10.1149/1.2140677 · DOI
  20. Rasten E., 2003, Electrochim. Acta, 48, 3945, 10.1016/j.electacta.2003.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Siracusano S., 2011, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36, 7822, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.080 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.080
  22. Tsuji E., 2011, Electrochim. Acta, 56, 2009, 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.11.062 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Suntivich J., 2010, J. Electrochem. Soc., 157, B1263, 10.1149/1.3456630 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mayrhofer K. J. J., 2008, Electrochim. Acta, 53, 3181, 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.11.057 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Zhang J. J., 2011, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36, 5218, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.01.131 · DOI
  26. Burke L. D., 1977, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 73, 1659, 10.1039/f19777301659 · DOI
  27. Marshall A. T., 2010, Electrochim. Acta, 55, 1978, 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.11.018 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Gorlin Y., 2010, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, 13612, 10.1021/ja104587v · DOI · Paper page
  29. Forgie R., 2010, Electrochem. Solid State Lett., 13, D36, 10.1149/1.3290735 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Burke L. D., 1972, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans 1., 68, 839, 10.1039/f19726800839 · doi:10.1039/f19726800839
  31. Loucka T., 1990, J. Appl. Electrochem., 20, 522, 10.1007/BF01076067 · doi:10.1007/bf01076067
  32. Sugawara Y., 2008, J. Electrochem. Soc., 155, B897, 10.1149/1.2945909 · doi:10.1149/1.2945909
  33. Rand D. A. J., 1974, J. Electroanal. Chem., 55, 375, 10.1016/S0022-0728(74)80431-6 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Kotz R., 1986, Electrochim. Acta, 31, 1311, 10.1016/0013-4686(86)80153-0 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Ferreira P. J., 2005, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152, A2256, 10.1149/1.2050347 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lee, Y., Suntivich, J., May, K. J., Perry, E. E., & Shao-Horn, Y.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2012-01-19
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
399-404
ISSN
1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1021/jz2016507
OpenAlex
W2015124676
Cited by
3,534
References
3
FWCI
33.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.