Cited by 159Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Smoking withdrawal dynamics: II. Improved tests of withdrawal-relapse relations

Piasecki, Thomas M., Jorenby, Douglas E., Smith, Stevens S., Fiore, Michael C., Baker, Timothy B.·2003·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

In this article, the authors assessed whether continuously scaled symptom parameters derived from growth models (T. M. Piasecki et al., 2003) are linked to smoking at long-term follow-up by using data from a large-scale clinical trial (N = 893). Results revealed that higher withdrawal intercepts, positive linear slopes, and greater volatility were all positively associated with relapse, and cigarette coefficients (indicating smoking-induced withdrawal reduction) were negatively related to relapse. In models keyed around the first lapse to smoking, those destined to lapse reported more severe withdrawal during abstinence, and withdrawal patterns discriminated groups defined according to lapse duration. The findings complement earlier heterogeneity studies in implicating the pattern of changing withdrawal symptoms over time as a factor strongly associated with smoking relapse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.112.1.14

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Withdrawal duration and severity predict relapse in abstinent human smokers.

    “Indeed, withdrawal duration and severity predict relapse in abstinent human smokers (Piasecki et al. 1998(Piasecki et al. , 2000(Piasecki et al. , 2003)).”

    From Mechanisms of Nicotine Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as Piasecki et al. 2003

  • Increased severity of nicotine withdrawal predicts increased relapse rates.

    “Nicotine withdrawal symptoms are highly variable between patients and can be quite severe, with increased severity of withdrawal being predictive of increased rates of relapse [25, 27, 128–130].”

    From Mechanistic insights into nicotine withdrawal (2011) · cites this paper as [128]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Marlatt, 1985, Relapse prevention: Theoretical rationale and overview of the model., 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piasecki, T. M., Jorenby, D. E., Smith, S. S., Fiore, M. C., & Baker, T. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2003-02
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
14-27
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W1976972165
Cited by
159
References
46
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da007580-04)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA07580-03)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA84724-02, P50CA084724)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
nicotine withdrawal, smoking relapse, growth models, abstinence, nicotine dependence
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Nicotine, Recurrence, Severity of Illness Index, Smoking, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Smoking Cessation, Bupropion, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review