Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,063

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Removing the Shadow of Suspicion: The Effects of Apology Versus Denial for Repairing Competence- Versus Integrity-Based Trust Violations.

Open access
Kim, Peter H., Ferrin, Donald L., Cooper, Cecily D., Dirks, Kurt T.·2004·Journal of Applied Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.104
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to examine the implications of an apology versus a denial for repairing trust after an alleged violation. Results reveal that trust was repaired more successfully when mistrusted parties (a) apologized for violations concerning matters of competence but denied culpability for violations concerning matters of integrity, and (b) had apologized for violations when there was subsequent evidence of guilt but had denied culpability for violations when there was subsequent evidence of innocence. Supplementary analyses also revealed that the interactive effects of violation type and violation response on participants' trusting intentions were mediated by their trusting beliefs. Combined, these findings provide needed insight and supporting evidence concerning how trust might be repaired in the aftermath of a violation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.104

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1177/001872679004300702 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Barber, 1983, The logic and limits of trust.
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.669 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.669
  4. 10.1287/orsc.13.5.497.7816 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Butler, 1984, A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates., Psychological Reports, 55, 19, 10.2466/pr0.1984.55.1.19 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Byrne, 2002, Restoring trust in corporate America: Business must lead the way to real reform., Business Week, 30
  7. Cohen, 1983, Applied regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences.
  8. Cook. New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfillment. 53 39 1980 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1348/096317999166770 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00080.x · DOI
  11. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/0167-2681(88)90038-8 · DOI
  13. 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.611 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.539 · DOI
  15. Jussim, 1996, Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy., Vol. 28, 281
  16. 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00522-8 · DOI
  17. 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Lewicki, 1996, Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships., 114, 10.4135/9781452243610.n7 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Lewicki, 2000, Trust, trust development, and trust repair.
  20. Martijn, 1992, Negativity and positivity effects in person perception and inference: Ability versus morality., European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 453, 10.1002/ejsp.2420220504 · DOI
  21. 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123 · Paper page
  22. 10.2307/259290 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.219 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1111/0162-895X.00148 · DOI
  25. Penrod. Witness confidence and witness accuracy: Assessing their forensic relation. Psychology, Public Policy, & 1 817 1995 · DOI
  26. Reeder, 1986, Revising an impression of morality., Social Cognition, 4, 1, 10.1521/soco.1986.4.1.1 · DOI
  27. 10.2307/3033792 · DOI
  28. Robinson, 1994, Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm., Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 245, 10.1002/job.4030150306 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.918 · DOI
  30. Rousseau, 1998, Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust., Academy of Management Review, 23, 393, 10.5465/AMR.1998.926617 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Schlenker, 1980, Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations.
  32. Schwartz, 1978, The effects of remorse on the reactions of a harm-doer., The British Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 293, 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1978.tb00283.x · DOI
  33. Sigal, 1988, Factors affecting perceptions of political candidates accused of sexual and financial misconduct., Political Psychology, 9, 273, 10.2307/3790956 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.273 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1037/0021-9010.80.5.587 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.5.587 · Paper page
  37. Tedeschi, 1984, Impression management and influence in the organization., Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 3, 31
  38. Tyler, 1996, Wither trust?, 1, 10.4135/9781452243610.n1 · DOI
  39. Wood, 1981, Manager behavior in a social context: The impact of impression management on attributions and disciplinary actions., Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 28, 356, 10.1016/0030-5073(81)90004-0 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T.
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2004
Volume
89
Issue
1
Pages
104-118
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
DOI
10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.104
OpenAlex
W1701983757
Cited by
1,063
References
8
FWCI
18.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.