The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motivations for prevention or promotion following social exclusion: being rejected versus being ignored
Abstract
Social exclusion evokes powerful motivations and emotions. The present studies examined how these motivations and emotions might differ following exclusion that is explicit, active, and direct (i.e., when one is rejected) versus implicit, passive, and indirect (i.e., when one is ignored). It was hypothesized that being rejected should produce a sense of social loss and lead to more prevention-focused responses, including withdrawal from social contact, thoughts about actions one should not have taken, and increased feelings of agitation. In contrast, being ignored should produce a sense of failure to achieve social gain and lead to more promotion-focused responses, including reengagement in social contact, thoughts about actions one should have taken, and increased feelings of dejection. These hypotheses were supported across 4 studies in which people recalled or underwent experiences of being rejected or ignored. Past research on active versus passive exclusion is reexamined and found to be consistent with these hypotheses as well.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We suggest that mentalizing is a reasonable cognitive response to social exclusion in our paradigm, not only because mentalizing during decisions may reflect a concern with the peers’ evaluations of one’s decisions, but also because reactions to exclusion or rejection depend on the perceived intentions of the excluder (Molden et al., 2009; Smart Richman & Leary, 2009).”
From Risk-taking and social exclusion in adolescence: neural mechanisms underlying peer influences on decision-making (2013) · cites this paper as Molden et al., 2009
Citations
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
(1969) · Cited by 18,340
Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment
Rever, G. W. (1972) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197211000-00011 · Cited by 8,446
Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.
Higgins, E. T. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.319 · Cited by 7,219
Higgins, E. T. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.12.1280 · Cited by 6,775
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
Higgins, E., & Kruglanski, A. (2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3496 · Cited by 5,535
The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472 · Cited by 5,173
Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813 · Cited by 4,273
Attachment and Loss. Vol. I. Attachment.
Jones, N. B., & Bowlby, J. (1970) · Man · doi:10.2307/2798963 · Cited by 4,208
Does Rejection Hurt? An fMRI Study of Social Exclusion
Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089134 · Cited by 3,849
Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: 1955
Feshbach, S., & Jones, M. R. (1957) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419253 · Cited by 3,842
In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.
Brewer, M. B. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307 · Cited by 3,411
Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis
Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518 · Cited by 2,519
Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet
Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748 · Cited by 2,276
A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale
Leary, M. R. (1983) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167283093007 · Cited by 2,178
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.211 · Cited by 2,094
Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making
Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.2675 · Cited by 1,990
Why Does Social Exclusion Hurt? The Relationship Between Social and Physical Pain.
MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.202 · Cited by 1,712
If you can't join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior.
Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1058 · Cited by 1,554
Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, Ö. N., & Taylor, A. M. (2001) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.27 · Cited by 1,516
Watson, D., Weber, K., Assenheimer, J. S., Clark, L. A., Strauss, M. E., & McCormick, R. A. (1995) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.104.1.3 · Cited by 1,423
Handbook of motivation science
Shah, J. Y., & Gardner, W. L. (2008) · Cited by 1,404
Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport
Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.14481 · Cited by 1,297
All Negative Moods Are Not Equal: Motivational Influences of Anxiety and Sadness on Decision Making
Raghunathan, R., & Pham, M. T. (1999) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2838 · Cited by 1,277
Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior
Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Bartels, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.56 · Cited by 1,271
Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem”
Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.42 · Cited by 1,165
Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.006 · Cited by 1,138 · cited 1×
“Each need was assessed using three separate items ( s .61–.63), which were adapted from Zadro, Williams, and Richardson (2004), and rated on 1 (not at all) to 9 (very much) scales.”
MethodLee, A. Y., Aaker, J. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1122 · Cited by 1,031
Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems.
Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J. R., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.2.276 · Cited by 970
Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator
Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515 · Cited by 878
Ostracism: the power of silence
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-4267 · Cited by 805
Interpersonal Rejection as a Determinant of Anger and Aggression
Leary, M. R., Twenge, J. M., & Quinlivan, E. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_2 · Cited by 748
Twenge, J. M., Catanese, K. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.409 · Cited by 715 · cited 1×
“Many of these previous studies did not include measures of people’s behaviors following exclusion and were primarily focused on when and how exclusion threatened people’s self-esteem, their needs for belonging, and the meaning they found in their lives (e.g., Leary et al., 1995; Twenge et al., 2003; Zadro et al., 2005…”
ResultResponses to Social Exclusion: Social Anxiety, Jealousy, Loneliness, Depression, and Low Self-Esteem
Leary, M. R. (1990) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.1990.9.2.221 · Cited by 673
Social Ostracism by Coworkers: Does Rejection Lead to Loafing or Compensation?
Williams, K. D., & Sommer, K. L. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167297237003 · Cited by 669
Social Exclusion and Selective Memory: How the Need to belong Influences Memory for Social Events
Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167200266007 · Cited by 578
When ostracism leads to aggression: The moderating effects of control deprivation
Warburton, W., Williams, K. D., & Cairns, D. R. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.005 · Cited by 573
When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts.
van Beest, I., & Williams, K. D. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.918 · Cited by 567
Reactions to acceptance and rejection: Effects of level and sequence of relational evaluation
Buckley, K. M., Winkel, R. E., & Leary, M. R. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00064-7 · Cited by 514
How Global Versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus
Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x · Cited by 501
(2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315806419 · Cited by 493
Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: What feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong.
Camacho, C. J., Higgins, E. T., & Luger, L. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.498 · Cited by 395
Regulatory focus and temporal distance
Pennington, G. L., & Roese, N. J. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00058-1 · Cited by 379
Seibt, B., & Förster, J. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.38 · Cited by 376
Williams, K. D., Forgas, J. P., & von Hippel, W. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203942888 · Cited by 363
On the outside looking in: loneliness and social monitoring
Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., Jefferis, V., & Knowles, M. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205277208 · Cited by 358
Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: Implications for attributional functions.
Liberman, N., Molden, D. C., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.5 · Cited by 353
Expectancy × value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction.
Shah, J. Y., & Higgins, E. T. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.73.3.447 · Cited by 335
Higgins, T. E., & Tykocinski, O. E. (1992) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167292185002 · Cited by 266
R U There? Ostracism by Cell Phone Text Messages.
Smith, A., & Williams, K. (2004) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.8.4.291 · Cited by 259
Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: The general impact of promotion and prevention.
Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.693 · Cited by 245
Strauman, T. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1988) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1988.tb00472.x · Cited by 221
Jealousy and the threatened self: Getting to the heart of the green-eyed monster
DeSteno, D., Valdesolo, P., & Bartlett, M. Y. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.626 · Cited by 213
Roese, N. J., Hur, T., & Pennington, G. L. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1109 · Cited by 213
Sanna, L. J., & Turley, K. J. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167296229005 · Cited by 186
Deficiency motivation and growth motivation.
Maslow, A. H. (1962) · D Van Nostrand eBooks · doi:10.1037/10793-003 · Cited by 175
Varieties of Counterfactual Thinking
Kahneman, D. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315806419-18 · Cited by 162
Riding the ‘O’ Train: Comparing the Effects of Ostracism and Verbal Dispute on Targets and Sources
Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2005) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430205051062 · Cited by 151
Pittman, T. S., & Zeigler, K. R. (2007) · Cited by 150
Tactical Differences in Coping With Rejection Sensitivity: The Role of Prevention Pride
Ayduk, Ö. N., May, D., Downey, G., & Higgins, E. T. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202250911 · Cited by 142
Promoting Us or Preventing Them: Regulatory Focus and Manifestations of Intergroup Bias
Shah, J. Y., Brazy, P. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203261888 · Cited by 138
Integration of contingency information in judgments of cause, covariation, and probability.
Mandel, D. R., & Lehman, D. R. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.127.3.269 · Cited by 113
Varieties of Interpersonal Rejection
Williams, K. D., Forgas, J. P., & Hippel, W. V. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203942888-9 · Cited by 92
Self-Guide Framing and Persuasion: Responsibly Increasing Message Processing to Ideal Levels
Evans, L. M., & Petty, R. E. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202250090 · Cited by 85
Molden, D. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2004) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.22.2.248.35461 · Cited by 79
Foundations of social cognition : a festschrift in honor of Robert S. Wyer, Jr.
Bodenhausen, G. V., & Lambert, A. J. (2004) · Psychology Press eBooks · Cited by 58
Contrastive and counterfactual reasoning in causal judgment.
McGill, A. L., & Klein, J. G. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.897 · Cited by 56
How preferences for eager versus vigilant judgment strategies affect self-serving conclusions
Molden, D. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.009 · Cited by 53
Self-discrepancies and negative affect: A primer on when to look for specificity, and how to find it
Boldero, J., Moretti, M. M., Bell, R., & Francis, J. (2005) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00049530500048730 · Cited by 50
Some effects of rejection upon attraction to a group.
Snoek, J. D. (1962) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0043320 · Cited by 31
How strategies for making judgments and decisions affect cognition: Motivated cognition revisited
Higgins, E. T., & Molden, D. C. (2003) · Cited by 29
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/664039 · Cited by 470
Wirth, J. H., Sacco, D. F., Hugenberg, K., & Williams, K. D. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167210370032 · Cited by 369
Phubbed and Alone: Phone Snubbing, Social Exclusion, and Attachment to Social Media
David, M. E., & Roberts, J. A. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/690940 · Cited by 364
Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior.
Thau, S., Derfler-Rozin, R. R., Pitesa, M., Mitchell, M. S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036708 · Cited by 319
Effectiveness of an Empathic Chatbot in Combating Adverse Effects of Social Exclusion on Mood
de Gennaro, M., Krumhuber, E. G., & Lucas, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03061 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Molden, D. C., Lucas, G. M., Gardner, W. L., Dean, K., & Knowles, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 415-431
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2158079757
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 16.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- social exclusion, rejection, prevention motivation, social loss, social benefits, social withdrawal, agitation, dejection
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rejection, Psychology, Social Alienation, Social Perception, Thinking, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review