The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018.
Abstract
This meta-analysis integrated 16 nationally representative U.S. public opinion polls on gender stereotypes (N = 30,093 adults), extending from 1946 to 2018, a span of seven decades that brought considerable change in gender relations, especially in women's roles. In polls inquiring about communion (e.g., affectionate, emotional), agency (e.g., ambitious, courageous), and competence (e.g., intelligent, creative), respondents indicated whether each trait is more true of women or men, or equally true of both. Women's relative advantage in communion increased over time, but men's relative advantage in agency showed no change. Belief in competence equality increased over time, along with belief in female superiority among those who indicated a sex difference in competence. Contemporary gender stereotypes thus convey substantial female advantage in communion and a smaller male advantage in agency but also gender equality in competence along with some female advantage. Interpretation emphasizes the origins of gender stereotypes in the social roles of women and men. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These differences may be attributed to societal processes and organizational norms that assign women to tasks more highly associated with communion (i.e., teaching and service) and men to tasks more highly associated with agency (i.e., research) (e.g., Eagly et al., 2020).”
From Faculty Time Expenditure Across Research, Teaching, and Service: Do Gender Differences Persist? (2023) · cites this paper as Eagly et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 · Cited by 7,364
From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0 · Cited by 3,424
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692 · Cited by 2,756
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(07)00002-0 · Cited by 2,682
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012) · Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781446249222.n49 · Cited by 1,853
Self-citationAre leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0023557 · Cited by 1,748
Self-citationThe Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market*
Deming, D. J. (2017) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjx022 · Cited by 1,727
Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words.
Anderson, N. H. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025907 · Cited by 1,668
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,000
Romantic Relationships Matter More to Men than to Women
Wahring, I. V., Simpson, J. A., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2024) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x24001365 · Cited by 38
“As revealed by a recent meta-analysis (Eagly et al., 2020), the ascription of communal traits such as emotionality and sensitivity to women versus men has increased since the 1940s.”
Hu, L., & Kearney, M. W. (2020) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x20969752 · Cited by 39
“However, with the increasing number of women entering the job market and labor force, women’s social roles might be no longer limited in family and community (Eagly et al., 2020).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGender role (in-)congruity and resource-provider gender biases: a conceptual model
Tonoyan, V., & Strohmeyer, R. (2021) · International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1108/ijge-12-2020-0201 · Cited by 35
Constituents Ask Female Legislators to Do More
Butler, D. M., Naurin, E., & Öhberg, P. (2022) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/719631 · Cited by 32
Jin, E., & Eastin, M. S. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2279402 · Cited by 33
“For example, society perceives men as more competent, agentic, and self-centered, whereas females are weak, emotional, and warm (Eagly et al., 2020; Huddy & Terkildsen, 1993).”
Measuring implicit intergroup biases
Lai, C. K., & Wilson, M. E. (2020) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12573 · Cited by 41
Evaluations of abusive supervisors: The moderating role of the abuser's gender
Kim, J. K., Harold, C. M., & Holtz, B. C. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2581 · Cited by 33
Zhao, S., Setoh, P., Storage, D., & Cimpian, A. (2022) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13809 · Cited by 33
Toward Gender Equality in Education—Teachers’ Beliefs about Gender and Math
Lindner, J., Makarova, E., Bernhard, D., & Brovelli, D. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12060373 · Cited by 41
“As research has shown, gender attitudes, particularly the role of women, changed significantly during the past 70 years [83].”
Women’s Orgasm and Its Relationship with Sexual Satisfaction and Well-being
Dienberg, M.-F., Oschatz, T., Piemonte, J. L., & Klein, V. (2023) · Current Sexual Health Reports · doi:10.1007/s11930-023-00371-0 · Cited by 30
Mommersteeg, P. M. C., van Valkengoed, I. G. M., Lodder, P., Juster, R., & Kupper, N. H. M. (2023) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/13591053231207294 · Cited by 30
“Feminine gender roles include profiles stereo-typically considered feminine, such as being sympathetic, sensitive to others’ needs, gentle, and warm, which is summarized as “commun-ion” thus orienting to well-being of others (Eagly et al., 2020).”
Lost opportunities: How gendered arrangements harm men
Bareket, O., & Fiske, S. T. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2320788122 · Cited by 34
“This creates a gender - role imbalance: Women are embracing agentic roles, but men’s engagement in communal roles lags (8, 92).”
Riegle‐Crumb, C., & Peng, M. (2021) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.1177/00380407211014777 · Cited by 42
Structure learning principles of stereotype change
Gershman, S. J., & Cikara, M. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02252-y · Cited by 34
Kosakowska‐Berezecka, N., Sawicki, A. J., Celikkol, G. C., Bosson, J. K., van Laar, C., Rossum, A. V., Best, D. L., Jurek, P., Besta, T., Olech, M., et al. (2024) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506231221913 · Cited by 29
“Societal gender stereotypes help to perpetuate gender differences by leading people to treat men and women differently and ‘‘guiding’’ women and men to behave in line with societal expectations (Eagly et al., 2020; Prentice & Carranza, 2002).”
Diversifying Gender Categories and the Sex/Gender System
Ridgeway, C. L., & Saperstein, A. (2024) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-035327 · Cited by 37
Fu, P., Gao, C., Chen, X., Zhang, Z., Chen, J., & Yang, D. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-79776-3 · Cited by 43
“Although scholars have found that the gender gap was diminishing globally 83 , for instance, Eagly and colleague 83 did a meta-analysis on the changes in gender roles and opinions across seven decades and found a considerable change in gender relations, especially in women’s roles.”
“Just as good”: Learning gender stereotypes from attempts to counteract them.
Chestnut, E. K., Zhang, M. Y., & Markman, E. M. (2020) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0001143 · Cited by 29
Lyubomirsky, S. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211055369 · Cited by 34
Stereotypes of Women and Men Across Gender Subgroups
Bye, H. H., Соляник, В. В., Five, M., & Agai, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.881418 · Cited by 33
“The competence dimension may be viewed as a facet of agency, which also encompasses traits related more to assertiveness (Abele et al., 2016; Eagly et al., 2020).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKark, R., & Buengeler, C. (2024) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/15480518241257105 · Cited by 48
“It puts forward women ’ s stereotypical interpersonal characteristics (e.g., sensitive, emotional; Eagly et al., 2020), their communal and nurturing capability and motherhood roles, stressing the contribution of women ’ s “ ethics of care ” to organizational effectiveness (Calás & Smircich, 2016)…”
Real Men Don’t Buy “Mrs. Clean”: Gender Bias in Gendered Brands
Spielmann, N., Dobscha, S., & Lowrey, T. M. (2020) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/713188 · Cited by 28
“Recent longitudinal research shows that while some gender stereotypes have changed in the past 70 years (Eagly et al. 2019), with women being perceived as increasingly more competent, men continue to be perceived as more agentic than women.”
BackgroundHow Classmates’ Gender Stereotypes Affect Students’ Math Self-Concepts: A Multilevel Analysis
Wolff, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.599199 · Cited by 36
“Given that gender stereotypes have changed across the decades (e.g., Eagly et al., 2020), this up-to-datedness of the analyzed data can be seen as a strength of this study.”
BackgroundDutz, R., Hubner, S., & Peus, C. V. (2021) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12470 · Cited by 29
Boettcher, C., Tittel, S. R., Meißner, T., Gohlke, B. C., Stachow, R., Dost, A., Wunderlich, S., Lowack, I., & Lanzinger, S. (2021) · BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care · doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002494 · Cited by 28
A gender gap in managerial span of control: Implications for the gender pay gap
Lee, M., & Kray, L. J. (2021) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.06.001 · Cited by 29
A New Perspective on Gender Bias in the Upper Echelons: Why Stakeholder Variability Matters
Joshi, A., Oh, S. S., & DesJardine, M. R. (2022) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2021.0131 · Cited by 27
Dormanen, R., Sanders, C. S., Maffly‐Kipp, J., Smith, J. L., & Vess, M. (2020) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684320947648 · Cited by 31
“…likely to be stereotypically associated with men than women, a pattern that has remained stable across at least the last 7 decades in the United States (Eagly et al., 2019) and reflects the qualities that people infer from the social roles that women and men typically hold (Eagly & Wood, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialZentner, M. R., & von Aufsess, C. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720003645 · Cited by 26
Henningsen, L., Eagly, A. H., & Jonas, K. W. (2021) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12780 · Cited by 28
“Based on the observed behaviors of women and men in these typical roles, people infer that women are more other- oriented or communal (e.g., cooperative and warm), whereas men are more self- oriented or agentic (e.g., ambitious and competitive; Eagly et al., 2020; Hentschel et al., 2019).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThree Perspectives on Changing Gender Stereotypes
Priyashantha, K. G., Alwis, D., & Welmilla, I. (2021) · FIIB Business Review · doi:10.1177/23197145211049604 · Cited by 26
Likeability versus Competence Dilemma: Text Mining Approach Using LinkedIn Data
Erfani, A., Hickey, P. J., & Cui, Q. (2023) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/jmenea.meeng-5213 · Cited by 27
Virtual first impressions: Zoom backgrounds affect judgements of trust and competence
Cook, A., Thompson, M., & Ross, P. D. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0291444 · Cited by 28
“A recent meta-analysis of gender stereotype public opinion polls demonstrated a profound social trend of increasing belief in gender competence equality, along with a decided female superiority among those who indicated a sex difference in competence [89].”
BackgroundStewart‐Williams, S., Chang, C. Y. M., Wong, X. L., Blackburn, J. D., & Thomas, A. G. (2020) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12463 · Cited by 29
Empirically Derived Guidelines for Effect Size Interpretation in Social PsychologyPreprint
Lovakov, A. V., & Рафиковна, А. Е. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2epc4 · Cited by 37
Oberst, U., De Quintana, M., Del Cerro, S., & Chamarro, A. (2021) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-06-2020-0356 · Cited by 32
Gender Stereotypes in Hollywood Movies and Their Evolution over Time: Insights from Network Analysis
Kumar, A. M., Goh, J. Y. Q., Tan, T. H. H., & Siew, C. S. Q. (2022) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc6020050 · Cited by 25
An Exploratory Study of Gender Role Stress and Psychological Distress of Women in Kosovo
Kelmendi, K., & Jemini-Gashi, L. (2022) · Women's Health · doi:10.1177/17455057221097823 · Cited by 26
Gender differences in the relationship between presenteeism and extra‐role behaviors
Luksyte, A., Unsworth, K. L., Avery, D. R., Cordery, J. L., & Seah, J. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2651 · Cited by 29
Rogova, N., & Matta, S. (2022) · AMS Review · doi:10.1007/s13162-022-00237-z · Cited by 25
Rajkó, A., Herendy, C., Goyanes, M., & Demeter, M. (2023) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502221124389 · Cited by 25
“…roles and family responsibilities (Stack, 2004), career absences (Cameron et al., 2016), resource allocation (Duch et al., 2012), role stereotypes (Eagly et al., 2020; Knobloch-Westerwick et al., 2013; Shen, 2013), the gendered nature of the labor market and the distribution of salaries (Block et…”
Gender stereotypes about math anxiety: Ability and emotional components
Justicia‐Galiano, M. J., Martín‐Puga, M. E., Linares, R., & Pelegrina, S. (2023) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102316 · Cited by 45
Sport–gender stereotypes and their impact on impression evaluations
Liu, Z., Shentu, M., Xue, Y., Yin, Y., Wang, Z., Tang, L., Yu, Z., & Zheng, W. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-02132-9 · Cited by 40
Gender as Embedded Social Cognition
Diekman, A. B., & Schmader, T. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197763414.013.17 · Cited by 31
Manzi, F., Caleo, S., & Heilman, M. E. (2024) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101928 · Cited by 24
Venard, G., Zimmermann, G., Antonietti, J., Nunes, C. E., & Petegem, S. V. (2024) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-024-02945-5 · Cited by 32
Hidden in Plain Sight: The Inconsistent Gender Gaps in STEM and Leadership
Eagly, A. H. (2021) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2021.1930764 · Cited by 31
Self-citationDoctoral Program in Natural Science Education, U. S. M., Chusni, M. M., Saputro, S., Doctoral Program in Natural Science Education, U. S. M., Suranto, S., Doctoral Program in Natural Science Education, U. S. M., Rahardjo, S. B., & Doctoral Program in Natural Science Education, U. S. M. (2021) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2022.15153a · Cited by 24
Nandkeolyar, A. K., Bagger, J., & Ekkirala, S. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.066 · Cited by 25
Harrington, A. G., Overall, N. C., & Maxwell, J. A. (2022) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-022-01305-1 · Cited by 24
Muradoglu, M., Arnold, S. H., Leslie, S., & Cimpian, A. (2023) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214231173361 · Cited by 27
“5 Although stereotypes do change over time (e.g., Charlesworth & Banaji, 2022; Eagly et al., 2020), they are often unresponsive to targeted interventions (e.g., Forscher et al., 2019).”
BackgroundTopor, M. K., Pickering, J. S., Mendes, A. B., Bishop, D., Büttner, F., Elsherif, M. M., Evans, T. R., Henderson, E. L., Kalandadze, T., Nitschke, F., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z · Cited by 24
Gender equity in hiring: examining the effectiveness of a personality-based algorithm
Kubiak, E., Efremova, M. I., Baron, S., & Frasca, K. J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1219865 · Cited by 27
“Research dating back as far as the 1970s (see Davison and Burke, 2000 for a review, which covers multiple countries) has shown that gender discrimination in hiring occurs, and continues to be a prevalent issue in today’s hiring practices–despite the findings from cross-temporal meta-analysis indicating that belief in…”
BackgroundExploring Current Gender Meanings: Creating a New Gender Identity Scale
Stets, J. E., Kushida, M., Fares, P., & Whitham, M. M. (2023) · Frontiers in sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32986-9_5 · Cited by 23
The Cost of Debating Harassment Against Politicians: Are Women and Men Affected Equally?
Håkansson, S., & Grahn, M. (2025) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-025-10039-1 · Cited by 23
“Moreover, raising attention to this issue might activate pre-existing stereotypes (see Kunda and Spencer 2003) about women’s emotional, weak and overly sensitive nature (Bauer 2015; Brescoll 2016; Eagly et al. 2020; Huddy and Capelos 2002).”
Does Happiness Launch More Businesses? Affect, Gender, and Entrepreneurial Intention
SWEIDA, G. L., & Sherman, C. L. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17186908 · Cited by 28
Promoting Gender Equality by Supporting Men’s Emotional Flexibility
Croft, A., Atkinson, C., & May, A. M. (2021) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732220984491 · Cited by 23
“Moreover, women continue to do disproportionately more than men at home (Croft, Schmader, et al., 2014, 2015; Eagly et al., 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Glass Wall and the Gendered Evaluation of Role Expansion in Freelancing Careers
Lee, Y. G., Koval, C. Z., & Lee, S. S. (2022) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2020.1176 · Cited by 24
Hudson, S. T. J., & Ghani, A. (2023) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/03616843231187851 · Cited by 28
“First, we hypothesized that despite increases in women ’ s representation in men-dominated spaces, gender normative stereotypes still exist (Prentice & Carranza, 2002), an expectation that has been corroborated by recent longitudinal and big-data work on gender descriptive stereotypes (Charlesworth et al., 2021; Haine…”
BackgroundInfluentialJaśko, K., Pyrkosz‐Pacyna, J., Czarnek, G., Dukała, K., & Szastok, M. (2020) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12392 · Cited by 30
Haselmayer, M., Dingler, S., & Jenny, M. (2021) · Parliamentary Affairs · doi:10.1093/pa/gsab045 · Cited by 23
Tost, L. P., Hardin, A. E., Roberson, J. W., & Gino, F. (2021) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2020.0339 · Cited by 25
Stengård, J., Mellner, C., Toivanen, S., & Nyberg, A. (2021) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-021-01261-2 · Cited by 27
Economic inequality shapes the agency–communion content of gender stereotypes
Moreno‐Bella, E., Willis, G. B., Quiroga-Garza, A., & Moya, M. (2022) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302221095338 · Cited by 22
“Although gender stereotypes are dynamic and changing (Eagly et al., 2020; Haines et al., 2016), men are still perceived as more agentic than communal—although some data have not supported this difference (Moya & Moya-Garófano, 2021)—whereas women are considered more communal than agentic in most…”
ResultIntersectional Complexity in Stereotype Content
Heiserman, N. (2023) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/728051 · Cited by 27
“Thislends some support to recent research fi nding that explicit gender stereotypes regarding intelligence have waned while agency stereotypes remain (Eagly et al. 2019).”
ResultLiu, M., Xie, Z., Yang, A. J., Yu, C., Xu, J., Ding, Y., & Bu, Y. (2024) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103743 · Cited by 24
“STEM fields, in particular, are often perceived as male-dominated, and gender stereotypes about the roles and abilities of female scientists remain deeply ingrained within academia (Carli et al., 2016; Eagly et al., 2020).”
BackgroundErnst, M. M., Kogan, B. A., & Lee, P. A. (2020) · Journal of Pediatric Urology · doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.06.026 · Cited by 22
Krahé, B., Uhlmann, A., & Herzberg, M. (2021) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000441 · Cited by 21
The effect of gender stereotypes on young girls’ intuitive number sense
Gonzalez, A. M., Odic, D., Schmader, T., Block, K., & Baron, A. S. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258886 · Cited by 21
“It might reflect the fact that gender stereotypes about intelligence have been favoring girls over time [16, 17] or that children at this young age have not yet been exposed to stereotypic beliefs about girls and math.”
BackgroundSczesny, S., Nater, C., & Haines, S. (2021) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12845 · Cited by 21
Self-citationLin, H., & Bu, N. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.909439 · Cited by 23
“Gray prediction and pattern recognition are employed to predict the trend of public opinion (Eagly et al., 2020).”
Method“I Ain’t No Girl”: Exploring Gender Stereotypes in the Video Game Community
Robinson, J. A. (2022) · Western Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/10570314.2022.2130004 · Cited by 21
“Traditionally, society expects women to be high in communion (orientation toward people and emotions), while society expects men to be high in agency (orientation toward the self and personal goal achievement) (Bem, 1993; Eagly et al., 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialMore guilty if woman: The role of gender and causal attribution in political scandals’ impact
Cucchi, S., & Cavazza, N. (2020) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2020.1779641 · Cited by 21
“This is in line with the finding that the gap between men and women increased over time as concerns the attribution of communion traits, whereas it is stable as concerns the attribution of agentic traits (Eagly et al., 2019).”
ResultSuwarno, S., Triyono, S., Ashadi, A., & Sahayu, W. (2021) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-021-09870-5 · Cited by 42
Stajkovic, K. S., & Stajković, A. D. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05564-0 · Cited by 27
“Alternatively, strengthening stereotypes associating women as communal (Eagly et al., 2020) may prompt women to intentionally conform to norms and avoid back-lash by leading in more caring ways.”
Gender Stereotypes in Student Evaluations of Teaching
Renström, E. A., Sendén, M. G., & Lindqvist, A. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.571287 · Cited by 20
López‐Zafra, E., & García‐Retamero, R. (2021) · International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social · doi:10.1080/02134748.2021.1882227 · Cited by 20
Lou, X., Li, L. M. W., Xia, W., & Zhu, Q. (2022) · Anthropocene · doi:10.1016/j.ancene.2022.100335 · Cited by 20
Gender role stereotypes at work in humanoid robots
Parlangeli, O., Palmitesta, P., Bracci, M., Marchigiani, E., & Guidi, S. (2022) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2150565 · Cited by 22
“The stereo-type of males retained the relative advantage referable to agency (e.g. ambitious, courageous), while beliefs related to an equality of competence (e.g. intelligent, creative) between the two genders have increased over time (Eagly et al. 2019).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLooks Like a Leader: Measuring Evolution in Gendered Politician Stereotypes
van der Pas, D., Aaldering, L., & Bos, A. L. (2023) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-023-09888-5 · Cited by 26
“At the same time, women’s relative advantage over men on communal traits increased (Eagly et al., 2020).”
InfluentialGender Bias Impacts Top-Merited Candidates
Andersson, E. R., Hagberg, C. E., & Hägg, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2021.594424 · Cited by 24
Ruel, S., & Jaegler, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13126907 · Cited by 20
Boosting children’s math self-efficacy by enriching their growth mindsets and gender-fair beliefs
Lee, J., Lee, H. J., & Bong, M. (2021) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2021.1932156 · Cited by 26
Rouchitsas, A., & Alm, H. (2023) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti7020010 · Cited by 22
Daldrop, C., Buengeler, C., & Homan, A. C. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1204547 · Cited by 28
“, ambitious, self-directed; Francioli and North, 2021) and men (e.g., assertive, agentic; Eagly et al., 2020) may overlap, resulting in a more amplified age bias toward the intersectional category of young men (compared to young women).”
BackgroundKindermann, B., Hocker, A., & Strese, S. (2023) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13011 · Cited by 20
Stereotypes versus preferences: Revisiting the role of alpha males in leadership
Wiezel, A., Barlev, M., Martos, C. R., & Kenrick, D. T. (2024) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.01.001 · Cited by 27
Bear, J. B. (2021) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/03616843211003070 · Cited by 20
Menegatti, M., Pireddu, S., Crocetti, E., Moscatelli, S., & Rubini, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658424 · Cited by 18
Uncovering gender bias in attitudes towards financial advisors
Klein, G., Shtudiner, Z., & Zwilling, M. (2021) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.06.040 · Cited by 21
The mitigating effect of desiring status on social backlash against ambitious women
Mishra, S., & Kray, L. J. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104355 · Cited by 19
From imposter fears to authenticity: a typology of women entrepreneurs
Chadwick, I. C., & Dawson, A. (2023) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-023-00795-x · Cited by 21
“…being competitive, a risk taker; Ahl, 2006; Jennings et al., 2013), which creates tensions for women entrepreneurs who are also expected to behave in “feminine” ways in line with the traditional norms of their gender identity (e.g., being communal, caring; Eagly et al., 2020; Ritter & Yoder, 2004).”
Dinhof, K., & Willems, J. (2023) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13703 · Cited by 20
Gendered Beliefs in STEM Undergraduates: A Comparative Analysis of Fuzzy Rating versus Likert Scales
Castaño, A. M., Lubiano, M. A., & Izquierdo, A. L. G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12156227 · Cited by 17
Nett, N., Nett, T., Englert, J., & Gaschler, R. (2021) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12761 · Cited by 23
“Agentic attributes are more strongly associated with men than with women, whereas communal attributes are more strongly associated with women than with men (Bakan, 1966; Eagly, 2013; Eagly & JohannesenSchmidt, 2001; Eagly & Karau, 2002; Eagly et al., 2020).”
BackgroundResultBegeny, C. T., Wong, C. Y., Kirby, T. A., & Rink, F. A. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.450 · Cited by 29
Allan, K., Azcona, J., Sripada, S. G., Leontidis, G., Sutherland, C. A. M., Phillips, L. H., & Martin, D. S. (2025) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.241472 · Cited by 19
Pireddu, S., Bongiorno, R., Ryan, M. K., Rubini, M., & Menegatti, M. (2021) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12501 · Cited by 19
The Social Perception of Autonomous Delivery Vehicles Based on the Stereotype Content Model
Pröbster, M., & Marsden, N. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15065194 · Cited by 18
Tavoletti, E., Bernhard, T., Dong, L., & Taras, V. (2023) · Journal of International Management · doi:10.1016/j.intman.2023.101029 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Bern (CH)
- American Institutes for Research (US)
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-315
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2961388998
- Cited by
- 1,136
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 175 · 2025: 201 · 2024: 205 · 2023: 175 · 2022: 180 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 63
- FWCI
- 19.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Swiss National Science Foundation (P0BEP1_162210)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Keywords
- gender stereotypes, public opinion, cross-temporal change, gender roles, women's roles, gender equality, female superiority, competence, social roles, United States
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Public Opinion, Stereotyping, United States, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Femininity, Masculinity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review