Cited by 13,174Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species

Open access
Butler, Andrew, Hoffman, Paul, Smibert, Peter, Papalexi, Efthymia, Satija, Rahul·2018·Nature Biotechnology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Computational single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) methods have been successfully applied to experiments representing a single condition, technology, or species to discover and define cellular phenotypes. However, identifying subpopulations of cells that are present across multiple data sets remains challenging. Here, we introduce an analytical strategy for integrating scRNA-seq data sets based on common sources of variation, enabling the identification of shared populations across data sets and downstream comparative analysis. We apply this approach, implemented in our R toolkit Seurat (http://satijalab.org/seurat/), to align scRNA-seq data sets of peripheral blood mononuclear cells under resting and stimulated conditions, hematopoietic progenitors sequenced using two profiling technologies, and pancreatic cell 'atlases' generated from human and mouse islets. In each case, we learn distinct or transitional cell states jointly across data sets, while boosting statistical power through integrated analysis. Our approach facilitates general comparisons of scRNA-seq data sets, potentially deepening our understanding of how distinct cell states respond to perturbation, disease, and evolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.4096

Cites

81 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Zhou, F. & Torre, F. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22; NIPS 2009 (eds. Y. Bengio, Y., Schuurmans, D., Lafferty, J.D., Williams, C.K.I. & Culotta, A.) https://papers.nips.cc/paper/3728-canonical-time-warping-for-alignment-of-human-behavior (Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc., 2009).
  2. Wang, C. & Mahadevan, S. in Proc. Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2 (ed. Walsh, T.) 1541–1546 (AAAI, 2011).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E., & Satija, R.
Affiliations
New York Genome Center (US)
Corresponding author
Satija, Rahul
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2018-04-02
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
411-420
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2794480084
Cited by
13,174
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 1297 · 2025: 1838 · 2024: 2118 · 2023: 1918 · 2022: 1783 · 2021: 1824 · 2020: 1416 · 2019: 760 · 2018: 205
FWCI
381.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1342536)
  • National Institutes of Health (1dp2hg009623-01)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (DP2-HG-009623)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Seurat, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, hematopoietic progenitor cells, pancreatic islets, cell state transitions, statistical power
MeSH terms
Data Analysis, Animals, Humans, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Software, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Computers, Molecular, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review