The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair
Abstract
The essential checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for cell-cycle delays after DNA damage or blocked DNA replication. However, it is unclear whether Chk1 is involved in the repair of damaged DNA. Here we establish that Chk1 is a key regulator of genome maintenance by the homologous recombination repair (HRR) system. Abrogation of Chk1 function with small interfering RNA or chemical antagonists inhibits HRR, leading to persistent unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and cell death after replication inhibition with hydroxyurea or DNA-damage caused by camptothecin. After hydroxyurea treatment, the essential recombination repair protein RAD51 is recruited to DNA repair foci performing a vital role in correct HRR. We demonstrate that Chk1 interacts with RAD51, and that RAD51 is phosphorylated on Thr 309 in a Chk1-dependent manner. Consistent with a functional interplay between Chk1 and RAD51, Chk1-depleted cells failed to form RAD51 nuclear foci after exposure to hydroxyurea, and cells expressing a phosphorylation-deficient mutant RAD51(T309A) were hypersensitive to hydroxyurea. These results highlight a crucial role for the Chk1 signalling pathway in protecting cells against lethal DNA lesions through regulation of HRR.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Both Chk1 and Chk2 regulate the functional associations between BRCA1, BRCA2, and Rad51 proteins in response to DNA damage, and thus promote HR-mediated repair of stalled replication forks [27, 28].”
From NER initiation factors, DDB2 and XPC, regulate UV radiation response by recruiting ATR and ATM kinases to DNA damage sites (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, both the ATR-Chk1 and ATM-Chk2 pathways regulate HR-mediated repair of collapsed replication forks [27, 28].”
From NER initiation factors, DDB2 and XPC, regulate UV radiation response by recruiting ATR and ATM kinases to DNA damage sites (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“activated Chk1 phosphorylates its own substrates such as protein Rad51, which is involved in the DSB repair by HR [193–195]”
From Functional interplay between ATM/ATR-mediated DNA damage response and DNA repair pathways in oxidative stress (2014) · cites this paper as [195]
Citations
Cites
Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases
Abraham, R. T. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.914401 · Cited by 1,966
Liu, Q., Guntuku, S., Cui, X.-S., Matsuoka, S., Cortez, D., Tamai, K., Luo, G., Carattini-Rivera, S., DeMayo, F., Bradley, A., et al. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.12.1448 · Cited by 1,625
Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer
Bartek, J., & Lukas, J. (2003) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00110-7 · Cited by 1,513
Sensing and repairing DNA double-strand breaks
Jackson, S. P. (2002) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/23.5.687 · Cited by 1,149
ATR-Mediated Checkpoint Pathways Regulate Phosphorylation and Activation of Human Chk1
Zhao, H., & Piwnica-Worms, H. (2001) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.21.13.4129-4139.2001 · Cited by 1,091
(1999) · PubMed · Cited by 1,030
Molecular views of recombination proteins and their control
West, S. C. (2003) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1127 · Cited by 977
ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality
Brown, E. J., & Baltimore, D. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.4.397 · Cited by 951
Rad51‐deficient vertebrate cells accumulate chromosomal breaks prior to cell death
Sonoda, E., Sasaki, M., Buerstedde, J., Bezzubova, O., Shinohara, A., Ogawa, H., Takata, M., Yamaguchi-Iwai, Y., & Takeda, S. (1998) · EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.2.598 · Cited by 860
Targeted disruption of the Rad51 gene leads to lethality in embryonic mice.
Tsuzuki, T., Fujii, Y., Sakumi, K., Tominaga, Y., Nakao, K., Sekiguchi, M., Matsushiro, A., Yoshimura, Y., & MoritaT (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.13.6236 · Cited by 792
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Ciccia, A., & Elledge, S. J. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019 · Cited by 4,368
DNA repair pathways as targets for cancer therapy
Helleday, T., Petermann, E., Lundin, C., Hodgson, B., & Sharma, R. A. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2342 · Cited by 1,666
Self-citationDNA Damage Sensing by the ATM and ATR Kinases
Marechal, A., & Zou, L. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012716 · Cited by 1,514
McCabe, N., Turner, N. C., Lord, C. J., Kluzek, K., Białkowska, A., Swift, S., Giavara, S., O’Connor, M. J., Tutt, A. N. J., Zdzienicka, M. Z., et al. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0140 · Cited by 1,311
The ATM–Chk2 and ATR–Chk1 Pathways in DNA Damage Signaling and Cancer
Smith, J., Tho, L. M., Xu, N., & Gillespie, D. A. (2010) · Advances in cancer research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-380888-2.00003-0 · Cited by 1,331
Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle
Branzei, D., & Foiani, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2351 · Cited by 1,228
Regulation of Homologous Recombination in Eukaryotes
Heyer, W.-D., Ehmsen, K. T., & Liu, J. (2010) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955 · Cited by 1,066
ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks
Jazayeri, A., Falck, J., Lukas, C., Bartek, J., Smith, G. C. M., Lukas, J., & Jackson, S. P. (2006) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1337 · Cited by 1,064
Petermann, E., Orta, M. L., Issaeva, N., Schultz, N., & Helleday, T. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.021 · Cited by 815
Self-citationOpportunities and challenges of radiotherapy for treating cancer
Schaue, D., & McBride, W. H. (2015) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.120 · Cited by 784
Homologous recombination and its regulation
Krejčí, L., Altmannová, V., Spirek, M., & Zhao, X. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks270 · Cited by 706
Roles of Chk1 in cell biology and cancer therapy
Zhang, Y., & Hunter, T. (2014) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.28226 · Cited by 462
ATM-mediated stabilization of ZEB1 promotes DNA damage response and radioresistance through CHK1
Zhang, P., Wei, Y., Wang, L., Debeb, B. G., Yuan, Y., Zhang, J., Yuan, J., Wang, M., Chen, D., Sun, Y., et al. (2014) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3013 · Cited by 462
New Insights into Checkpoint Kinase 1 in the DNA Damage Response Signaling Network
Dai, Y., & Grant, S. (2010) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-1029 · Cited by 448
Targeting replication stress in cancer therapy
da Costa, A. A. B. A., Chowdhury, D., Shapiro, G. I., D’Andrea, A. D., & Konstantinopoulos, P. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-022-00558-5 · Cited by 380
ATR/CHK1 inhibitors and cancer therapy
Qiu, Z., Oleinick, N. L., & Zhang, J. (2017) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.043 · Cited by 390
RTEL1 Maintains Genomic Stability by Suppressing Homologous Recombination
Barber, L. J., Youds, J. L., Ward, J. D., McIlwraith, M. J., O'Neil, N. J., Petalcorin, M. I. R., Martin, J. S., Collis, S. J., Cantor, S. B., Auclair, M., et al. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.016 · Cited by 369
Thompson, L. H. (2012) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.06.002 · Cited by 357
DNA damage checkpoint kinases in cancer
Smith, H. L., Southgate, H. E. D., Tweddle, D. A., & Curtin, N. J. (2020) · Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1017/erm.2020.3 · Cited by 328
Checkpoint kinase 1 in DNA damage response and cell cycle regulation
Patil, M., Pabla, N., & Dong, Z. (2013) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-013-1307-3 · Cited by 317
Sørensen, C. S., & Syljuåsen, R. G. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr697 · Cited by 329
Self-citationRAD18 transmits DNA damage signalling to elicit homologous recombination repair
Huang, J., Huen, M. S. Y., Kim, H., Leung, C. C. Y., Glover, J. N. M., Yu, X., & Chen, J. (2009) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1865 · Cited by 308
Beck, H., Nähse, V., Larsen, M. S. Y., O’Hanlon, K. A., Patzke, S., Holmberg, C., Mejlvang, J., Groth, A., Nielsen, O., Syljuåsen, R. G., et al. (2012) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00412-12 · Cited by 320
Self-citationExploiting replicative stress to treat cancer
Dobbelstein, M., & Sørensen, C. S. (2015) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4553 · Cited by 310
Self-citationMorgan, M. A., Parsels, L. A., Zhao, L., Parsels, J. D., Davis, M. A., Hassan, M. C., Arumugarajah, S., Hylander-Gans, L., Morosini, D., Simeone, D. M., et al. (2010) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-3573 · Cited by 299
Mladenov, E., Magin, S., Soni, A., & Iliakis, G. E. (2013) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2013.00113 · Cited by 308
Repair of Topoisomerase I‐Mediated DNA Damage
Pommier, Y. G., Barceló, J. M., Rao, V. A., Sordet, O., Jobson, A. G., Thibaut, L., Miao, Z., Seiler, J. A., Zhang, H., Marchand, C., et al. (2006) · Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology · doi:10.1016/s0079-6603(06)81005-6 · Cited by 307
Homologous recombination in cancer development, treatment and development of drug resistance
Helleday, T. (2010) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgq064 · Cited by 296
Self-citationWee1 kinase as a target for cancer therapy
Do, K. T., Doroshow, J. H., & Kummar, S. (2013) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.26062 · Cited by 279
DNA Damage Response Genes and the Development of Cancer Metastasis
Broustas, C. G., & Lieberman, H. B. (2014) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr13515.1 · Cited by 284
GSK-3β in DNA repair, apoptosis, and resistance of chemotherapy, radiotherapy of cancer
Lin, J., Song, T., Li, C., & Mao, W. (2020) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118659 · Cited by 282
DNA Damage Response: Three Levels of DNA Repair Regulation
Sirbu, B. M., & Cortez, D. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012724 · Cited by 272
Death by releasing the breaks: CHK1 inhibitors as cancer therapeutics
Ma, C. X., Janetka, J. W., & Piwnica-Worms, H. M. (2010) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2010.10.009 · Cited by 276
DNA damage kinase signaling: checkpoint and repair at 30 years
Lanz, M. C., Dibitetto, D., & Smolka, M. B. (2019) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2019101801 · Cited by 270
Mailand, N., Bekker-Jensen, S., Bartek, J., & Lukas, J. (2006) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.06.016 · Cited by 258
Yan, S., Sorrell, M., & Berman, Z. (2014) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-014-1666-4 · Cited by 247
Participation of DNA repair in the response to 5-fluorouracil
Wyatt, M. D., & Wilson, D. M. (2008) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-008-8557-5 · Cited by 248
Stracker, T. H., Usui, T., & Petrini, J. H. J. (2009) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.012 · Cited by 262
Targeting the ATR-CHK1 Axis in Cancer Therapy
Rundle, S., Bradbury, A., Drew, Y., & Curtin, N. J. (2017) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers9050041 · Cited by 242
Biomarker-Guided Development of DNA Repair Inhibitors
Cleary, J. M., Aguirre, A. J., Shapiro, G. I., & D’Andrea, A. D. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.035 · Cited by 239
Replication Catastrophe: When a Checkpoint Fails because of Exhaustion
Toledo, L. I., Neelsen, K. J., & Lukas, J. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.001 · Cited by 245
The histone methyltransferase SET8 is required for S-phase progression
Jørgensen, S., Elvers, I., Trelle, M. B., Menzel, T., Eskildsen, M., Jensen, O. N., Helleday, T., Helin, K., & Sørensen, C. S. (2007) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200706150 · Cited by 225
Self-citationTrenz, K., Smith, E., Smith, S. J., & Costanzo, V. (2006) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601045 · Cited by 219
Proteasome Function Is Required for DNA Damage Response and Fanconi Anemia Pathway Activation
Jacquemont, C. F., & Taniguchi, T. (2007) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-1015 · Cited by 213
DNA repair defects in cancer and therapeutic opportunitiesPreprint
Hopkins, J. L., Lan, L., & Zou, L. (2022) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.349431.122 · Cited by 212
Peasland, A., Wang, L.-Z., Rowling, E. J., Kyle, S., Chen, T., Hopkins, A. P., Cliby, W. A., Sarkaria, J. N., Beale, G., Edmondson, R. J., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.243 · Cited by 202
Cuneo, K. C., Morgan, M. A., Sahai, V., Schipper, M. J., Parsels, L. A., Parsels, J. D., Devasia, T. P., Al-Hawaray, M., Cho, C. S., Nathan, H., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.00730 · Cited by 197
Nojima, K., Hochegger, H., Saberi, A., Fukushima, T., Kikuchi, K., Yoshimura, M., Orelli, B. J., Bishop, D. K., Hirano, S., Ohzeki, M., et al. (2005) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-1214 · Cited by 185
Chk1 and p21 Cooperate to Prevent Apoptosis during DNA Replication Fork Stress
Rodríguez, R., & Meuth, M. (2005) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e05-07-0594 · Cited by 189
Coupling of Homologous Recombination and the Checkpoint by ATR
Buisson, R., Joshi, N., Rodrigue, A., Ho, C. K., Kreuzer, J., Foo, T. K., Hardy, É. J.-L., Dellaire, G., Haas, W., Xia, B., et al. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.12.007 · Cited by 186
Bahassi, E. M., Ovesen, J. L., Riesenberg, A. L., Bernstein, W. Z., Hasty, P., & Stambrook, P. J. (2008) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2008.17 · Cited by 180
Targeting ATR as Cancer Therapy: A new era for synthetic lethality and synergistic combinations?
Bradbury, A., Hall, S., Curtin, N. J., & Drew, Y. (2019) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.107450 · Cited by 180
Ammazzalorso, F., Pirzio, L. M., Bignami, M., Franchitto, A., & Pichierri, P. (2010) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.205 · Cited by 177
DNA damage response inhibitors: Mechanisms and potential applications in cancer therapy
Carrassa, L., & Damia, G. L. M. (2017) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.08.013 · Cited by 178
Al-Minawi, A. Z., Saleh-Gohari, N., & Helleday, T. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm888 · Cited by 169
Self-citationRegulators of cyclin-dependent kinases are crucial for maintaining genome integrity in S phase
Beck, H., Nähse, V., Larsen, M. S. Y., Groth, P., Clancy, T., Lees, M. J., Jørgensen, M., Helleday, T., Syljuåsen, R. G., & Sørensen, C. S. (2010) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200905059 · Cited by 174
Self-citationCHEK again: Revisiting the development of CHK1 inhibitors for cancer therapy
McNeely, S., Beckmann, R. P., & Bence, A. K. (2013) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.10.005 · Cited by 167
Defining and Modulating ‘BRCAness’
Byrum, A. K., Vindigni, A., & Mosammaparast, N. (2019) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2019.06.005 · Cited by 164
Petermann, E., & Caldecott, K. W. (2006) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.5.19.3256 · Cited by 170
Targeting the DNA Damage Response in Cancer
Ljungman, M. E. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900047g · Cited by 164
Mechanisms of replication fork protection: a safeguard for genome stability
Errico, A., & Costanzo, V. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409238.2012.655374 · Cited by 159
Loss of autophagy causes a synthetic lethal deficiency in DNA repair
Liu, E. Y., Xu, N., O’Prey, J., Lao, L., Joshi, S., Long, J. S., O’Prey, M., Croft, D. R., Beaumatin, F., Baudot, A. D., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1409563112 · Cited by 162
Bártková, J., Tommiska, J., Oplustilova, L., Aaltonen, K., Tamminen, A., Heikkinen, T., Mistrík, M., Aittomäki, K., BLOMQVIST, C. P., Heikkilä, P., et al. (2008) · Molecular Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2008.09.007 · Cited by 164
Ayllón, V., & O’Connor, R. (2006) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210142 · Cited by 150
Reality CHEK: Understanding the biology and clinical potential of CHK1
Neizer‐Ashun, F., & Bhattacharya, R. (2020) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2020.09.016 · Cited by 152
Parsels, L. A., Morgan, M. A., Tanska, D. M., Parsels, J. D., Palmer, B. D., Booth, R. J., Denny, W. A., Canman, C. E., Kraker, A. J., Lawrence, T. S., et al. (2009) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-08-0662 · Cited by 148
Trial Watch: Targeting ATM–CHK2 and ATR–CHK1 pathways for anticancer therapy
Manic, G., Obrist, F., Sistigu, A., & Vitale, I. (2015) · Molecular & Cellular Oncology · doi:10.1080/23723556.2015.1012976 · Cited by 152
Cancer-Specific Synthetic Lethality between ATR and CHK1 Kinase Activities
Sanjiv, K., Hagenkort, A., Calderón‐Montaño, J. M., Koolmeister, T., Reaper, P. M., Mortusewicz, O., Jacques, S. A., Kuiper, R., Schultz, N., Scobie, M., et al. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.032 · Cited by 147
Self-citationTargeting Checkpoint Kinase 1 in Cancer Therapeutics
Tse, A. N., Carvajal, R. D., & Schwartz, G. K. (2007) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-2793 · Cited by 147
Chk1-Mediated Phosphorylation of FANCE Is Required for the Fanconi Anemia/BRCA Pathway
Wang, X., Kennedy, R. D., Ray, K., Stuckert, P., Ellenberger, T., & D’Andrea, A. D. (2007) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.02357-06 · Cited by 147
Sidorova, J. M., Li, N., Folch, A., & Monnat, R. J. (2008) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.7.6.5566 · Cited by 146
Tse, A. N., Rendahl, K. G., Sheikh, T. N., Cheema, H., Aardalen, K., Embry, M. G., Ma, S., Moler, E. J., Ni, Z., de Menezes, D. E. L., et al. (2007) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1424 · Cited by 145
Enhanced H2AX Phosphorylation, DNA Replication Fork Arrest, and Cell Death in the Absence of Chk1
Gagou, M. E., Zuazua‐Villar, P., & Meuth, M. (2010) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e09-07-0618 · Cited by 146
Parmar, K., Kochupurakkal, B. S., Lazaro, J., Wang, Z. C., Palakurthi, S. S., Kirschmeier, P. T., Yang, C., Sambel, L. A., Färkkilä, A., Reznichenko, E., et al. (2019) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-0448 · Cited by 143
The ATR barrier to replication-born DNA damage
Lopez-Contreras, A. J., & Fernández-Capetillo, Ó. (2010) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.012 · Cited by 148
Wagner, J. M., & Karnitz, L. M. (2009) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.109.055178 · Cited by 143
Targeting DNA repair pathway in cancer: Mechanisms and clinical application
Wang, M., Chen, S., & Ao, D. (2021) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.103 · Cited by 140
The synthetic lethality of targeting cell cycle checkpoints and PARPs in cancer treatment
Li, S., Wang, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, C., Hong, Z., & Han, Z. (2022) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-022-01360-x · Cited by 141
Mitchell, J. B., Choudhuri, R., Fabre, K. M., Sowers, A. L., Citrin, D. E., Zabludoff, S., & Cook, J. A. (2010) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-3277 · Cited by 131
ATR and H2AX cooperate in maintaining genome stability under replication stress
Chanoux, R. A., Yin, B., Urtishak, K. A., Asare, A., Bassing, C. H., & Brown, E. J. (2009) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m806739200 · Cited by 130
RFWD3-Dependent Ubiquitination of RPA Regulates Repair at Stalled Replication Forks
Elia, A. E. H., Wang, D. C., Willis, N. A., Boardman, A. P., Hajdú, I., Adeyemi, R. O., Lowry, E. L., Gygi, S. P., Scully, R., & Elledge, S. J. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.09.011 · Cited by 132
SET8 is degraded via PCNA-coupled CRL4(CDT2) ubiquitylation in S phase and after UV irradiation
Jørgensen, S., Eskildsen, M., Fugger, K., Hansen, L., Larsen, M. S. Y., Kousholt, A. N., Syljuåsen, R. G., Trelle, M. B., Jensen, O. N., Helin, K., et al. (2011) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201009076 · Cited by 128
Self-citationReplication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response
Jones, R. M., & Petermann, E. (2012) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20112100 · Cited by 140
Deans, A. J., Khanna, K. K., McNees, C. J., Mercurio, C., Heierhorst, J., & McArthur, G. A. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3945 · Cited by 125
Thompson, R. H., & Eastman, A. R. (2013) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.12139 · Cited by 122
Jekimovs, C., Bolderson, E., Suraweera, A., Adams, M. N., O'Byrne, K. J., & Richard, D. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2014.00086 · Cited by 123
Alver, R. C., Chadha, G. S., Gillespie, P. J., & Blow, J. J. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.042 · Cited by 116
DNA damage control: regulation and functions of checkpoint kinase 1
Smits, V. A. J., & Gillespie, D. A. (2015) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.13387 · Cited by 120
Paulsen, B. S., Mandal, P. K., Frock, R. L., Boyraz, B., Yadav, R., Upadhyayula, S., Gutierrez‐Martinez, P., Ebina, W., Fasth, A. L., Kirchhausen, T. L., et al. (2017) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-017-0145-2 · Cited by 117
Luo, K., Li, L., Li, Y., Wu, C., Yin, Y., Chen, Y., Deng, M., Nowsheen, S., Yuan, J., & Lou, Z. (2016) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.289439.116 · Cited by 116
HCLK2 is essential for the mammalian S-phase checkpoint and impacts on Chk1 stability
Collis, S. J., Barber, L. J., Clark, A. J., Martin, J. S., Ward, J. D., & Boulton, S. J. (2007) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1555 · Cited by 112
Nakamura, K. M., Sakai, W., Kawamoto, T., Bree, R. T., Lowndes, N. F., Takeda, S., & Taniguchi, Y. (2006) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.03.008 · Cited by 111
Targeting the Checkpoint to Kill Cancer Cells
Benada, J., & Macůrek, L. (2015) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom5031912 · Cited by 115
Overexpression of RAD51 occurs in aggressive prostatic cancer
Mitra, A., Jameson, C., Barbáchano, Y., Sánchez, L., Kote‐Jarai, Z., Peock, S., Sodha, N., Bancroft, E. K., Fletcher, A., Cooper, C., et al. (2009) · Histopathology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03448.x · Cited by 108
Sensitization of Pancreatic Cancer to Chemoradiation by the Chk1 Inhibitor MK8776
Engelke, C. G., Parsels, L. A., Qian, Y., Zhang, Q., Karnak, D. M., Robertson, J. R., Tanska, D. M., Wei, D., Davis, M. A., Parsels, J. D., et al. (2013) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-3748 · Cited by 106
Chk2-dependent phosphorylation of XRCC1 in the DNA damage response promotes base excision repair
Chou, W., Wang, H., Wong, F., Ding, S., Wu, P., Shieh, S., & Shen, C. (2008) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.229 · Cited by 104
Alabert, C., Bianco, J. N., & Pasero, P. (2009) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.75 · Cited by 104
6-Thioguanine Selectively Kills BRCA2-Defective Tumors and Overcomes PARP Inhibitor Resistance
Issaeva, N., Thomas, H. D., Djurenovic, T., Jaspers, J. E., Stoimenov, I., Kyle, S., Pedley, N., Gottipati, P., Zur, R., Sleeth, K. M., et al. (2010) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-3416 · Cited by 106
Self-citationTriple Negative Breast Cancer: A Mountain Yet to Be Scaled Despite the Triumphs
Wu, Q., Siddharth, S., & Sharma, D. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13153697 · Cited by 110
Dai, Y., Chen, S., Pei, X., Almenara, J. A., Kramer, L. B., Venditti, C. A., Dent, P., & Grant, S. (2008) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2008-05-159392 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Sørensen, C. S., Hansen, L. T., Dziegielewski, J., Syljuåsen, R. G., Lundin, C., Bartek, J., & Helleday, T.
- Affiliations
- Danish Cancer Society (DK)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Helleday, Thomas
- Venue
- Nature Cell Biology
- Published
- 2005-01-23
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-201
- ISSN
- 1465-7392 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4679
- OpenAlex
- W2149795092
- Cited by
- 666
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 11.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- Chk1, homologous recombination repair, RAD51, DNA double-strand break repair, DNA damage response, cell cycle checkpoints, hydroxyurea, camptothecin, genome maintenance, replication inhibition
- MeSH terms
- Checkpoint Kinase 1, Animals, Camptothecin, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Cricetinae, Humans, Hydroxyurea, Protein Kinases, Recombination, Genetic, Signal Transduction, Rad51 Recombinase
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review