Cited by 1,278Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 137 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 134 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Rare and common variants: twenty arguments

Open access
Gibson, Greg·2012·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have greatly improved our understanding of the genetic basis of disease risk. The fact that they tend not to identify more than a fraction of the specific causal loci has led to divergence of opinion over whether most of the variance is hidden as numerous rare variants of large effect or as common variants of very small effect. Here I review 20 arguments for and against each of these models of the genetic basis of complex traits and conclude that both classes of effect can be readily reconciled.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg3118

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 134 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 86 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 46
58 of 58
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Genotypic effects are ordered, with heterozygotes having intermediate risk or trait values.

    “For the most part, it is assumed that genotypic effects are ordered, namely that the heterozygotes will have intermediate risk or trait values.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Genotyped SNPs tag the actual causal variant.

    “For the most part, genotyped SNPs are thought to ‘tag’ the actual causal variant”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The heritability of risk is generally estimated as narrow-sense variance.

    “since the heritability of risk is generally estimated as narrow sense variance”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The loci detected by GWAS are the largest effect sizes drawn from a Poisson-like distribution.

    “The loci detected by GWAS are merely the largest effect sizes drawn from a Poisson or similar distribution.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    GWAS has found very few variants with moderate effect.

    “Nevertheless, there remains a general paradox that GWAS has found so few variants of moderate effect.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Disease incidence and complex phenotypes generally cluster in families.

    “However, disease incidence and complex phenotypes generally cluster in families.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 137 references

1 of the 137 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rendel, J. M. Canalization and Gene Control (Academic Press, New York, 1967).
  2. Slatkin, M. Exchangeable models of complex inherited diseases. Genetics 179, 2253–2261 (2008). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 998

Metadata

Authors
Gibson, G.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Gibson, Greg
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2012-01-18
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
135-145
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W1978150238
Cited by
1,278
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 106 · 2015: 124 · 2014: 122 · 2013: 127 · 2012: 57
FWCI
17.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P01GM099568)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
infinitesimal model, rare variants, common genetic variants, complex traits, disease risk, genome-wide association study, heritability, genetic architecture
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Humans, Models, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review