Cited by 215Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatmentNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 7 of the 143 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Parvalbumin interneuron vulnerability and brain disorders

Open access
Ruden, Jacob B., Dugan, Laura L., Konradi, Christine·2021·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Parvalbumin-expressing interneurons (PV-INs) are highly vulnerable to stressors and have been implicated in many neuro-psychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease, autism spectrum disorder, and bipolar disorder. We examined the literature about the current knowledge of the physiological properties of PV-INs and gathered results from diverse research areas to provide insight into their vulnerability to stressors. Among the factors that confer heightened vulnerability are the substantial energy requirements, a strong excitatory drive, and a unique developmental trajectory. Understanding these stressors and elaborating on their impact on PV-IN health is a step toward developing therapies to protect these neurons in various disease states and to retain critical brain functions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41386-020-0778-9

Cites

148 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

75 Not checked yet · 15 Own interpretation · 5 No basis given · 2 Supported · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 136 references — free account

Show all 57 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 34
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 9
41 of 41
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The developmental process by which interneurons migrate and integrate into cortical networks has vulnerabilities.

    “While there likely is some space to correct for minor variabilities, it seems reasonable to assume that the process also has some vulnerabilities.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 148 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 215

Metadata

Authors
Ruden, J. B., Dugan, L. L., & Konradi, C.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Konradi, Christine
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2020-07-28
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
279-287
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W3044343625
Cited by
194
References
148
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 16
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX004321)
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research
  • Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG058856)
  • National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR024977)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
parvalbumin interneurons, neuronal vulnerability, stressors, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease, autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, excitatory drive, energy requirements, interneuron development, neuroprotection
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Interneurons, Neurons, Parvalbumins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review