Cited by 113Cellular transport and secretionAutophagy in Disease and TherapyCalcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 60 of the 72 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Endosomal PI(3)P regulation by the COMMD/CCDC22/CCDC93 (CCC) complex controls membrane protein recycling

Open access

Abstract

Protein recycling through the endolysosomal system relies on molecular assemblies that interact with cargo proteins, membranes, and effector molecules. Among them, the COMMD/CCDC22/CCDC93 (CCC) complex plays a critical role in recycling events. While CCC is closely associated with retriever, a cargo recognition complex, its mechanism of action remains unexplained. Herein we show that CCC and retriever are closely linked through sharing a common subunit (VPS35L), yet the integrity of CCC, but not retriever, is required to maintain normal endosomal levels of phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PI(3)P). CCC complex depletion leads to elevated PI(3)P levels, enhanced recruitment and activation of WASH (an actin nucleation promoting factor), excess endosomal F-actin and trapping of internalized receptors. Mechanistically, we find that CCC regulates the phosphorylation and endosomal recruitment of the PI(3)P phosphatase MTMR2. Taken together, we show that the regulation of PI(3)P levels by the CCC complex is critical to protein recycling in the endosomal compartment.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The CCC complex is a distinct ~700 kDa assembly from retriever (~250 kDa) that shares VPS35L and negatively regulates WASH-dependent endosomal F-actin by controlling PI(3)P turnover via MTMR2. CCC loss elevates endosomal PI(3)P, recruits/activates WASH, traps recycling receptors, and VPS34 inhibition or phosphorylation-resistant MTMR2 S58A rescues these phenotypes.

Key findings

  • CCC and retriever are separable: blue native gel analysis places CCC components COMMD1/CCDC22 near 700 kDa, while VPS35L migrates in both ~700 kDa and ~250 kDa complexes; retriever is ~250 kDa, and VPS35L is a shared subunit. CCC loss collapses the 700 kDa complex, whereas VPS26C loss affects the lower complex.
  • CCC depletion, but not VPS26C or FAM45A depletion, increases endosomal PI(3)P: a dsRed-EEA1-FYVE reporter shows ~2.5-fold higher PI(3)P in COMMD3 and CCDC93 KO cells, and HPLC shows ~3.2-fold higher total PI(3)P in COMMD3 KO cells.
  • CCC loss increases WASH recruitment/activity and endosomal F-actin: WASH, F-actin, cortactin, and ARPC2 accumulate on endosomal compartments; WASH knockdown eliminates excess endosomal F-actin, and Commd1 depletion increases WASH actin-nucleating activity.
  • Mechanistically, CCDC22 binds MTMR2; COMMD1 deficiency elevates phosphorylated MTMR2, MTMR2 knockdown phenocopies CCC loss, and endosomally localized MTMR2 S58A rescues F-actin accumulation in COMMD3 KO cells. VPS34 inhibition or siRNA reduces PI(3)P, WASH, F-actin, and restores integrin recycling defects.

Methods

  • CRISPR/Cas9 knockout HeLa lines for CCDC93, VPS26C, COMMD3, VPS35L, and FAM45A, with lentiviral rescue; HEK293T cells, mouse embryonic fibroblasts, and patient CCDC22 p.T17A fibroblasts; siRNA/shRNA for VPS34, MTMR2, WASH, and COMMD1.
  • Proteomics by HA-CCDC93/HA-VPS26C immunoprecipitation and LC-MS/MS; blue native PAGE; co-immunoprecipitation/immunoblotting; confocal immunofluorescence; pyrene-actin assembly assays; HPLC for phosphoinositides; VPS34 in vitro kinase ELISA; integrin endocytosis/recycling assays.
  • Statistics: mean ± SEM; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test or unpaired two-tailed t test; P < 0.05 considered significant.

Limitations

  • Stated: the precise mechanisms by which endosomal PI(3)P controls WASH recruitment/activation remain to be fully elucidated; how CCC controls MTMR2 phosphorylation and how PI(3)P impacts WASH need future study; the unique contributions of each COMMD protein remain poorly understood.
  • Evident: mechanistic conclusions rely largely on cultured HeLa, HEK293T, mouse embryonic fibroblast, and patient fibroblast systems, with in vivo disease relevance inferred from prior models; the proteomic interactome was n = 1 per group; no direct MTMR2 phosphatase activity assay is shown, only phosphorylation, recruitment, and genetic rescue data.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-12221-6

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Fig. 1 CCC and retriever are closely associated but distinct complexes. a Venn diagram depicting proteins identified by LC/MS-MS as interacting partners of VPS26C or CCDC93 in HeLa cells. All proteins presented were within 10-fold in abundance compared with the bait proteins. CRIPSR/Cas9 was used to make KO lines, which were then stably transduced with an empty vector (EV) or HA-tagged versions of VPS26C or CCDC93. b–d Cell lysates from parental HeLa cells b, VPS26C deleted or rescued cells c, and COMMD3 deleted or rescued cells d were resolved using coomassie blue native (BN) gel electrophoresis. This was followed by membrane transfer and immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies. e Expression of CCC and retriever complex subunits was examined by immunoblotting in the indicated HeLa CRISPR/Cas9 knockout cell lines; quantification after normalization by the loading control (Actin), is also presented as % compared with the parental control (representative of at least three separate iterations)
Fig. 1 CCC and retriever are closely associated but distinct complexes. a Venn diagram depicting proteins identified by LC/MS-MS as interacting partners of VPS26C or CCDC93 in HeLa cells. All proteins presented were within 10-fold in abundance compared with the bait proteins. CRIPSR/Cas9 was used to make KO lines, which were then stably transduced with an empty vector (EV) or HA-tagged versions of VPS26C or CCDC93. b–d Cell lysates from parental HeLa cells b, VPS26C deleted or rescued cells c, and COMMD3 deleted or rescued cells d were resolved using coomassie blue native (BN) gel electrophoresis. This was followed by membrane transfer and immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies. e Expression of CCC and retriever complex subunits was examined by immunoblotting in the indicated HeLa CRISPR/Cas9 knockout cell lines; quantification after normalization by the loading control (Actin), is also presented as % compared with the parental control (representative of at least three separate iterations)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 CCC links retriever to endosomes but its loss affects retriever-independent cargoes. a Confocal images from VPS35L, EEA1, and VPS35 immunofluorescence staining depicting the subcellular localization of the retriever subunit VPS35L in the indicated cell lines. Representative images of two independent experiments are shown. Scale bars, 10 μm, for zoomed images 5 μm. b Immunoprecipitation of the retriever subunit VPS35L was followed by immunoblotting for WASH. Lysates from COMMD3 KO cells and an isogenic rescue line were used (representative of two independent iterations). c Pearson correlation coefficients for GLUT1 and EEA1. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 76 cells for WT, 76 for COMMD3 KO, 38 for CCDC93 KO, 72 for VPS35L KO, 59 for VPS26C KO, and 50 for FAM45A KO); ***P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control). d Confocal microscopy imaging of EEA1 and GLUT1 immunofluorescence staining quantified in c. Representative images from three independent experiments are shown. Scale bars, 10 μm
Fig. 2 CCC links retriever to endosomes but its loss affects retriever-independent cargoes. a Confocal images from VPS35L, EEA1, and VPS35 immunofluorescence staining depicting the subcellular localization of the retriever subunit VPS35L in the indicated cell lines. Representative images of two independent experiments are shown. Scale bars, 10 μm, for zoomed images 5 μm. b Immunoprecipitation of the retriever subunit VPS35L was followed by immunoblotting for WASH. Lysates from COMMD3 KO cells and an isogenic rescue line were used (representative of two independent iterations). c Pearson correlation coefficients for GLUT1 and EEA1. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 76 cells for WT, 76 for COMMD3 KO, 38 for CCDC93 KO, 72 for VPS35L KO, 59 for VPS26C KO, and 50 for FAM45A KO); ***P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control). d Confocal microscopy imaging of EEA1 and GLUT1 immunofluorescence staining quantified in c. Representative images from three independent experiments are shown. Scale bars, 10 μmCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 CCC depletion leads to WASH-dependent increase in endosomal F-actin. a Confocal imaging for F-actin and WASH immunofluorescence staining of HeLa WT and the indicated CRISPR/Cas9 knockout cell lines. Representative images of three independent experiments are shown. Scale bars 20 μm, for zoomed images 10 μm. b Quantification of normalized mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of F-actin on WASH-positive vesicles from a. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 62 cells for WT, 45 for CCDC93 KO, 48 for COMMD3 KO, 50 for VPS35L KO, 43 for VPS26C KO, 48 for FAM45A KO); ***P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control). c Confocal imaging for cortactin and FAM21 immunofluorescence staining in the indicated cell lines. Representative images of two independent experiments are shown. Scale bars 20 μm, for zoomed images 5 μm. d Quantification of cortactin immunofluorescence on FAM21-positive vesicles from c. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 51 for WT cells, 63 for CCDC93 KO, 56 for COMMD3 KO); ***P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control). e Confocal imaging of F-actin, EEA1, and WASH immunofluorescence staining for the indicated cell lines. Representative images of two independent experiments are shown. Scale bars, 10 μm and 5 μm on zoomed images. f Quantitation of endosomal F-actin deposition on EEA1-positive endosomes in the indicated cell lines (n = 35 cells for HeLa WT, 36 for CCDC93 KO shcontrol, 37 for CCDC93 shWASH). The mean MFI and the s.e.m. for each group are plotted; ***P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed t test to CCDC93 KO shcontrol)
Fig. 3 CCC depletion leads to WASH-dependent increase in endosomal F-actin. a Confocal imaging for F-actin and WASH immunofluorescence staining of HeLa WT and the indicated CRISPR/Cas9 knockout cell lines. Representative images of three independent experiments are shown. Scale bars 20 μm, for zoomed images 10 μm. b Quantification of normalized mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of F-actin on WASH-positive vesicles from a. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 62 cells for WT, 45 for CCDC93 KO, 48 for COMMD3 KO, 50 for VPS35L KO, 43 for VPS26C KO, 48 for FAM45A KO); ***P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control). c Confocal imaging for cortactin and FAM21 immunofluorescence staining in the indicated cell lines. Representative images of two independent experiments are shown. Scale bars 20 μm, for zoomed images 5 μm. d Quantification of cortactin immunofluorescence on FAM21-positive vesicles from c. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 51 for WT cells, 63 for CCDC93 KO, 56 for COMMD3 KO); ***P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control). e Confocal imaging of F-actin, EEA1, and WASH immunofluorescence staining for the indicated cell lines. Representative images of two independent experiments are shown. Scale bars, 10 μm and 5 μm on zoomed images. f Quantitation of endosomal F-actin deposition on EEA1-positive endosomes in the indicated cell lines (n = 35 cells for HeLa WT, 36 for CCDC93 KO shcontrol, 37 for CCDC93 shWASH). The mean MFI and the s.e.m. for each group are plotted; ***P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed t test to CCDC93 KO shcontrol)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 WASH endosomal recruitment and activity are increased in CCC-deficient cells. a Normalized mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of WASH was quantified in the indicated cell lines. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 62 cells for HeLa WT, 45 for CCDC93 KO, 48 for COMMD3 KO, 50 for VPS35L KO, 43 for VPS26C KO, 48 for FAM45A KO); ***P < 0.0001; *P < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control). b Confocal imaging of WASH immunofluorescence staining in the indicated cell lines, corresponding to a. Representative images are shown from two independent experiments. Scale bars, 10 μm. c WASH complex activity was determined by pyrene-actin assembly assays in the indicated cell lines (Wash knockout fibroblasts reconstituted with HA-GFP-WASH, that were further transduced with shControl or shCommd1 lentiviruses). WASH recovery and F-actin deposition on protein G beads was determined by fluorescence microscopy (examples shown on the left panels). d Quantification of F-actin fluorescence, normalized to WASH recovery is shown (middle panel), with mean values and s.e.m. plotted (n = 35 cells); ***P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed t test to control). e Immunoblot analysis of the two cell lines is also shown (right panel), including Commd1, WASH (GFP), and actin (as a loading control). Results are representative of three independent iterations. f Quantification of ARPC2 immunofluorescence on VPS35-positive endosomes. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 60 cells for WT, 84 for CCDC93 KO, 77 for COMMD3 KO); ***P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control). g Confocal imaging of ARPC2 and VPS35 immunofluorescence staining in the indicated cell lines, corresponding to f. Representative images of two independent experiments are shown. Scale bars, 10 μm on non-zoomed and 5 μm on zoomed images
Fig. 4 WASH endosomal recruitment and activity are increased in CCC-deficient cells. a Normalized mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of WASH was quantified in the indicated cell lines. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 62 cells for HeLa WT, 45 for CCDC93 KO, 48 for COMMD3 KO, 50 for VPS35L KO, 43 for VPS26C KO, 48 for FAM45A KO); ***P < 0.0001; *P < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control). b Confocal imaging of WASH immunofluorescence staining in the indicated cell lines, corresponding to a. Representative images are shown from two independent experiments. Scale bars, 10 μm. c WASH complex activity was determined by pyrene-actin assembly assays in the indicated cell lines (Wash knockout fibroblasts reconstituted with HA-GFP-WASH, that were further transduced with shControl or shCommd1 lentiviruses). WASH recovery and F-actin deposition on protein G beads was determined by fluorescence microscopy (examples shown on the left panels). d Quantification of F-actin fluorescence, normalized to WASH recovery is shown (middle panel), with mean values and s.e.m. plotted (n = 35 cells); ***P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed t test to control). e Immunoblot analysis of the two cell lines is also shown (right panel), including Commd1, WASH (GFP), and actin (as a loading control). Results are representative of three independent iterations. f Quantification of ARPC2 immunofluorescence on VPS35-positive endosomes. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 60 cells for WT, 84 for CCDC93 KO, 77 for COMMD3 KO); ***P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control). g Confocal imaging of ARPC2 and VPS35 immunofluorescence staining in the indicated cell lines, corresponding to f. Representative images of two independent experiments are shown. Scale bars, 10 μm on non-zoomed and 5 μm on zoomed imagesCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 PI(3)P levels are increased in CCC-deficient cells. a Confocal microscopy imaging from EEA1 and WASH immunofluorescence staining in the indicated cell lines, corresponding to b and c. Representative images of two independent experiments are shown. Scale bars, 10 μm on non-zoomed and 5 μm on zoomed images. For complete staining see Supplementary Fig. 4. b Quantification of the normalized mean fluorescence intensity of EEA1 in the indicated cells lines. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 42 cells for WT, 69 for CCDC93 KO, 86 for COMMD3 KO, 62 for VPS26C KO); ***P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to WT control). c In the same cells used for b, WASH mean fluorescence intensity in the region occupied by EEA1-positive endosomes was quantified; ***P < 0.0001; ns, not significant (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control). d Confocal microscopy imaging from cells transfected with a dsRed-EEA1-FYVE domain PI(3)P reporter plasmid (pseudocolored in green) and co-stained for WASH. Scale bars, 10 μm on non-zoomed and 5 μm on zoomed images. e Quantification of the normalized mean fluorescence intensity of the PI(3)P reporter (FYVE). Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 35 cells for WT, 43 for COMMD3 KO, 40 for CCDC93 KO, 36 for VPS26C KO); ***P < 0.0001; ns, not significant (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control). f PI(3)P levels determined by HPLC in HeLa WT and COMMD3 KO cells. Mean and s.e.m. of four biological replicates per group are plotted. Representative data of two independent experiments are shown; ***P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed t test to control)
Fig. 5 PI(3)P levels are increased in CCC-deficient cells. a Confocal microscopy imaging from EEA1 and WASH immunofluorescence staining in the indicated cell lines, corresponding to b and c. Representative images of two independent experiments are shown. Scale bars, 10 μm on non-zoomed and 5 μm on zoomed images. For complete staining see Supplementary Fig. 4. b Quantification of the normalized mean fluorescence intensity of EEA1 in the indicated cells lines. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 42 cells for WT, 69 for CCDC93 KO, 86 for COMMD3 KO, 62 for VPS26C KO); ***P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to WT control). c In the same cells used for b, WASH mean fluorescence intensity in the region occupied by EEA1-positive endosomes was quantified; ***P < 0.0001; ns, not significant (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control). d Confocal microscopy imaging from cells transfected with a dsRed-EEA1-FYVE domain PI(3)P reporter plasmid (pseudocolored in green) and co-stained for WASH. Scale bars, 10 μm on non-zoomed and 5 μm on zoomed images. e Quantification of the normalized mean fluorescence intensity of the PI(3)P reporter (FYVE). Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 35 cells for WT, 43 for COMMD3 KO, 40 for CCDC93 KO, 36 for VPS26C KO); ***P < 0.0001; ns, not significant (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control). f PI(3)P levels determined by HPLC in HeLa WT and COMMD3 KO cells. Mean and s.e.m. of four biological replicates per group are plotted. Representative data of two independent experiments are shown; ***P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed t test to control)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 VPS34 inhibition restores trafficking in CCC-deficient cells. a Confocal images of cells transfected with a PI(3)P reporter (FYVE) and co-stained for FAM21 (left panels). Cells were treated with vehicle (DMSO) or a VPS34 kinase inhibitor (VPS34-IN1). Scale bars, 10 μm. b Normalized FYVE fluorescence intensity was quantified. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (number of cells: WT = 94, WT VPS34-IN1 = 58, COMMD3 KO = 92, COMMD3 KO VPS34-IN1 = 77, CCDC93 KO = 99, CCDC93 KO VPS34-IN1 = 81); ***P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed t test). c HeLa WT and two CCC KO cells (COMMD3 and CCDC93 KO) were treated with the VPS34 inhibitor or vehicle control. Quantification of normalized EEA1 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) per cell (left panel), as well as WASH and phalloidin MFI on EEA1-positive areas (middle and right panels) are shown. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (number of cells: WT = 26, WT VPS34-IN1 = 34, COMMD3 KO = 12, COMMD3 KO VPS34-IN1 = 32, CCDC93 KO = 40, CCDC93 KO VPS34-IN1 = 50); ***P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed t test against DMSO negative control). d Confocal microscopy imaging of ITGα5 and WASH immunofluorescence staining after an ITGα5 recycling experiment. VPS34 silencing (siVPS34) in the indicated cell lines is shown. Representative of 2 independent experiments. Scale bars, 10 μm. e, f Cells were transfected with control or three independent VPS34 siRNAs and normalized mean fluorescence intensity of WASH per cell d or ITGα5 on WASH-positive endosomes e was quantified. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (number of cells: HeLa control siRNA (csiRNA) = 130, HeLa siVPS34 1 = 113, HeLa siVPS34 2 = 82, HeLa siVPS34 3 = 142, COMMD3 KO csiRNA = 90, COMMD3 KO siVPS34 1 = 120, COMMD3 KO siVPS34 2 = 85, COMMD3 KO siVPS34 3 = 130); ***P < 0.0001; **P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control siRNA)
Fig. 6 VPS34 inhibition restores trafficking in CCC-deficient cells. a Confocal images of cells transfected with a PI(3)P reporter (FYVE) and co-stained for FAM21 (left panels). Cells were treated with vehicle (DMSO) or a VPS34 kinase inhibitor (VPS34-IN1). Scale bars, 10 μm. b Normalized FYVE fluorescence intensity was quantified. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (number of cells: WT = 94, WT VPS34-IN1 = 58, COMMD3 KO = 92, COMMD3 KO VPS34-IN1 = 77, CCDC93 KO = 99, CCDC93 KO VPS34-IN1 = 81); ***P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed t test). c HeLa WT and two CCC KO cells (COMMD3 and CCDC93 KO) were treated with the VPS34 inhibitor or vehicle control. Quantification of normalized EEA1 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) per cell (left panel), as well as WASH and phalloidin MFI on EEA1-positive areas (middle and right panels) are shown. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (number of cells: WT = 26, WT VPS34-IN1 = 34, COMMD3 KO = 12, COMMD3 KO VPS34-IN1 = 32, CCDC93 KO = 40, CCDC93 KO VPS34-IN1 = 50); ***P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed t test against DMSO negative control). d Confocal microscopy imaging of ITGα5 and WASH immunofluorescence staining after an ITGα5 recycling experiment. VPS34 silencing (siVPS34) in the indicated cell lines is shown. Representative of 2 independent experiments. Scale bars, 10 μm. e, f Cells were transfected with control or three independent VPS34 siRNAs and normalized mean fluorescence intensity of WASH per cell d or ITGα5 on WASH-positive endosomes e was quantified. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (number of cells: HeLa control siRNA (csiRNA) = 130, HeLa siVPS34 1 = 113, HeLa siVPS34 2 = 82, HeLa siVPS34 3 = 142, COMMD3 KO csiRNA = 90, COMMD3 KO siVPS34 1 = 120, COMMD3 KO siVPS34 2 = 85, COMMD3 KO siVPS34 3 = 130); ***P < 0.0001; **P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test to control siRNA)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 CCC complex regulates MTMR2 phosphorylation. a Immunoprecipitation of CCDC22 from HEK293T cells transfected with pEBB-2xHA-MTMR2. Precipitates were immunoblotted for MTMR2 (HA) and CCDC22. Representative of three independent iterations. b Immunoprecipitation of endogenous CCDC22 from HEK293T cell lysates followed by immunoblotting for CCDC22 and MTMR2. Representative of three different iterations. c The indicated HA-tagged CCDC22 constructs were transfected in HEK293T cells followed by immunoprecipitation with HA antibody. The recovered material was immunoblotted for endogenous MTMR2 and COMMD1, as well as CCDC22 (HA). Representative of two different iterations. d Confocal imaging of F-actin (phalloidin) and FAM21 immunofluorescence staining in HeLa cells transfected with two independent MTMR2 siRNAs or a control oligonucleotide. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bars, 10 μm, 5 μm on zoomed images. e Confocal microscopy imaging of ITGβ1 and WASH immunofluorescence staining after an ITGβ1 recycling experiment. Cells were transfected with control or MTMR2 targeting siRNA and treated with VPS34 kinase inhibitor (VPS34-IN1) or vehicle control (DMSO) as indicated. Representative of two independent experiments. Scale bars, 10 μm. f Immunoprecipitation of endogenous MTMR2 from cell lysates obtained from HEK293T shControl and shCOMMD1, followed by immunoblotting for phosphoserine, MTMR2 and COMMD1. The experiment is representative of three independent iterations. g Confocal imaging for MTMR2 (HA), FAM21, and phalloidin immunofluorescence staining from HeLa WT and COMMD3 KO cells transiently transfected with pEBB-2xHA-MTMR2 and pEBB-2xHA-MTMR2 S58A. Representative images from two separate iterations are shown. Scale bar, 10 μm. h Quantification of normalized mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of F-actin on FAM21-positive vesicles in COMMD3 KO. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 69 for COMMD3 KO 2HA-MTMR2 WT, n = 40 for 2xHA-MTMR2 S58A); ***P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed t test). i Model depicting how the CCC complex regulates retriever recruitment as well as WASH-dependent actin nucleation on endosomes by regulating PI(3)P levels through MTMR2 phosphorylation/recruitment. Please refer to the Discussion section for additional details
Fig. 7 CCC complex regulates MTMR2 phosphorylation. a Immunoprecipitation of CCDC22 from HEK293T cells transfected with pEBB-2xHA-MTMR2. Precipitates were immunoblotted for MTMR2 (HA) and CCDC22. Representative of three independent iterations. b Immunoprecipitation of endogenous CCDC22 from HEK293T cell lysates followed by immunoblotting for CCDC22 and MTMR2. Representative of three different iterations. c The indicated HA-tagged CCDC22 constructs were transfected in HEK293T cells followed by immunoprecipitation with HA antibody. The recovered material was immunoblotted for endogenous MTMR2 and COMMD1, as well as CCDC22 (HA). Representative of two different iterations. d Confocal imaging of F-actin (phalloidin) and FAM21 immunofluorescence staining in HeLa cells transfected with two independent MTMR2 siRNAs or a control oligonucleotide. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bars, 10 μm, 5 μm on zoomed images. e Confocal microscopy imaging of ITGβ1 and WASH immunofluorescence staining after an ITGβ1 recycling experiment. Cells were transfected with control or MTMR2 targeting siRNA and treated with VPS34 kinase inhibitor (VPS34-IN1) or vehicle control (DMSO) as indicated. Representative of two independent experiments. Scale bars, 10 μm. f Immunoprecipitation of endogenous MTMR2 from cell lysates obtained from HEK293T shControl and shCOMMD1, followed by immunoblotting for phosphoserine, MTMR2 and COMMD1. The experiment is representative of three independent iterations. g Confocal imaging for MTMR2 (HA), FAM21, and phalloidin immunofluorescence staining from HeLa WT and COMMD3 KO cells transiently transfected with pEBB-2xHA-MTMR2 and pEBB-2xHA-MTMR2 S58A. Representative images from two separate iterations are shown. Scale bar, 10 μm. h Quantification of normalized mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of F-actin on FAM21-positive vesicles in COMMD3 KO. Results for individual cells are plotted, along with the mean and s.e.m. for each group (n = 69 for COMMD3 KO 2HA-MTMR2 WT, n = 40 for 2xHA-MTMR2 S58A); ***P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed t test). i Model depicting how the CCC complex regulates retriever recruitment as well as WASH-dependent actin nucleation on endosomes by regulating PI(3)P levels through MTMR2 phosphorylation/recruitment. Please refer to the Discussion section for additional detailsCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

67 Own result · 35 Own interpretation · 17 Partly supported · 14 Own method · 5 No basis given · 4 No full text of the sources · 3 Supported · 2 Couldn’t confirm · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 76 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 29
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 47
71 of 71
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    PI(3)P plays a central role in endosomal recruitment of effector proteins such as EEA1.

    “As PI(3)P plays a central role in endosomal recruitment of effector proteins, such as early endosomal antigen 1 (EEA1), we assessed the levels of endosomally localized EEA1”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The phosphoserine antibody used recognizes phosphorylated MTMR2 at serine 58.

    “This residue is preceded by phenylalanine and upon phosphorylation may be recognized by a phosphoserine antibody raised against this motif (phosphoserine preceded by tyrosine, phenylalanine, or tryptophan).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The dsRed-EEA1-FYVE reporter specifically reports endosomal PI(3)P levels.

    “cells transfected with a dsRed-EEA1-FYVE domain PI(3)P reporter plasmid”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–113 of 113

Metadata

Authors
Singla, A., Fedoseienko, A., Giridharan, S. S. P., Overlee, B. L., Lopez, A., Jia, D., Song, J., Huff-Hardy, K., Weisman, L., Burstein, E., & Billadeau, D. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Sichuan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Burstein, Ezra
  • Billadeau, Daniel D.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-09-19
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
4271-4271
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2974473258
Cited by
113
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R01DK073639, RO1DK107733, R01NS064015, R01NS099340, K01DK106346)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
Keywords
protein recycling, endolysosomal system, WASH complex, MTMR2, cargo recognition, membrane protein recycling
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, HeLa Cells, Humans, Lysosomes, Membrane Proteins, Microfilament Proteins, Phosphorylation, Proteins, Endosomes, Phosphatidylinositol Phosphates, Vesicular Transport Proteins, RNA Interference, RNA, Small Interfering, Cell Line, Tumor, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Mice, Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases, Non-Receptor, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review