Cited by 408Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 306 of the 309 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 174 of the 241 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

SenNet recommendations for detecting senescent cells in different tissues

Open access

Abstract

Once considered a tissue culture-specific phenomenon, cellular senescence has now been linked to various biological processes with both beneficial and detrimental roles in humans, rodents and other species. Much of our understanding of senescent cell biology still originates from tissue culture studies, where each cell in the culture is driven to an irreversible cell cycle arrest. By contrast, in tissues, these cells are relatively rare and difficult to characterize, and it is now established that fully differentiated, postmitotic cells can also acquire a senescence phenotype. The SenNet Biomarkers Working Group was formed to provide recommendations for the use of cellular senescence markers to identify and characterize senescent cells in tissues. Here, we provide recommendations for detecting senescent cells in different tissues based on a comprehensive analysis of existing literature reporting senescence markers in 14 tissues in mice and humans. We discuss some of the recent advances in detecting and characterizing cellular senescence, including molecular senescence signatures and morphological features, and the use of circulating markers. We aim for this work to be a valuable resource for both seasoned investigators in senescence-related studies and newcomers to the field.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41580-024-00738-8

Cites

306 of 306 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

174 of 241 cited sources checked · 62 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 93 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 22
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 61
78 of 78
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The set of 224 papers and 328 markers in their database is sufficiently comprehensive and representative to support tissue-specific marker recommendations.

    “The database contains information from 224 peer-reviewed papers and 328 markers, covering a total of 14 mouse and human tissues, along with circulating markers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The presence of multiple senescence hallmarks in the same cell is sufficient to identify a senescent cell.

    “Our recommendation is to require the presence of multiple hallmarks of senescence in the same cell, as described in Box 2.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Marker expression observed in animal models can be extrapolated to human tissues.

    “in 14 tissues in mice and humans”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The senescence markers reported in the cited studies are valid indicators of cellular senescence in the tissues discussed.

    “Based on information from published human and mouse studies, we have outlined the current knowledge about senescence markers that are specific to various tissues.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings about senescence markers in mouse tissues can inform the identification of senescent cells in the corresponding human tissues.

    “Senescence is observed in several human and mouse kidney cell types during healthy ageing and nephropathy.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Low-grade lesions are described as preceding the neoplasm they belong to

    Minor

    The study's low-grade dysplasia cases are presented as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. The next sentence describes a decline in the same markers during the transition to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, even though those lesions are already cases of it.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Items 201–306 of 306

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 309 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
Suryadevara, V., Hudgins, A. D., Rajesh, A., Pappalardo, A., Karpova, A., Dey, A. K., Hertzel, A., Agudelo, A., Rocha, A., Soygur, B., Schilling, B., Carver, C. M., Aguayo-Mazzucato, C., Baker, D. J., Bernlohr, D. A., Jurk, D., Mangarova, D. B., Quardokus, E. M., Enninga, E. A. L., Schmidt, E. L., Chen, F., Duncan, F. E., Cambuli, F., Kaur, G., Kuchel, G. A., Lee, G., Daldrup-Link, H. E., Martini, H., Phatnani, H., Al-Naggar, I. M., Rahman, I., Nie, J., Passos, J. F., Silverstein, J. C., Campisi, J., Wang, J., Iwasaki, K., Barbosa, K., Metis, K., Nernekli, K., Niedernhofer, L. J., Ding, L., Wang, L., Adams, L. C., Ruiyang, L., Doolittle, M. L., Teneche, M. G., Schafer, M. J., Xu, M., Hajipour, M., Boroumand, M., Basisty, N., Sloan, N., Slavov, N., Kuksenko, O., Robson, P., Gomez, P. T., Vasilikos, P., Adams, P. D., Carapeto, P., Zhu, Q., Ramasamy, R., Perez-Lorenzo, R., Fan, R., Dong, R., Montgomery, R. R., Shaikh, S., Vickovic, S., Yin, S., Kang, S., Suvakov, S., Khosla, S., Garovic, V. D., Menon, V., Xu, Y., Song, Y., Suh, Y., Dou, Z., & Neretti, N.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Buck Institute for Research on Aging (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • New York Genome Center (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • UConn Health (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Neretti, Nicola
Venue
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Published
2024-06-03
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
1001-1023
ISSN
  • 1471-0072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0080
OpenAlex
W4399285708
Cited by
408
References
309
Citations by year
2026: 184 · 2025: 186 · 2024: 37
FWCI
23.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5ug3ca275686-02, AG062413)
  • National Institute on Aging (F31AG072748, R01AG069819, R01AG068182, U01AG060906, R01AG050582, R01AG068048, P01AG017242, R33AG061456, T32AG041688, U54AG075934, R01AG076642, U54AG075941, U54AG075932, R01AG082708, U54AG079779, P30AG067988, U54AG079754, U54AG076041, P01AG062413, U54AG076040, R01AG076515, U54AG079758, U54AG079753, U54AG079759, U54AG075931)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL147575, R01HL147290)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH126036)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (RM1HG011014)
  • National Cancer Institute (UG3CA268105, UG3CA268202, UG3CA268112, UH3CA268103, UG3CA268117, UG3CA275669, UG3CA268103, UG3CA268096, P30CA015083, UH3CA275686, U24CA268108, UG3 CA275686)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM136566)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI089992)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK127778, P30DK036836, R01DK132535)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES001247)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
cellular senescence, senescence markers, postmitotic cells, cancer, aging
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Organ Specificity, Biomarkers, Cellular Senescence, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review