Cited by 243Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Deconstructing cortical folding: genetic, cellular and mechanical determinants

Llinares-Benadero, Cristina, Borrell, Víctor·2019·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

Folding of the cerebral cortex is a fundamental milestone of mammalian brain evolution and is associated with dramatic increases in size and complexity. New animal models, genetic tools and bioengineering materials have moved the study of cortical folding from simple phenomenological observation to sophisticated experimental testing. Here, we provide an overview of how genetics, cell biology and biomechanics shape this complex and multifaceted process and affect each other. We discuss the evolution of cortical folding and the genomic changes in the primate lineage that seem to be responsible for the advent of larger brains and cortical folding. Emerging technologies now provide unprecedented tools to analyse and manipulate cortical folding, with the promise of elucidating the mechanisms underlying the stereotyped folding of the cerebral cortex in its full complexity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41583-018-0112-2

Cites

213 of 213 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modifications of developmental events during primate evolution produce quantitative and qualitative changes in cellular structure and synaptic circuitry.

    “Although the basic principles of cortical development may be similar in all mammals, the modifications of developmental events during millennia of primate evolution produce not only quantitative but also qualitative changes of its cellular structure and synaptic circuitry [13, 20].”

    From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 216 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bok, S. T. Histonomy of the Cerebral Cortex (Elsevier, 1959).
  2. Bahi-Buisson, N. & Cavallin, M. Tubulinopathies overview. GeneReviews https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK350554 (updated 24 Mar 2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Llinares-Benadero, C., & Borrell, V.
Affiliations
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2019-01-04
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
161-176
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2907389933
Cited by
243
References
216
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 11
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
cortical folding, cerebral cortex, brain evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Movement, Cerebral Cortex, Biological Evolution, Humans, Neuroglia, Neurons, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review