Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,082

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 157 of the 157 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanoparticle colloidal stability in cell culture media and impact on cellular interactions

Open access
Moore, Thomas L., Rodriguez-Lorenzo, Laura, Hirsch, Vera, Balog, Sandor, Urban, Dominic, Jud, Corinne, Rothen-Rutishauser, Barbara, Lattuada, Marco, Petri-Fink, Alke·2015·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

This review discusses nanoparticle colloidal stability in biological media in an attempt to shed light on the difficulty correlating nanoparticle physico-chemical properties and biological fate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c4cs00487f

Cites

157 of 157 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,082

Metadata

Authors
Moore, T. L., Rodriguez-Lorenzo, L., Hirsch, V., Balog, S., Urban, D., Jud, C., Rothen-Rutishauser, B., Lattuada, M., & Petri-Fink, A.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2015
Volume
44
Issue
17
Pages
6287-6305
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W1949636578
Cited by
1,082
References
157
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.