The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design Theory for Dynamic Complexity in Information Infrastructures: The Case of Building Internet
Abstract
We propose a design theory that tackles dynamic complexity in the design for Information Infrastructures (IIs) defined as a shared, open, heterogeneous and evolving socio-technical system of Information Technology (IT) capabilities. Examples of IIs include the Internet, or industry-wide Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) networks. IIs are recursively composed of other infrastructures, platforms, applications and IT capabilities and controlled by emergent, distributed and episodic forms of control. II's evolutionary dynamics are nonlinear, path dependent and influenced by network effects and unbounded user and designer learning. The proposed theory tackles tensions between two design problems related to the II design: (1) the bootstrap problem: IIs need to meet directly early users’ needs in order to be initiated; and (2) the adaptability problem: local designs need to recognize II's unbounded scale and functional uncertainty. We draw upon Complex Adaptive Systems theory to derive II design rules that address the bootstrap problem by generating early growth through simplicity and usefulness, and the adaptability problem by promoting modular and generative designs. We illustrate these principles by analyzing the history of Internet exegesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001 · Cited by 6,188
The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1
Gregor, S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148742 · Cited by 3,306 · cited 2×
“Design theories are about ‘how to’ principles and rules of form and function, and justificatory ‘because of’ explanatory knowledge that can be mobilized during the design (Gregor, 2006).”
BackgroundSteps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces
Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.7.1.111 · Cited by 3,238
Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing
Attewell, P. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.1 · Cited by 1,401
Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology
Siegen, U., Pipek, V., Wulf, V., & Siegen, F.-I. F. A. I. F. A. U. (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00195 · Cited by 638
Cited by
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0322 · Cited by 2,964
Self-citationThe Digital Platform: A Research Agenda
de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3 · Cited by 1,681
Research Commentary —Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda
Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0318 · Cited by 1,366
Self-citationIntroduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age
Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, G. G. (2018) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2018.0794 · Cited by 943
Digital Product Innovation Within Four Classes of Innovation Networks
Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & Boland Jr., R. J. (2016) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12093 · Cited by 806
Self-citationThe Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts1
Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.02 · Cited by 780
The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda
Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004 · Cited by 725
Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple’s iOS Service System1
Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sørensen, C., & Yoo, Y. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.1.10 · Cited by 583
Bygstad, B., Øvrelid, E., Ludvigsen, S., & Dæhlen, M. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463 · Cited by 582
Complexity Theory: An Overview with Potential Applications for the Social Sciences
Turner, J. R., & Baker, R. M. (2019) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems7010004 · Cited by 372
From Artefacts to Infrastructures
Monteiro, E., Pollock, N., Hanseth, O., & Williams, R. (2013) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-012-9167-1 · Cited by 258
Self-citationBygstad, B., Munkvold, B. E., & Volkoff, O. (2016) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2015.13 · Cited by 257
For You, or For"You"?: Everyday LGBTQ+ Encounters with TikTok
Simpson, E., & Semaan, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3432951 · Cited by 230
Ziolkowski, R., Miscione, G., & Schwabe, G. (2020) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2020.1759974 · Cited by 151
Digitalization, institutions and new venture internationalization
Brieger, S. A., Chowdhury, F., Hechavarría, D. M., Muralidharan, E., Pathak, S., & Lam, Y. T. (2022) · Journal of International Management · doi:10.1016/j.intman.2022.100949 · Cited by 69
Semaan, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359175 · Cited by 58
Simpson, E., Dalal, S., & Semaan, B. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579490 · Cited by 54
Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2018) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2018.15913abstract · Cited by 28
The clinic-level perspective on mHealth implementation: a South African case study
Wolff-Piggott, B., Coleman, J., & Rivett, U. (2018) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2016.1233858 · Cited by 21
How Do Researchers (Re-)Use Design Principles: An Inductive Analysis of Cumulative Research
Schoormann, T., Möller, F., & Hansen, M. R. P. (2021) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_20 · Cited by 9
Gnewuch, U., & Reinkemeier, F. (2026) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2025/18742 · Cited by 5
Ciriello, R., Mindel, V., & Mathiassen, L. (2024) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2024.607 · Cited by 2
Butt, S. A., Pappel, I., Draheim, D., & Palu, R. (2026) · Records Management Journal · doi:10.1108/rmj-01-2026-0002
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Information Technology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0268-3962 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4437
- OpenAlex
- W2136434542
- Cited by
- 748
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 129.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
