Cited by 1,203Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsMitochondrial Function and PathologyNuclear Receptors and Signaling

Mitochondrial pathology and apoptotic muscle degeneration in Drosophila parkin mutants

Open access
Greene, Jessica C., Whitworth, Alexander J., Kuo, Isabella, Andrews, Laurie A., Feany, Mel B., Pallanck, Leo J.·2003·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder characterized by loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Several lines of evidence strongly implicate mitochondrial dysfunction as a major causative factor in PD, although the molecular mechanisms responsible for mitochondrial dysfunction are poorly understood. Recently, loss-of-function mutations in the parkin gene, which encodes a ubiquitin-protein ligase, were found to underlie a familial form of PD known as autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism (AR-JP). To gain insight into the molecular mechanism responsible for selective cell death in AR-JP, we have created a Drosophila model of this disorder. Drosophila parkin null mutants exhibit reduced lifespan, locomotor defects, and male sterility. The locomotor defects derive from apoptotic cell death of muscle subsets, whereas the male sterile phenotype derives from a spermatid individualization defect at a late stage of spermatogenesis. Mitochondrial pathology is the earliest manifestation of muscle degeneration and a prominent characteristic of individualizing spermatids in parkin mutants. These results indicate that the tissue-specific phenotypes observed in Drosophila parkin mutants result from mitochondrial dysfunction and raise the possibility that similar mitochondrial impairment triggers the selective cell loss observed in AR-JP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0737556100

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduction of mitophagy caused by ablation of PINK and Parkin induces mitochondrial dysfunction and increased sensitivity to oxidative stress followed by muscle degeneration.

    “Conversely, reduction of mitophagy caused by the ablation of PINK and Parkin induces mitochondrial dysfunction and increased sensitivity to oxidative stress followed by muscle degeneration [225–228].”
  • Both excessive autophagy and deficient degradation of cytosolic components contribute to muscle atrophy.

    “Both excessive autophagy [140, 186] and the deficient degradation of cytosolic components [225, 226] contribute to muscle atrophy.”
  • Parkin loss-of-function in Drosophila resulted in decreased lifespan and increased locomotor defects.

    “whereas Parkin loss-of-function in Drosophila resulted in a decreased lifespan and increased locomotor defects [157,158].”
  • In Drosophila, knocking out either Parkin or Pink1 caused muscle degeneration that was associated with enlarged mitochondria.

    “Although there are conflicting data regarding the specific effects of these proteins on mitochondrial morphology in mammalian cells, extensive studies in Drosophila revealed that knocking out either gene caused muscle degeneration that was associated with enlarged mitochondria (Clark et al., 2006; Greene et al., 2003).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greene, J. C., Whitworth, A. J., Kuo, I., Andrews, L. A., Feany, M. B., & Pallanck, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, P.O. Box 357730, Seattle, WA 98195; and Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-03-17
Volume
100
Issue
7
Pages
4078-4083
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2055124287
Cited by
1,203
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 67
FWCI
27.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS041780, 1R01NS41780-01, 1R01NS41536-01, R01NS041536)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
Keywords
Parkin, Parkinson's disease, autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism, mitochondrial dysfunction, muscle degeneration, apoptosis, Drosophila model, ubiquitin-protein ligase, spermatid individualization, male sterility, locomotion defects, lifespan, selective cell death
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Cloning, Molecular, Drosophila, Ligases, Longevity, Male, Mitochondria, Molecular Sequence Data, Nerve Degeneration, Parkinson Disease, Recombinant Proteins, Spermatids, Mutagenesis, Sequence Alignment, Apoptosis, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Muscle, Skeletal, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review