The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy: , by Cathy O'Neil. New York, NY: Crown Publishers, 2016. 272 pp. $26.00 hardcover. ISBN 9780553418811 (hardcover).
Abstract
"Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy." The Information Society, 33(5), pp. 301–302
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
k-ANONYMITY: A MODEL FOR PROTECTING PRIVACY
SWEENEY, L. (2002) · International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1142/s0218488502001648 · Cited by 8,571
Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life
Nissenbaum, H. (2009) · doi:10.1515/9780804772891 · Cited by 2,129
Privacy and human behavior in the age of information
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1465 · Cited by 1,879
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Angwin J., 2014, Dragnet nation: A quest for privacy, security, and freedom in a world of relentless surveillance
- 10.1017/CBO9781107590205.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262029735.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1229517 · DOI · Paper page
- Mayer-Schönberger V., 2013, Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think
- 10.1145/270858.270866 · DOI · Paper page
- Nissenbaum H., 1998, Law and Philosophy, 17, 559, 10.1023/A:1006184504201 · DOI
- Ohm P., 2010, UCLA Law Review, 57, 1701
- Rule J., 2007, Privacy in peril
- Schneier B., 2015, Data and Goliath: The hidden battles to capture your data and control your world
Cited by
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0072 · Cited by 2,755
Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy
Shneiderman, B. (2020) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118 · Cited by 1,743
Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019) · Television & New Media · doi:10.1177/1527476418796632 · Cited by 1,617
Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data
Gianfrancesco, M. A., Tamang, S., Yazdany, J., & Schmajuk, G. (2018) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3763 · Cited by 1,395
A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846 · Cited by 1,384
Consumers and artificial intelligence: An experiential perspective
Puntoni, S., Reczek, R. W., Giesler, M., & Botti, S. (2021) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242920953847 · Cited by 1,547
Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence systems—An introductory survey
Ntoutsi, E., Fafalios, P., Gadiraju, U., Iosifidis, V., Nejdl, W., Vidal, M., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Papadopoulos, S., Krasanakis, E., et al. (2020) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1356 · Cited by 1,043
Machine Learning Approaches for Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry
Dwyer, D. B., Falkai, P., & Koutsouleris, N. (2018) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045037 · Cited by 966
Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm
Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005 · Cited by 929
Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899 · Cited by 927
Lambrecht, A., & Tucker, C. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3093 · Cited by 854
A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making
Burton, J. W., Stein, M., & Jensen, T. B. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2155 · Cited by 814
What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally
Taylor, L. (2017) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717736335 · Cited by 802
Algorithmic bias: review, synthesis, and future research directions
Kordzadeh, N., & Ghasemaghaei, M. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2021.1927212 · Cited by 770
Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Coeckelbergh, M., López de Prado, M., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101896 · Cited by 800
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kiciman, E. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2886526 · Cited by 763
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kıcıman, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00013 · Cited by 763
Ethical Implications and Accountability of Algorithms
Martin, K. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3921-3 · Cited by 757
Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges
Cath, C. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0080 · Cited by 745
Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions
Mitchell, S., Potash, E., Barocas, S., D'Amour, A., & Lum, K. (2021) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-042720-125902 · Cited by 687
'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions
Binns, R., Van Kleek, M., Veale, M., Lyngs, U., Zhao, J., & Shadbolt, N. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173951 · Cited by 691
“3 After consulting relevant literature on how ML systems are being applied in each context (e.g. [43, 38, 43, 55, 72]), we settled on the following contexts: 1.”
BackgroundChallenges in deploying machine learning: A survey of case studies
Paleyes, A., Urma, R.-G., & Lawrence, N. D. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3533378 · Cited by 638
Accountable Artificial Intelligence: Holding Algorithms to Account
Busuioc, M. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13293 · Cited by 652
“…the potential of big data has led public bodies to adopt algorithmic systems in the provision of public services (Eubanks 2018; Ferguson 2017; O’Neil 2016), with fundamental implications for public administration: The impact of digital technologies on the public sector has been well…”
BackgroundPredictably Unequal? The Effects of Machine Learning on Credit Markets
FUSTER, A., GOLDSMITH‐PINKHAM, P., RAMADORAI, T., & WALTHER, A. (2022) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13090 · Cited by 872
Towards a standard for identifying and managing bias in artificial intelligence
Schwartz, R., Vassilev, A., Greene, K., Perine, L., Burt, A., & Hall, P. (2022) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.1270 · Cited by 548
Where fairness fails: data, algorithms, and the limits of antidiscrimination discourse
Hoffmann, A. L. (2019) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1573912 · Cited by 535
Digital platforms for development: Foundations and research agenda
Bonina, C., Koskinen, K., Eaton, B., & Gawer, A. (2021) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12326 · Cited by 512
Artificial Intelligence in Society
OECD (2019) · doi:10.1787/eedfee77-en · Cited by 487
FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithm
Zehlike, M., Bonchi, F., Castillo, C., Hajian, S., Megahed, M., & Baeza-Yates, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3132847.3132938 · Cited by 496
Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification
Ustun, B., Spangher, A., & Liu, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287566 · Cited by 501
Alon-Barkat, S., & Busuioc, M. (2023) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muac007 · Cited by 469
Lateral Exchange Markets: How Social Platforms Operate in a Networked Economy
Perren, R., & Kozinets, R. V. (2018) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.14.0250 · Cited by 396
To be or not to be algorithm aware: a question of a new digital divide?
Gran, A.-B., Booth, P., & Bucher, T. (2021) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1736124 · Cited by 410
Ethics and Privacy in AI and Big Data: Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation
Stahl, B. C., & Wright, D. (2018) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2701164 · Cited by 374
Frenemies: How Social Media Polarizes America
Settle, J. E. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108560573 · Cited by 377
SHIFTing artificial intelligence to be responsible in healthcare: a systematic review
Siala, H., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114782 · Cited by 358
The Challenges of Algorithm-Based HR Decision-Making for Personal Integrity
Leicht-Deobald, U., Busch, T., Schank, C., Weibel, A., Schafheitle, S., Wildhaber, I., & Kasper, G. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04204-w · Cited by 347
Breaking the vicious cycle of algorithmic management: A virtue ethics approach to people analytics
Gal, U., Jensen, T. B., & Stein, M.-K. (2020) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2020.100301 · Cited by 342
Thorsen-Meyer, H.-C., Nielsen, A. B., Nielsen, A. P., Kaas-Hansen, B. S., Toft, P., Schierbeck, J., Strøm, T., Chmura, P. J., Heimann, M., Dybdahl, L., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30018-2 · Cited by 336
Bias and Discrimination in AI: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective
Ferrer, X., Nuenen, T. V., Such, J. M., Cote, M., & Criado, N. (2021) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2021.3056293 · Cited by 308
“Digital discrimination is prevalent in a diverse range of fields, such as in risk assessment systems for policing and credit scores [1], [2].”
BackgroundPredictably Unequal? The Effects of Machine Learning on Credit Markets
Fuster, A., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P. S., Ramadorai, T., & Walther, A. (2017) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3072038 · Cited by 769
50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning
Hutchinson, B., & Mitchell, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287600 · Cited by 297
Trusting Automation: Designing for Responsivity and Resilience
Chiou, E. K., & Lee, J. D. (2023) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208211009995 · Cited by 301
Stewardship of global collective behavior
Bak-Coleman, J. B., Alfano, M., Barfuss, W., Bergstrom, C. T., Centeno, M. A., Couzin, I. D., Donges, J. F., Galesic, M., Gersick, A. S., Jacquet, J., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2025764118 · Cited by 289
Ahmad, K., Maabreh, M., Ghaly, M., Khan, K., Qadir, J., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2022) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100452 · Cited by 291
Belenguer, L. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00138-8 · Cited by 289
“Whilst useful in creating debate, these tend to present either no solutions at all or overly simplified single solutions [13, 15, 19, 29, 32, 35, 56, 60, 64, 89, 96, 104].”
BackgroundLindebaum, D., Vesa, M., & den Hond, F. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0181 · Cited by 290
Urban artificial intelligence: from automation to autonomy in the smart city
Cugurullo, F. (2020) · Frontiers in Sustainable Cities · doi:10.3389/frsc.2020.00038 · Cited by 290
Chou, Y.-L., Moreira, C., Bruza, P., Ouyang, C., & Jorge, J. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.11.003 · Cited by 302
Technologies of Crime Prediction: The Reception of Algorithms in Policing and Criminal Courts
Brayne, S., & Christin, A. (2021) · Social Problems · doi:10.1093/socpro/spaa004 · Cited by 279
Chin, M. H., Afsar-Manesh, N., Bierman, A. S., Chang, C., Colón-Rodríguez, C. J., Dullabh, P., Duran, D. G., Fair, M., Hernandez-Boussard, T., Hightower, M., et al. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45050 · Cited by 275
Knox, J., Williamson, B., & Bayne, S. (2020) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2019.1623251 · Cited by 261
Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?
Birhane, A., & Prabhu, V. U. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv48630.2021.00158 · Cited by 257
Anxiety, panic and self-optimization: Inequalities and the YouTube algorithm
Bishop, S. (2018) · Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/1354856517736978 · Cited by 253
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2023) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13483 · Cited by 259
Nechushtai, E., & Lewis, S. C. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.043 · Cited by 237
Lo Piano, S. (2020) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-020-0501-9 · Cited by 229
AI hyped? A horizon scan of discourse on artificial intelligence in education (AIED) and development
Nemorin, S., Vlachidis, A., Ayerakwa, H. M., & Andriotis, P. (2023) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2022.2095568 · Cited by 229
Artificial intelligence as digital agency
Ågerfalk, P. J. (2020) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2020.1721947 · Cited by 217
Roselli, D., Matthews, J., & Talagala, N. (2019) · Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3308560.3317590 · Cited by 237
Eight grand challenges in socio-environmental systems modeling
Elsawah, S., Filatova, T., Jakeman, A. J., Kettner, A. J., Zellner, M. L., Athanasiadis, I. N., Hamilton, S. H., Axtell, R. L., Brown, D. G., Gilligan, J. M., et al. (2020) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling · doi:10.18174/sesmo.2020a16226 · Cited by 205
The algorithm audit: Scoring the algorithms that score us
Brown, S., Davidovic, J., & Hasan, A. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951720983865 · Cited by 204
Giovanola, B., & Tiribelli, S. (2023) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01455-6 · Cited by 193
Democratizing Algorithmic Fairness
Wong, P.-H. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00355-w · Cited by 182
Meijer, A., Lorenz, L., & Wessels, M. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13391 · Cited by 174
Emerging technologies and analytics for a new era of value-centered marketing in healthcare
Agarwal, R., Dugas, M., Gao, G. (., & Kannan, P. K. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00692-4 · Cited by 175
Artificial Intelligence in mental health and the biases of language based models
Straw, I., & Callison-Burch, C. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240376 · Cited by 164
The impact of using algorithms for managerial decisions on public employees' procedural justice
Nagtegaal, R. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101536 · Cited by 166
Operationalising ethics in artificial intelligence for healthcare: a framework for AI developers
Solanki, P., Grundy, J., & Hussain, W. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00195-z · Cited by 157
“Although the exponential growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for healthcare is promising, its benefits are being increasingly overshadowed by its propensity to cause individual or societal harm quickly at a large scale [1, 2].”
BackgroundDiscrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making
Borgesius, F. Z. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.13465 · Cited by 152
Putting the data before the algorithm in big data addressing personalized healthcare
Cahan, E. M., Hernandez-Boussard, T., Thadaney-Israni, S., & Rubin, D. L. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0157-2 · Cited by 149
Selten, F., Robeer, M., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2023) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13602 · Cited by 153
Ethical Dimensions of Visualization Research
Correll, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300418 · Cited by 150
Marda, V. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0087 · Cited by 161
The Moral Psychology of Artificial Intelligence
Bonnefon, J.-F., Rahwan, I., & Shariff, A. (2024) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-030123-113559 · Cited by 151
Chowdhury, S., Joel-Edgar, S., Dey, P. K., Bhattacharya, S., & Kharlamov, A. (2023) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2022.2066981 · Cited by 140
Fit for purpose? The GDPR and the governance of European digital health
Marelli, L., Lievevrouw, E., & Van Hoyweghen, I. (2020) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2020.1724929 · Cited by 137
In AI we trust? Citizen perceptions of AI in government decision making
Ingrams, A., Kaufmann, W., & Jacobs, D. (2022) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.276 · Cited by 133
Artificial intelligence in fiction: between narratives and metaphors
Hermann, I. (2023) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01299-6 · Cited by 134
Capturing Clicks: How the Chinese Government Uses Clickbait to Compete for Visibility
Lu, Y., & Pan, J. (2021) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1765914 · Cited by 130
FairSight: Visual Analytics for Fairness in Decision Making
Ahn, Y., & Lin, Y.-R. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2019.2934262 · Cited by 126
It is time for more critical CS education
Ko, A. J., Oleson, A., Ryan, N., Register, Y., Xie, B., Tari, M., Davidson, M., Druga, S., & Loksa, D. (2020) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3424000 · Cited by 127
Just google it! Digital literacy and the epistemology of ignorance
Bhatt, I., & MacKenzie, A. (2019) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1547276 · Cited by 122
Tuning EU equality law to algorithmic discrimination: Three pathways to resilience
Xenidis, R. (2020) · Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law · doi:10.1177/1023263x20982173 · Cited by 123
Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence
Coeckelbergh, M. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4 · Cited by 115
15 challenges for AI: Or what AI (currently) can’t do
Hagendorff, T., & Wezel, K. (2020) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-019-00886-y · Cited by 113
The Tyranny of Data? The Bright and Dark Sides of Data-Driven Decision-Making for Social Good
Lepri, B., Staiano, J., Sangokoya, D., Letouzé, E., & Oliver, N. (2017) · Studies in Big Data · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54024-5_1 · Cited by 111
Relational Expertise: What Machines Can't Know
Pakarinen, P., & Huising, R. (2025) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12915 · Cited by 105
Kaun, A. (2022) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2021.1924827 · Cited by 97
AI, Opacity, and Personal Autonomy
Vaassen, B. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00577-5 · Cited by 94
An impulse to exploit: the behavioral turn in data-driven marketing
Nadler, A., & McGuigan, L. (2018) · Critical Studies in Media Communication · doi:10.1080/15295036.2017.1387279 · Cited by 92
Datafied child welfare services: unpacking politics, economics and power
Redden, J., Dencik, L., & Warne, H. (2020) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2020.1724928 · Cited by 89
Mann, M., & Matzner, T. (2019) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951719895805 · Cited by 88
Anthony, C. (2018) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2016.0334 · Cited by 84
Conservative AI and social inequality: conceptualizing alternatives to bias through social theory
Zajko, M. (2021) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01153-9 · Cited by 83
Gašević, D., Greiff, S., & Shaffer, D. W. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107304 · Cited by 82
Citizen Knowledge: Markets, Experts, and the Infrastructure of Democracy
Herzog, L. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197681718.001.0001 · Cited by 80
Sustainability in computing education: A systematic literature review
Peters, A.-K., Capilla, R., Coroamă, V. C., Heldal, R., Lago, P., Leifler, O., Moreira, A., Fernandes, J. P., Penzenstadler, B., Porras, J., et al. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3639060 · Cited by 78
Should artificial intelligence augment medical decision making? The case for an autonomy algorithm
(2018) · AMA Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1001/amajethics.2018.902 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Doyle, T.
- Venue
- The Information Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-10-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 301-302
- ISSN
- 0197-2243 (ISSN-L)
- 1087-6537
- OpenAlex
- W2764072425
- Cited by
- 3,071
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 561.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.