Cited by 232Physical Activity and HealthCognitive Functions and MemoryCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Aerobic endurance exercise benefits memory and affect in young adults.

Stroth, Sanna, Hille, Katrin, Spitzer, Manfred, Reinhardt, Ralf·2009·Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Abstract

Exercise seems a simple and widely practised behaviour that activates molecular and cellular signalling cascades involved in various central nervous system processes. Despite impressive results obtained in animal studies, fitness interventions have produced less reliable effects in humans, particularly in young adults. In the present study we tested the hypothesis that an individually adapted exercise training consisting of three running sessions of 30 minutes per week for 6 weeks, has the potential to improve visuospatial and verbal memory, concentration performance, and affect in young and healthy adults. Twenty-eight students participated and underwent a graded fitness test to assess individual fitness. The experimental group took part in an aerobic running programme, whereas the control group were asked not to vary their everyday activities. We found a significant increase in visuospatial memory performance and a significant increase in positive affect on a .05 alpha level of significance. However, we observed no effects of running training on concentration performance and verbal memory. We conclude that physical activity can possibly serve as a means to improve positively valenced aspects of affect and benefit visuospatial but not verbal memory in young adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09602010802091183

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In preadolescent children and young adults, aerobic exercise is selectively associated with improved performances on spatial memory tasks and not with less hippocampus dependent tasks such as attention, verbal memory, or item recognition tasks.

    “Moreover, some studies have demonstrated in preadolescent children and young adults that AE is selectively associated with improved performances on contextual (Chaddock et al., 2010, 2011; Monti et al., 2012) and spatial (Stroth et al., 2009; Herting and Nagel, 2012) memory tasks and not with less hippocampus dependent tasks such as attention, verbal memory, or item recognition tasks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stroth, S., Hille, K., Spitzer, M., & Reinhardt, R.
Affiliations
Universität Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
Stroth, Sanna
Venue
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Published
2009-01
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
223-243
ISSN
  • 0960-2011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0694
OpenAlex
W2115192115
Cited by
232
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
aerobic exercise, running training, memory, visuospatial memory, verbal memory, concentration, positive affect, young adults, physical activity
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Physical Endurance, Running, Exercise, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review