Cited by 164Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringRetinal Development and DisordersTactile and Sensory Interactions

Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation

Open access
Nanduri, Devyani, Fine, Ione, Horsager, Alan, Boynton, Geoffrey M., Humayun, Mark S., Greenberg, Robert J., Weiland, James D.·2012·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: In an effort to restore functional form vision, epiretinal prostheses that elicit percepts by directly stimulating remaining retinal circuitry were implanted in human subjects with advanced retinitis pigmentosa RP). In this study, manipulating pulse train frequency and amplitude had different effects on the size and brightness of phosphene appearance. METHODS: Experiments were performed on a single subject with severe RP (implanted with a 16-channel epiretinal prosthesis in 2004) on nine individual electrodes. Psychophysical techniques were used to measure both the brightness and size of phosphenes when the biphasic pulse train was varied by either modulating the current amplitude (with constant frequency) or the stimulating frequency (with constant current amplitude). RESULTS: Increasing stimulation frequency always increased brightness, while having a smaller effect on the size of elicited phosphenes. In contrast, increasing stimulation amplitude generally increased both the size and brightness of phosphenes. These experimental findings can be explained by using a simple computational model based on previous psychophysical work and the expected spatial spread of current from a disc electrode. CONCLUSIONS: Given that amplitude and frequency have separable effects on percept size, these findings suggest that frequency modulation improves the encoding of a wide range of brightness levels without a loss of spatial resolution. Future retinal prosthesis designs could benefit from having the flexibility to manipulate pulse train amplitude and frequency independently (clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT00279500).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.11-8401

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Watson AB. Temporal sensitivity. In: Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP, eds. Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. New York: Wiley; 1986.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nanduri, D., Fine, I., Horsager, A., Boynton, G. M., Humayun, M. S., Greenberg, R. J., & Weiland, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Doheny Eye Institute (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Second Sight Medical Products (US)
Corresponding author
  • Nanduri, Devyani
  • Fine, Ione
  • Horsager, Alan
  • Boynton, Geoffrey M.
  • Humayun, Mark S.
  • Greenberg, Robert J.
  • Weiland, James D.
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2012-01-20
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
205
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W1976408315
Cited by
163
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY014645, R01EY012893, P30EY001730)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
epiretinal prosthesis, retinitis pigmentosa, pulse amplitude, brightness perception, retinal stimulation, spatial resolution
MeSH terms
Blindness, Electrodes, Implanted, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Microelectrodes, Middle Aged, Retina, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Sensory Thresholds, Visual Perception, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review