The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 11,801–11,900 of 12,257
Beck, T. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70581-6_258-1
Fatiregun, O. A., Afisi, O. T., Borisade, B., Sarimiye, F. O., Ola, B., & OHAERI, J. U. (2026) · Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13010-026-00229-y
Towards a memory justice: Statues as epistemic battlegrounds
Benjamin, E. (2026) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/17506980261489066
Wang, J., & Jiang, Z. (2026) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3821402.3830166
Outsourcing Emotions to GenAI: The Risk of Bypassing Identity Development
Lai, T., & Archer, A. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01203-4
Sejdiu, N. P., & Sejdiu, S. (2026) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amag089
Depoliticizing knowledge in doctoral education
Muaquesse, A. E. (2026) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-026-01764-5
Xia, Y., & Sun, M. (2026) · Asian Women · doi:10.64446/aw.2026.9.42.3.503
de Paula, S. R. (2026) · LUMEN ET VIRTUS · doi:10.56238/levv17n64-146
From ethics to epistemology: a decolonial reframing of student AI use in postsecondary education
DiPietro, C. (2026) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2026.2741854
Lamidi, K. O., & Hofisi, C. (2026) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2026.2729948
Lucassen, L., Rinaldi, R., & Batselé, É. (2026) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2026.2737282
(2026) · Cambridge Prisms Global Mental Health · doi:10.1017/gmh.2026.10297.pr15
Byrne, E. A., & Køster, A. (2026) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-026-10215-6
Ciftci, S., Heward-Belle, S. L., Pryor, N., Luu, B., Mayjor, H., Freeman, P., Rees, F., & Lovell, R. C. (2026) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70883
Expanding Epistemic Appropriation
Kok, S. G. (2026) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2026.10146
Dire presque la même chose ? Approches médicale et sociétale de l’autisme
Lancelot, M. (2026) · Études anglaises · doi:10.3917/etan.791.0025
Slonim, A. D., Naveed, M., & Shane, K. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14193244
Detecting and Mitigating Bias in AI Systems: A Methodological Approach to Social Inequality
Grimaccia, E. (2026) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc16100316
Yıldız, G. (2026) · KADEM Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.21798/kadem.2026.226
‘Being’ and ‘Doing’ Neurodivergent Reflexivity in Social Work Practice
Guthrie, J., & Hultman, L. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18034-6_12
Working with Parent-Carers of Neurodivergent Children: Practising Neuro-Inclusive Social Work
Deacon, L., Bikova, Z., Deacon, M., Thurgood, Y., Mitchell, J., & Barrett, M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18034-6_19
Simon, G., Hopper, J. W., Cherniak, A. D., Cassidy, E. K., Skragge, M., & Granqvist, P. (2026) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-026-09672-2
Rosqvist, H. B., Deacon, L., Guthrie, J., & Buckley, A. M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18034-6_2
de Freitas, N. C., Moreira, H. R., Romeu, M. C., & Barroso, M. C. D. S. (2026) · Gondola/Góndola, enseñanza y aprendizaje de las ciencias · doi:10.14483/23464712.23614
Revelation as a Legitimate Epistemic Source: Rethinking the Limits of Contemporary EpistemologyPreprint
Maku, S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10713093/v1
Vuong, Q., Sari, N. P. W. P., & Nguyen, M.-H. (2026) · Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · doi:10.28945/5880
Boult, C. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05816-2
Creative Methods in Neuro-inclusive Social Work Research and Education
Buckley, A. M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18034-6_24
Algorithmic gaslighting in healthcare: mechanisms, harms, and epistemic injustice in context
Onder, O. (2026) · Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13010-026-00235-0
Relational Inequality and the Social Uptake of Speech
Stoljar, N., & Litalien, É. (2026) · The Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10892-026-09586-4
The Ecology of ActualizationPreprint
Torkaman, H. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7544518
“I AM THE LAW”: JUDGE DREDD AS AN ALLEGORY OF ALGORITHMIC GOVERNANCE AND EPISTEMIC AUTHORITY
Serpil, H. (2026) · The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication · doi:10.7456/tojdac.1993315
Mtshali, B. (2026) · E-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences · doi:10.38159/ehass.2026782
Guthrie, J. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18034-6_26
Creating an Inclusive and Relationally Attuned Research Space for Neurodivergent Participants
Dark, J. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18034-6_23
Palmer, D. A., Phillips, D., & Runeckles, A. (2026) · Families Relationships and Societies · doi:10.1332/20467435y2026d000000099
The Epistemic Floor: Institutional Conditions for Genuine Inclusion in Psychiatric Classification
Zeller, M. (2026) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2026.10150
Hewitt, O. M., Larkin, M., & Langdon, P. E. (2026) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jar.70313
Buraschi, D. (2026) · Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l integration et de la migration internationale · doi:10.1007/s12134-026-01443-5
Hernáez, Á. M. (2026) · Distinktion Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1080/1600910x.2026.2738463
Bissenbayeva, A. (2026) · Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict · doi:10.1075/jlac.00158.bis
Effective Worker Resistance and Realist Ideology Critique
Aytaç, U., & Alakavuklar, O. N. (2026) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-026-06491-6
The disruptive insider: black women, epistemic dissent, and the politics of institutional belonging
Babafemi, E. (2026) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2026.2743201
Doomsday Saviours: On the Agency of Indigenous Objects in Nepal
Shrestha, A. (2026) · Geo Geography and Environment · doi:10.1002/geo2.70106
Gray, M., Akbaş, E., & Meng, Q. (2026) · Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work · doi:10.1080/26408066.2026.2739257
Justice with Rather Than Justice for: Sex Workers, Epistemic Justice and Creative Research
Sandy, L., & Matthews, D. (2026) · Sexuality Research and Social Policy · doi:10.1007/s13178-026-01418-2
Carter, C., & Stephens, J. B. (2026) · The Clinical Teacher · doi:10.1111/tct.70544
Addressing the risk of disproportionate maternal mortality among black and brown women
Ebanks, C. (2026) · British Journal of Midwifery · doi:10.12968/bjom.2025.0136
Restoring Pono in Native Hawaiian Communities: Historical Trauma and Resilience Across Generations
Su'esu'e, A., Greywolf, C. T., Smith, H., Kaneakua, J. P., Keyes, K. B., & Riley, L. (2026) · Genealogy · doi:10.3390/genealogy10040155
Majola, E., & Madimabe-Mofokeng, M. (2026) · Educational Research for Social Change · doi:10.17159/2221-4070/2026/v15i0a8
“Their body is their territory”: Reproductive autonomy and governance by omission in Peru
Carrasco, M., Cordova-Gomez, A., Sartur, A., Horowitz, D., & Dinev, M. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119916
(2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83797-607-220261010
Life Course, Care, and Buddhist Self-Cultivation: Asymmetrical Aging in Charles Johnson’s “China”
Yu, R. (2026) · Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction · doi:10.1080/00111619.2026.2743897
Fielder, H., Kelly, R. K., & Griffin, P. (2026) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70901
Cobbaert, L., Elwyn, R., Downs, J. L., James, S., & Jackman, M. R. (2026) · PLOS mental health. · doi:10.1371/journal.pmen.0000741
Towani, J. Y., & John, V. M. (2026) · Educational Research for Social Change · doi:10.17159/2221-4070/2026/v15i0a11
Botlholo, K. (2026) · South African Journal of African Languages · doi:10.1080/02572117.2026.2695628
Delusion as a fundamental phenomenon ( Urphänomen ): implications for phenomenological psychotherapy
Irarrázaval, L. (2026) · Psychosis · doi:10.1080/17522439.2026.2738554
Theoretical analysis of approaches to defining the phenomenon of hypocrisy
Gruzinova, K. (2026) · Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Psychology · doi:10.17721/bpsy.2026.1(23).4
Navigating Knowledge Systems in Intercultural Science Education
Lorduy, D. J., Nisperuza, E. P. F., & Adúriz–Bravo, A. (2026) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-026-00786-w
Universities, science, and politics
Pamuk, Z., Herzog, L. M., Moore, A., Brown, M. B., & Holst, C. (2026) · Contemporary Political Theory · doi:10.1057/s41296-026-00853-5
Understanding social and scientific conflicts shaping modern wildlife conservation
Daimary, R., Kumar, S., Kumar, R., & Kumar, A. (2026) · Discover Environment · doi:10.1007/s44274-026-01066-8
Tiredness and the Capacity to Decide: The Example of Maternity Care
Brunning, L. (2026) · Bioethics · doi:10.1111/bioe.70199
Ntshoe, I. M., & Masonto, R. X. (2026) · Educational Research for Social Change · doi:10.17159/2221-4070/2026/v15i0a2
Scenarios and Sense-Making... Given to Forethought
Snowden, D. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-72871-0_13
Against Deficit Naming: Towards an African-Centred Rehumanisation of TVET Learners
Nendauni, L. (2026) · Educational Research for Social Change · doi:10.17159/2221-4070/2026/v15i0a15
Doe, P. (2026) · Circular Economy and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43615-026-01154-0
Perspectivas filosófico-políticas contemporáneas: reflexiones y debates para el siglo XXI
Betancourt, S. A. U., Ortiz-Jaramillo, D., Valdebenito, N. M. F., & Álvarez, F. (2026) · doi:10.31207/uhediciones23
Dziwak, D. (2026) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1017765
Kurniawan, R. P. (2026) · Journal of Economic Epistemology and Philosophy · doi:10.55942/jeep.v1i2.2296
Price, J. M., & Moore, A. S. (2026) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111519975-001
Rethinking epistemic authority in mathematics education
Nordkild, S. I., & Johannessen, I. L. (2026) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-026-10568-4
Halldenius, L., & Petersén, M. (2024) · Lund Human Rights Reports and Working Papers · doi:10.68396/tgz44608
Brunner, C. (2026) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111519975-005
Ninco, Y. A., Lopes, M. V. D. O., da Silva, V. M., Barreiro, R. G., Bergeron, D. A., & Galvão, M. T. G. (2026) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/nup.70128
Indigenous Knowledge Stewardship in AI-Enabled Technology Education
Seleke, B. (2026) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia6100220
Alhuzail, N. A., & Mahajne, I. (2026) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcag236
Whose responsibility? Deconstructing global responsible AI from the African lens: a review
Eke, D., Nkwo, M. S., Jaja, I. R., Adamu, M. S., Akintoye, S., Ugom, M. K., & Kiden, S. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01418-3
The white credibility paradigm and the silencing of global south scholars
Kuradusenge-McLeod, C. (2026) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2026.2743202
Performing inclusion: How settler institutions regulate Indigenous women through epistemic violence
Bargallie, D., & Carlson, B. L. (2026) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783112222881-035
Olsen, C. B. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960256.003.0145
Promises, Pitfalls, and Potential of Engaging Students in Assessment
Brewster, A. E., Strickland-Hughes, C. M., Frey, T., Hiebert, S., Ko, M. E., Signorini, A., & Slown, C. D. (2026) · Intersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning · doi:10.61669/001c.170704
The Politics of Conceptualization
Henne, C., Huetter‐Almerigi, Y., & Santarelli, M. (2026) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/anag066
Rosihan, A., Sarwono, B. K., & Pasandaran, C. C. (2026) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2026.2743159
Huppatz, E., McKinstry, C., Whiteford, G. E., & George, E. (2026) · Australian Occupational Therapy Journal · doi:10.1111/1440-1630.70131
Wailling, J., Middleton, L., Cameron, G., & Berry, C. (2026) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70897
Minority Stress and Resilience Among Autistic-trans Adolescents
Rubin, A. (2026) · Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver) · doi:10.56902/etdcrp.2026.188
Bradshaw, B. A., Elby, A., & Stowe, R. L. (2026) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.70106
The Weight of Warming Seas: A Feminist Analysis of Eco-Anxiety Among Indonesian Women
Hayati, Y., Ghaluh, B. M., Nursaid, N., & Wulandari, E. (2026) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/09593535261494638
Open but not temporally synchronous: temporal asymmetries in scholarly infrastructures
Arwendria, A., & Oktavia, A. (2026) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/lht-05-2026-0130
Discursos de odio, disputas por la verdad, epistemicidio y crisis democrática en el Sur GlobalPreprint
Cerda, J. S. G., & Roux, C. I. P. (2026) · doi:10.1590/scielopreprints.17976
Envidia: imitar, suplantar y aparentar
Forero, F. E. M. (2026) · doi:10.62486/978-9915-9928-6-0.ch04
Stoian, M.-E. (2026) · European Journal of Women s Studies · doi:10.1177/13505068261488758
Børhaug, F. B., Dansholm, K. K., Haarr, K. H., & Eriksen, S. S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-04504-1_15
Társadalmi és szakmai viszonyulás a fogyatékosságmetaforákban
Czövek, A., & Domonkosi, Á. (2026) · Magyar Nyelvőr · doi:10.1556/200.2026.01015
Ira: utilizar la inteligencia artificial para dañar
Polanía, L. R. (2026) · doi:10.62486/978-9915-9928-6-0.ch06
AVES Mental Health: Centering Lived Experience in Global Mental Health Systems Transformation
Sunkel, C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70134-9_96-2
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
