The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 12,001–12,100 of 12,257
Carrasco-Madariaga, J., Aapblaza-Santis, M., & Castillo-Parada, T. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11221715/v1
Palmer, D. A. (2026) · Mental Health and Social Inclusion · doi:10.1108/mhsi-08-2026-0307
Kaygın, E. E. (2026) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub1484.c5911
Rethinking critical agrarian studies on Turkey through a more-than-human lens
Özkul, C. U. (2026) · New Perspectives on Turkey · doi:10.1017/npt.2026.10102
Play as epistemic practice: neuroaffirming therapeutic knowing
Perri, N. (2026) · Subjectivity · doi:10.1057/s41286-026-00258-0
Felsefe Grubu Eğitiminde Yeni Eğilimler
(2026) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub1484
Altin, T. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069261492119
Ajibade, A. O. (2026) · Milky Way Scientific Journal · doi:10.65021/mwsj.v2.i3.58
Argumentative Resistance and Non-Ideal Argumentation
Marchal, A. H. (2026) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-026-10505-3
Wescott, S., & Roberts, S. (2026) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540253.2026.2740257
Who reviews the reviews? When AI encounters academic aesthetics
Qu, C. (2026) · Scottish Geographical Journal · doi:10.1080/14702541.2026.2737673
Let Geography Die: Chasing Derwent’s Ghost at Harvard
Silvey, R. M., Barnes, T., Blount, J. M., Flad, R. K., Wright, R. A., Patricia, L., Bailey, L., Farish, M., Burridge, A., Hawkins, R., et al. (2026) · The AAG Review of Books · doi:10.1080/2325548x.2026.2731353
Wang, H., Yang, Q., & Zheng, Y. (2026) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2025-0361
Jiang, Q. (2026) · International Journal of Education and Humanities · doi:10.54097/xkftz730
Ikoona, E. N., Namulemo, L., Sinnah, M. M., Vandi, M. A., & Sahr, F. (2026) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2026.100882
Hammond, K. (2026) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcag265
Kozik, E. (2026) · Kultura i Społeczeństwo · doi:10.35757/kis.2026.70.3.11
Adewale, S., & Ndwandwe, N. D. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-02234-x
Peña, S. H. (2026) · Esfera Pública Revista en Gobernanza y Sociedad · doi:10.55555/ep.8.80
Preparing Pre-Service Teachers for Epistemic Agency in Borderland Communities
Oemig, P. A. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-1388-5.ch006
Amazige, P. E. (2026) · International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique · doi:10.1007/s11196-026-10578-8
Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., & Ghamrawi, N. A. R. (2026) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2026.2745837
Law and Development: Past, Present, and Future
Davis, K. E. (2026) · The Law and Development Review · doi:10.1515/ldr-2026-0099
Condition Knowing: A Nursing Approach to Addressing Health Injustice
Fyers, K., McBride‐Henry, K., & Woods, M. (2026) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.70778
Aultman, J. M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-1629-1_11-1
Whose transition is being evaluated? How should the evaluator position themselves in practice?
O’Donnell, J., Demetriades, S., McCulloch, L., & Schmidt-Abbey, B. (2026) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/13563890261491345
Cerda, P. A. N., Páez, M. A. G., & García, M. E. A. (2026) · Athenea Digital Revista de pensamiento e investigación social · doi:10.5565/rev/athenea.3866
Stress and Resilience in Bi+ People’s Conversations About Hate Speech
Denes, A., Henningham, M., Crowley, J. P., & Pappas, S. (2026) · Journal of Bisexuality · doi:10.1080/15299716.2026.2737950
Mpofu, N., & Xeketwana, S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7629801
Beyond passive rights-holders: toward student moral agency in assessment fairness
Rasooli, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.2011570
Innocence by Accreditation: Mythic Branding and Audit Feminism in Athena Swan
Arandjelović, O. (2026) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2026.10111
Pérez‐Jover, V., González, S. T., Ruiz‐Cantero, M. T., Peiró, A. P., & Jiménez-García, S. (2026) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci15100717
Children and Young People’s Voices in Digital Mental Health
Puspakesuma, N., Kerasidou, A., & Pavarini, G. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197779033.003.0016
Towards a Blended Leadership Framework for Disrupted Schooling Systems
Khumalo, S. S. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83742-526-620261009
Are medical curricula dead or alive?
Ebeling, U. (2026) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.70346
Этическая экспертиза инновационных биотехнологий: принцип «не навреди» в условиях неопределенности
Мыльникова, И. С. (2026) · Медицинская этика НАУЧНЫЙ МЕДИЦИНСКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ · doi:10.24075/medet.2026.030
The presumption of innocence, epistemic distortion, and penal governance
Gonzalez, V. V. (2026) · Punishment & Society · doi:10.1177/14624745261499355
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.003.0013
Cuenca-Soto, N., Santos-Pastor, M., Chiva-Bartoll, Ò., & Muñoz, L. F. M. (2026) · Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education · doi:10.1007/s42322-026-00265-4
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.003.0004
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.003.0009
Sugimoto, M. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05862-w
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.003.0001
Generative Artificial Intelligence and Distributive Epistemic Justice
Kwok, C. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01225-y
Alice and Bob, The Three Inevitabilities, and The Perfect AI Assistant
Naser, M. Z. (2026) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-026-00299-7
Staudt, A., & Noone, C. (2026) · International Journal of Transgender Health · doi:10.1080/26895269.2026.2737294
Fragile against what? Imagining climate change resilience by unmasking governance fragility
Vahedi, L., & Logie, C. H. (2026) · Disasters · doi:10.1111/disa.70072
When “Human” Stops Tracking: An Epistemology of Boundary-Eroding Biotechnology
Zhang, X., Bao, S., & Han, L. (2026) · Global Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10516-026-09819-z
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.001.0001
H. Sapiens as an Undeveloped Species
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.003.0006
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.003.0011
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.003.0014
Non-Ideal Theory, Pragmatism, and the Early-Stage Approach
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.005.0001
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.003.0012
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.003.0008
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.003.0010
From Micro to Macro on Human Development
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.003.0005
Chang, L. C. (2026) · Sociology Lens · doi:10.1111/johs.70093
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.005.0002
Inayati, N. L., Khamami, K., Sutisna, A., Sulistyo, A., Steinberg, S. S., & Sabry, N. S. (2026) · Multicultural Islamic Education Review · doi:10.23917/mier.v4i2.18835
Schellenberg, J. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197902141.003.0003
Between Letter and Spirit: Introducing Kinship Relations into the NAGPRA Consultation Process
Sullivan-Clarke, A., & Thomas, J.-L. (2026) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2026.2731549
Worldview Silencing: Recognizing Reasoned Objections to Brain Death
McCurdy, J. H., Hine, A., & Campelia, G. D. (2026) · Bioethics · doi:10.1111/bioe.70205
Boer, N., Jovanovski, N., & Saling, L. L. (2026) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2026.2750443
Mohammed, A. (2026) · Studies in Media and Communication · doi:10.11114/smc.v14i4.9433
McMahon, D., Rutherford, T., Smout, R., McGregor, L., Pellizzer, M. L., & Balzan, R. P. (2026) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.70762
Designing dialogic fiction writing through local Folklore in Indonesian junior high schools
Setyorini, R., Suwandi, S., & Andayani (2026) · Research Journal in Advanced Humanities · doi:10.58256/pnkjn505
Disabled enough? Public health and Lysias’s For the Disabled Man
Ricciardi, G. E. (2026) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdag074
Ramalepe, L. M. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1988663
Hassouni, G. E., & Oraba, J. B. (2026) · Critical Studies on Security · doi:10.1080/21624887.2026.2736999
Knowing Long COVID: Epistemic Barriers to Recognition and Care
Jamoulle, M., Spanoghe, M., Rolus, B., Thielemans, P., & Widmer, D. (2026) · Journal of Primary Care & Community Health · doi:10.1177/21501319261495377
ХИШИГДУЛАМ, Н. (2026) · Professional education in the modern world · doi:10.20913/2224-1841-2026-3-20
黄辉煌, Lin, Z., & Lin, H. (2026) · Sport Education and Society · doi:10.1080/13573322.2026.2750449
Between automation and epistemic autonomy: reappropriating generative AI in global academic writing
Thinh, M. P. (2026) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2026.2751093
Epistemic Insecurity: A Critique
O’Mahony, P. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0278-120420260000042012
Mashungu, E., Chipfunde, D., & Rusinga, R. (2026) · doi:10.68050/jams.2026.756
Tourism experiences of visually impaired tourists: an embodied agency perspective
Chen, L., He, X., Tang, C., & Pang, H. (2026) · Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1080/10941665.2026.2692394
Navigating LGBTQ+ Inclusion and Conservative Religious Beliefs With Compassion and Respect
Stones, A., & Jayne, H. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80686-909-120261021
Žažar, K. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0278-120420260000042016
Coşkun, U. H., & Uçar, S. (2026) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2026.2750943
Barriers to Independence and Agency: Visually Impaired Students in China
Lin, Y. (. (2026) · Critical Debates in Humanities Science and Global Justice · doi:10.68709/001c.160319
Özgür, Ö. (2026) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcag268
Williams, C. L. (2026) · Utambuzi Journal for the Study of the Religions of Africa and its Diaspora · doi:10.36615/tk4gh948
Design for Recognition and Its Dangers
van Uffelen, N., & Secomandi, F. D. C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-34028-3_5
Rizzotti, A., & Feliciano, H. C. (2026) · Frontiers The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad · doi:10.36366/frontiers.v38i2.1333
Algorithmic Exploitation and Recognition Struggles
Senf, C., & Pedersen, L. H. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-34028-3_2
MOTIVAÇÃO NA ATENÇÃO A USUÁRIOS DE SUBSTÂNCIAS: UMA PERSPECTIVA DA PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL
Barbosa, E. A., & Pimentel, J. N. (2026) · Periódicos Brasil Pesquisa Científica · doi:10.36557/2674-9432.2026v5n8p887-898
Why Conservation-Induced Displacement is Wrong
Ezugwu, R. O. (2026) · Res Publica · doi:10.1007/s11158-026-09794-7
Simon, W. R. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01211-4
Struggles for Recognition in the Digitalizing Workplace
Anderson, J. H. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-34028-3_3
Educación ambiental inclusiva y Buen Vivir: equidad entre niñeses sordas y oyentes
Trujillo, W. A. L., & Vanegas, C. T. (2026) · Educación y Educadores · doi:10.5294/edu.2026.29.2.6
Laura, M. T. (2020) · Revista Multidisciplinar Epistemología de las Ciencias · doi:10.71112/bm2s8p72
Gao, C., Tadesse, E., & Khalid, S. (2026) · Lecture notes in educational technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-5197-1_4
Algorithmic Authority and Epistemic Trust
Shin, D. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-39278-7_4
Gatley, J. (2026) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhag055
Workplace drug testing experiences: A qualitative analysis of structural challenges
Balıca, K., Aksoy, D., Ovat, D. Y., & Akgür, S. A. (2026) · Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health · doi:10.1080/15555240.2026.2750862
Poverty in Mexico: From Measurements to Lived Experiences
Hernández, G. D., & Frías, S. M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-6490-3_110-1
Addressing Inequality in Global Poverty Research: Ethics, Power, and Epistemic Justice
Aker, D. Y. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-6490-3_86-1
Poloka, P., Constantinescu, C., & Constantinescu, M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7649363
Contrahistorias de médicas mexicanas frente a la violencia de género
Lozano, M. V. (2026) · GénEroos Revista de investigación y divulgación sobre los estudios de género · doi:10.53897/revgener.2026.8.4
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
