The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 11,901–12,000 of 12,257
Credential farming in the age of generative AI: relocating trust from outputs to communitiesPreprint
Agyemang, G. O., AL-Louzi, R., Bawoke, M. M., Bender, C., Celi, L. A., Chavan, N., Gorijavolu, R., Halac, D., Jaiswal, N., Mikolutskaya, S., et al. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10944586/v1
Steele, S. L., & Abereoje, K. (2026) · Critical Public Health · doi:10.1080/09581596.2026.2737489
Soberbia: creer que la inteligencia artificial lo sabe todo
de la Cruz, J. E. H., Polanía, L. R., & Castillo, V. S. (2026) · doi:10.62486/978-9915-9928-6-0.ch01
Lynn, T., O’Gorman, C., Christoforidi, I., Cowley-Cunningham, M. B., Hiedanpää, J., Jokinen, M., Bjärstig, T., Tonković, A. B., & Peña, J. J. D. (2026) · Mountain Research and Development · doi:10.1659/mrd.2025.00071
Hall, M., & Chollier, M. (2026) · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x261494214
Avaricia: concentrar el poder, los datos y los beneficios
Suárez, Y. S., Castillo, V. S., & Morales, C. E. B. (2026) · doi:10.62486/978-9915-9928-6-0.ch02
Visser, R., & Murris, K. (2026) · Children & Society · doi:10.1111/chso.70103
Lujuria: la fascinación desbordada por lo artificial
Gamboa, A. J. P. (2026) · doi:10.62486/978-9915-9928-6-0.ch03
From social contagion to community cascade: A generative model of recovery
Patton, D., Collinson, B., & Hillios, J. (2026) · Community Development · doi:10.1080/15575330.2026.2746116
Words against walls: Prisoners’ letters, lay penology and exceptional confinement
Santorso, S., & Nocente, M. (2026) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639261494520
Gichuru, E. N., & Rukooko, A. B. (2026) · The International Information & Library Review · doi:10.1080/10572317.2026.2744455
Sangwa, S. (2026) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS AND CULTURAL PRACTICE · doi:10.56201/ijrcp.vol.10.no4.2025.pg254.272
Bakken, A. K., Mengshoel, A. M., & Synnes, O. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1080/17482631.2026.2745089
Fernandes, H. M. M., Pires, M. O., Drummond, A. M. A., & Abath, A. J. (2026) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-026-03202-9
Leading for a Fragmented World
Brown, C. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009871990 · Cited by 1
Power and Trust in the Classroom: An Activity to Establish Community Norms in Democratic Pedagogy
Maldonado, J. T., & Day, E. L. (2026) · The journal of college science teaching · doi:10.1080/0047231x.2026.2743194
McFashion, C. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-8412-2.ch010
‘That’s my life there…in paper’: reclaiming the record for survivors of the Magdalene Laundries
Dale, E. (2026) · Archives and Records · doi:10.1080/23257962.2026.2720641
De-diagnosis and the problem of revisability in adult ADHD and autism
Adamou, M., & Hill, D. (2026) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2026.1944117
Garasic, M. D. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01432-5
XV—Ignorance and the Harm of Death
Hofweber, T. (2026) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) · doi:10.1093/arisoc/aoag030
Understanding barriers to quality healthcare in rare diseases
Quintal, A., Hotte, É., Grenier, A., Hébert, C., Carreau, I., Berthiaume, Y., & Racine, É. (2026) · Chronic Illness · doi:10.1177/17423953261491392
From cyberspeak to algorithmic newspeak: soft derogation and the ethics of AI-generated language
Kardum, M., & Skelac, I. (2026) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-05-2026-1196
Cui, H., & Gao, X. A. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261497004
Adu, K. O. (2026) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Sociality Studies · doi:10.38140/ijss-2026.vol6.2.04
Rural Higher Education as Misrecognition: Reconstructing the Agrarian University from Latin America
Robayo, M. Y. D., Zuluaga‐Domínguez, C. M., & Domínguez, A. P. Y. S. (2026) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc16100339
Gaber, S. N., Mattsson, E., Klarare, A., Lundström, J. E., & Rapaport, P. (2026) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-026-03061-0
Kilwake, R. W., & Ongare, R. M. (2026) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Science Engineering and Technology · doi:10.32628/ijsrset2613530
Ott, T. J., Bobrowicz, R., LaCouter, T., & Gruber, J. (2026) · Critical Research on Religion · doi:10.1177/20503032261493465
Schwarzfuchs, E. N., Orenstein, D. E., Ben‐Ami, D., & Dayan, T. (2026) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.70452
Liu, Q. (2026) · Journal of Psychology & Education · doi:10.66581/adgcj608
Algorithmic Empowerment: The Fair Allocation of Visibility in Platformized Publics
Kwok, C. (2026) · Media Technology and Governance · doi:10.1177/29777984261494012
Narrative nursing: A primary ethical practice
Erbay, H. (2026) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/09697330261490914
Tirivangasi, H. M., & Kontinen, T. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198986201.003.0021
Boser, E. K., Dörmann, L., & Ellerich-Groppe, N. (2026) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-026-03014-7
Interpersonal doxastic obligations
Heil, R. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05830-4
Can Truth Be Borne Here? Disclosure and Ecclesial Repair After Abuse
Pardue, B. M. (2026) · Open Theology · doi:10.1515/opth-2025-0086
A formal model of cooperative learning for understanding and epistemic progress
Linzi, A. (2026) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-026-01807-9
Ozery, T. R., & Shapira‐Lishchinsky, O. (2026) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508422.2026.2741150
Dochania, A. (2026) · Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education · doi:10.64899/2151-0407.1882
Santander, E. (2026) · Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education · doi:10.64899/2151-0407.1925
Performative equality and state feminism
Huan, M., Lee, M. W., & Rhee, S.-C. (2026) · Journal of Language and Politics · doi:10.1075/jlp.25350.hua
Masduri, M., Hadinata, F., & Adian, D. G. (2026) · Teosofi Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam · doi:10.15642/teosofi.2026.16.1.219-246
Inclusive community, work and family: imagining global futures through local contexts
Santos, C., Stumbitz, B., Anderson, D., & de Paula, V. A. F. (2026) · Community Work & Family · doi:10.1080/13668803.2026.2739197
Imagining the Invisible: Judicial Epistemology, Carceral Regulation, and the Liberal State
Dagan, N., & Zimran, A. (2026) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.70215
Whose Growth? Reimagining Spiritual Formation as a Site of Social Justice in Theological Education
Maguire, A. (2026) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel17101197
Lived experience: it is not what I have, it shaped who I am
Zwijnenburg, J., Karbouniaris, S., & Napan, K. (2026) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2026.2748333
Researching transnational mobility and education: toward learning mobility for epistemic justice
Guo, S. (2026) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2026.2745865
GenAI utilization and the cognitive outsourcing paradox in library and information science
Kyprianos, K., & Moustakas, G. (2026) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/09610006261493523
Chowdhary, C., & Whitfield, M. (2026) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003740414
Negi, B. (2024) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/979-8-88730-864-720251014
Poernomo, G., Amrullah, M. A., Setyawan, F., Yulianingsih, I., & Wahyudi, E. (2026) · Semarang Law Review (SLR) · doi:10.26623/slr.v7i2.13185
Making Sense of Incidental Hermeneutical Injustice: The Problem of Incidental Marginalisation
Luzzi, F., & McGlynn, A. (2026) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2026.10136
The Social Work Classroom as a Ground for Peacebuilding
Coulter, J., & Duffy, J. (2026) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci15100703
Deurman, C., Brinkman, V., Slagboom, N., Jet, B., & Vos, H. (2026) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2026.100884
Wray, B., Vercammen, A., Zeitz, L., Wright, S., Burrows, V.-E., Yamazaki, J., Ali, S. J., Hill, K., Tiatia-Siau, J., Wangmo, K., et al. (2026) · BMC Global and Public Health · doi:10.1186/s44263-026-00321-7
Relational Approaches to Developing Federal Flood Tools in Indian CountryPreprint
King, P. I., Merrill, S. C., Koliba, C., Bell, D., Raub, K. B., Crow, L., Gilmore, R., Lee, C., Couch, G., & Fedoroff, M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7607404
Thellefsen, M., & Friedman, A. (2026) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.70132
Children’s Education in Prison: A Social Ecological Perspective
Little, R. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-23120-8_4
Li, R., Zhang, L., & Feng, S. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2744497
Husain, W. (2026) · American International Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences · doi:10.46545/t01r0x19
Saunders, K., & Roberts, L. (2026) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2026.100883
Zada, O. C. (2026) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2026.2747272
López‐Sáez, M. Á., Méndez, R. L. P., & García, J. E. N. (2026) · Áreas Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales · doi:10.14198/areas.33921
The Imprint of a Few: Editorial Authority and Epistemic Inequalities in Elite Biology Journals
Benz, P., Céspedes, L., Isla, M. M., Pradier, C., Shokida, N. S., Larivière, V., & Kozlowski, D. (2026) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00380261261488637
Herold, K. R. (2026) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-07-2026-0440
Herrera, L. M. (2026) · VETNET Conference Series · doi:10.21240/vetcon/2026/ecer/56
Community Engagement in Epidemic Response: A Decolonial and Indigenous Approach
Hafez, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197851449.003.0631
Gupta, D. (2024) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/979-8-88730-864-720251011
Christy, I. C. A., & Karthiga, R. K. J. (2026) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2026.1916810
Ruiz-Bailén, M., & Ruiz-Iniesta, M. D. C. (2026) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.70673
Maboa, M., & Horne, J. S. (2026) · OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development · doi:10.64211/oidaijsd191006
The Aims of the Sexual Revolution
Tadros, V. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198904434.003.0011
Righetto, G. G., Ractz, G. V., & Tonolli, T. G. (2026) · Investigación Bibliotecológica Archivonomía Bibliotecología e Información · doi:10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2026.107.59191
Berio, L. (2026) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-12678691
Omoijiade, P. O. (2026) · Journal of the Academy · doi:10.47058/joa15.13
Barrington, M., Devery, M. J., Trollor, J. N., Brooker, K., Greef, R. D., Adrian, S., Michalski, S. C., Hind, T., Humphreys, S., & Foley, K. (2026) · Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1080/23297018.2026.2739310
Nodipha, O. G., & Mdhluli, N. I. (2026) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2026.1957241
Tadros, V. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198904434.003.0002
Tadros, V. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198904434.003.0006
Consent to Sex in an Unjust World
Tadros, V. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198904434.003.0010
Freedom, Coercion, and Causation
Tadros, V. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198904434.003.0005
Consent, Intent, and Communication
Tadros, V. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198904434.003.0003
The epistemic dilemma: social proof as a threat to intellectual autonomy in the academy
Tresna, I. C., Premananto, G. C., & Rofiuddin, M. (2026) · Quality Assurance in Education · doi:10.1108/qae-01-2026-0035
Daoism, Social Justice and Global Citizenship Education
Dang, J. (2026) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003770855
The Centrality of Consent to Sex
Tadros, V. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198904434.003.0004
The Ethics of Research with Young Children
Alderson, P. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/979-8-88730-906-420251006
Consent and the Sexual Revolution
Tadros, V. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780198904434.001.0001
Quayle, A. F., Sonn, C. C., Ali, L., Balla, P., Jackson, K., Jayawardana, R. J., & Castro, A. M. P. (2026) · Journal of Humanistic Psychology · doi:10.1177/00221678261489052
Holzer, F. S. (2026) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-026-10628-7
Tadros, V. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198904434.003.0001
Sex Beyond the Scope of Consent
Tadros, V. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198904434.003.0008
Tadros, V. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198904434.003.0009
When Error Causes Sexual Consent
Tadros, V. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198904434.003.0007
Aidants, professionnels, personnes concernées. Les effets du domicile sur le travail de care
Heijboer, C., Lenzi, C., & Petiau, A. (2026) · Revue française des affaires sociales · doi:10.3917/rfas.263.0043
Lord, M.-M., Laliberté, S., Gaudet, R., Poulin, V., & Drolet, M.-J. (2025) · Travail social. · doi:10.7202/1127502ar
Feedback as a credibility encounter: epistemic injustice and the foreclosure of subjectification
Myers, T. (2026) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-026-01797-w
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
