The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 12,101–12,200 of 12,257
Detecting Biased Arguments: A Site for Argumentative InjusticePreprint
Tajuddin, A. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11462541/v1
Respect My Authority! Nurse Practitioner Leadership and the Problem of Legitimate Authority
Sims, J. J. (2026) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/nup.70133
Boundaries and Bridges: The Complex Alliance Between Counselling and Learning Theories
Borbély-Pecze, T. B., & McCarthy, J. (2026) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-026-10040-1
Navigating New Disability as a Sociotechnical Process
Xue, W., Pereira, K. R., Hicks, T., Das, M., & Gadiraju, V. (2026) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3797867.3829064
Seleke, B. (2026) · New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.1007/s40841-026-00495-6
Introduction: Polyphony and Silence as Counter-hegemonic Tools
Avgerinou, M., Solà, N. C., & Ruud, S. F. (2026) · Culture as Text · doi:10.1515/cat-2026-0013
Özçelik, M. (2026) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2025-0325
LEADERSHIP, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, AND ACCOUNTABILITY
Sangwa, S., & Mutabazi, P. (2026) · doi:10.65655/ocp.m30.c117
Oliveira, G. (2026) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/01614681261498987
Data Authority and Digital Hermeneutical Injustice
Gao, Y., & Bai, H. (2026) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-026-01075-0
Batterbee, R., & Kurup, C. (2026) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.70799
Vroemen, S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7654018
Bateman, K. M., Conrath, B., McCausland, J., & McDonald, S. (2026) · Cultural Studies of Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11422-026-10304-7
Mahon, D. (2026) · Mental Health and Social Inclusion · doi:10.1108/mhsi-08-2026-0330
Qiu, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.70400
Carrillo, V. P. (2026) · Interacciones · doi:10.68543/int.v6i6.7692
Salvo, M. D. (2026) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781042001231
Webb, M. R. (2026) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.70133
LLMs and attentional injustice in philosophy
Slater, J. (2026) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-026-09932-y
Border Perspective: Migration Studies in Dark Times
Khosravi, S. (2026) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00380261261497798
The Architecture of Impunity: The Presumption of State Obligation in Environmental Justice Theory
Edusei, K. (2026) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2026.2748164
Roselló‐Peñaloza, M., Mendoza, L. Q., Álvarez‐Aguado, I., & Farhang, M. (2026) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2026.2743694
Hernández, F. M. B., & L.-Dellamary, L. E. (2026) · Revista Culturales · doi:10.22234/recu.202614.1469
Tian, X., Sun, S., & Xu, L. (2026) · Cambridge Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/0305764x.2026.2737660
Sciberras, C., & Schembri, H. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-5492-7_5
Linguistic Citizenship Inside and Beyond the Coloniality of English
Anthonie, A. N., & Oostendorp, M. (2026) · World Englishes · doi:10.1111/weng.70068
Advice Inequality in Personal Networks: Do Gender Dynamics Matter?
Dubash, S., Schafer, M. H., & Kyeremeh, E. (2026) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/01902725261494522
Social Architecture as a strategic response to the challenges of digital epistemic neocolonialism
Kurochkin, A., & Luk'yanova, G. (2026) · Journal of Political Research · doi:10.12737/2587-6295-2026-10-3s-7
Guzzi, A. C., dos Santos, F. B. P., Franzese, C., Peria, P. V. G., Arantes, L. B., & Teixeira, M. A. C. (2026) · Teaching Public Administration · doi:10.1177/01447394261502447
‘I Just Wanted It to End’: Sensory Experiences of Autistic Women During Pregnancy and Childbirth
Brilhante, A. V. M., Brasil, C. C. P., de Silva, R. M., Sampaio, L. A. D. M., Saboia, L. K. M., & Amorim, M. M. R. (2026) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613261495469
Mugwaze, F. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1924351
Lee, H. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-72824-6_9
Privilegierte gruppenbasierte Ignoranz
Stern, J. T. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-72824-6_10
Racial pain, academic profit: Methodological reparations for race research under whiteness
Khan, F. (2026) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/00380385261477604
Bethinking ourselves anew: on mathematics socialization and contributory injustice, a reappraisal
Larnell, G. V. (2026) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1080/10986065.2026.2747805
Hänel, H. C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-72824-6_8
Krishnamoorthy, T. (2026) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2025-013532
Cultivating Pre-Service EFL Teachers' Social Justice
Kırmızı, Ö., Kızıldağ, A., & Keleş, U. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6945-7.ch002
Kyriakopoulos, G. (2026) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/00220272.2026.2746351
Information integrity and the justice of agri-food transitions
Kabir, K. H. (2026) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-026-10990-7
Delegitimated Sovereignties: Gang Governance and the Coloniality of Criminology
Camilien, N. (2026) · Critical Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10612-026-09921-z
Epistemic Injustice in Algorithmic Systems: A Frickerian Analysis of AI-Driven Knowledge Production
Charo, J., & Ondimu, K. (2026) · Machine Learning Research · doi:10.11648/j.mlr.20261102.15
Marta, R. (2026) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839.2026.2749840
When AI Helps Too Well: Transformative Inquiry and the Risk of Second-Order Drift in Ethics Research
Titz, I. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01209-y
“YOUR TEXT LOOKS LIKE FROM GPT”: AN ETHICAL STUDY OF AUTHORSHIP IN THE AGE OF LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS
Karnaukh, A. (2026) · Ezikov svât/Ezikov svât · doi:10.37708/ezs.swu.bg.v24i3.5
Infant bed-sharing in U.S. families: A systematic review of motivations and intervention adequacy
Covington, L. B., Nehru, B. J., Hauenstein, E. J., Ball, H. L., Tor, S., Katz, S. E., Jefferson, U. T., Johnson, B., Allen, E., Mayberry, S., et al. (2026) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2026.102392
L’écologie morale de la forêt usagère de La Teste-de-Buch (France)
Guérin-Turcq, A., & Lauret, R. (2026) · VertigO · doi:10.4000/17187
Racial hybridity and racial survival: navigating the ‘Third Space’ in Trevor Noah’s Born a Crime
Subban, P. (2026) · Critical African Studies · doi:10.1080/21681392.2026.2743251
Barata, A. M. F., & Brownill, S. (2026) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/1468-2427.70155
Illness, as a Theme in Phenomenology
Carel, H. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05936-9_267
Moderating Everyday Misogyny: Learning from Depp v Heard on Twitter
Nelson, L. (2026) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.268585
Sharma, P., Shekhani, S. S., & Thomas, S. C. (2026) · Asian Bioethics Review · doi:10.1007/s41649-026-00426-z
Skaremyr, E., Raivio, M., & Kuusisto, A. (2026) · British Journal of Religious Education · doi:10.1080/01416200.2026.2755048
Epistemic Agency, Critical Consciousness, and AI in the Neoliberal University
Aboderin, O. S., & Pietersen, D. (2026) · Education as Change · doi:10.25159/1947-9417/22078
Diversity and Inclusion in Rural Schools: An Integrative Literature Review
Abarzúa-Silva, L., Guerrero, P., & Bahamondes-Barahona, M. (2026) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131725.2026.2749607
Masculinidades e violência sexual
Mainieri, C. C., Miranda, I. D. F., & de Campos, C. H. (2026) · Revista Latino-Americana de Criminologia · doi:10.26512/2764-1619.2026.v6.n1.e61249
Valtonen, A., Stevanovic, M., Leinonen, M., Nevalainen, H., & Weiste, E. (2026) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.70342
Schalck, C. (2026) · Nouvelle revue de psychosociologie · doi:10.3917/nrp.042.0059
Kolbaş, A. E., Devisch, O., & Huybrechts, L. (2026) · Urban Planning · doi:10.17645/up.12591
Muralidhar, L. B., Jayalakshmi, N. A., Shilpa, R., Prabhu, U., & Radha, P. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0166-0.ch003
Communication in the Algorithmic City, by Joshua Cohen
Lazar, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.003.0007
Measurement, Meaning, and Justice: Stitching Paradigms Across a Century of Social Service Review
Samuels, G. M., & Benson, O. G. (2026) · Social Service Review · doi:10.1086/743611
Diverse Voices in Health Law and Ethics: Important Perspectives
Robertson‐Preidler, J. (2026) · International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics · doi:10.3138/ijfab-2026-0027
Just Governance and the Right to the Algorithmic City, by Renée Jorgensen
Lazar, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.003.0005
Cracking peace: divesting from the coloniality of peace through decolonial memory activism
Pauls, C. (2026) · Journal of Peace Education · doi:10.1080/17400201.2026.2754459
Panoptic Pain and Women’s Disciplinary Governance in the Persistent Pain Clinic
Davies, D., Ballantyne, A., & Nie, J. (2026) · International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics · doi:10.3138/ijfab-2025-0025
Comment on ‘The Algorithmic City’, by Arvind Narayanan
Lazar, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.003.0008
Rethinking Co-Working: Inclusive Innovation Beyond Startup Myths and Entrepreneurial Elitism
URHAN, C. (2026) · Kent Akademisi · doi:10.35674/kent.1843642
Prejudices are not like hinges
Raut, T. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05858-6
Reimagining International Development Through Ethical Leadership and Decolonial Pedagogy
Ebron, K. T. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-8212-8.ch018
Let the learner’s voice be heard! Empowering young refugees in Iraq
Duvekot, R., & Ali, S. O. (2026) · International Review of Education · doi:10.1007/s11159-025-10226-6
‘My body, used like a tool’: somatic education and the achievement body
Han, H., & Kim, D. (2026) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2026.2753134
Mpofu, N. (2026) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/13670069261496424
Heesen, J. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-69987-4_22-1
Embodied Resistance and Epistemic Sovereignty: Rethinking Knowledge Production in Disability Studies
Sepúlveda, C. A. B. (2026) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/jtsb.70071
Lazar, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.002.0006
The Global AI Compute Stack: A Systems Framework for Compute Nationalism and AI Governance
Nadimpalli, H., Alluru, K. V., Reddy, A., Rajesh, S., & Yajnik, A. (2026) · International Conference on Educational Technology, Language and Technical Communication (ETLTC) · doi:10.3390/engproc2026143088
Neves, A. C. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su182111030
Falbo, A. (2026) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2026.10162
Introduction: Artificial Intelligence and Platform Capitalism
Lazar, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.003.0001
Turowski, M. (2026) · Studia Polityczne · doi:10.35757/stp.2026.54.3.08
de Bie, L., Hiebert, M., Rodak, T., & Buchman, D. Z. (2026) · International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics · doi:10.3138/ijfab-2025-0013
Reply to Jorgensen, Fourcade, Cohen, and Narayanan
Lazar, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.003.0009
Sholeh, M. I. (2026) · Eduistiqomah in Philosophy · doi:10.71305/eip.v1i1.16
Dionne, J. F., Cortés, V., & Hausknecht, S. N. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-8212-8.ch005
Lazar, S. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.001.0001
Decolonizing science communication: Epistemic pluralism and the challenge of multicultural contexts
Frías-Villegas, G. (2026) · Cultures of Science · doi:10.1177/20966083261494742
Divided by Code: Pre-emption and Constitution in the ‘Algorithmic City’, by Marion Fourcade
Lazar, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.003.0006
van de Ven, K., Gimpel, C., Henwood, C., Dalton, H. E., Robinson, L. D., Santamaria, J., MacRae, H., & Lee, N. (2026) · Drugs Education Prevention and Policy · doi:10.1080/09687637.2026.2752493
Mehmood, W. (2026) · Journal of Social Sciences Research & Policy · doi:10.71327/jssrp.41.356.364
Beckett, A. E., Encarnação, P. M. M., & Smith, E. (2026) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2026.2756817
Structural Collateralism: Architecture, Function, and the Co-production of Harm
Vidotto, G. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01222-1
Swann, N., van Dael, J., Langstrup, H., Barry, E., Greenhalgh, T., & Papoutsi, C. (2026) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.70287
Toward Nurturing Productive Clinician-AI Disagreement in Medicine
Shussett, D., & Dubljević, V. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2741317
What can asymmetrical minds do? towards a bottom-up approach to philosophy of education in East Asia
Lee, K. Y. (2026) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2026.2754149
Injusticias históricas, obnubilación moral y captura teleológica
Marey, M. (2026) · Diánoia Revista de Filosofía · doi:10.22201/iifs.18704913e.2026.97.2244
The Right Not to Be Rewritten: Epistemic Mediation in Pediatric Asylum Evaluations
Tuohy, B., Telfer, A. N., Gong, O., Rossi, F., & Gorrie, R. E. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2740444
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
