The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,401–1,500 of 12,257
Timmis, S., Mgqwashu, E. M., Trahar, S., Naidoo, K., Lucas, L., & Muhuro, P. (2024) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2024.2359738 · Cited by 21
Language, translanguaging, and epistemic justice: Multilingual learning across the curriculum
Kerfoot, C. (2024) · South African Journal of Science · doi:10.17159/sajs.2024/18146 · Cited by 21
Applying co-production principles in research: Reflections from young people and academics
MacLachlan, A., Pemmasani, P., Jamieson-MacKenzie, I., McMellon, C., Cunningham, E., Lewis, R., & Tisdall, E. K. M. (2024) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/09075682241269692 · Cited by 21
Hysteria, Hermeneutical Injustice and Conceptual Engineering
Coliva, A. (2024) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2400089 · Cited by 21
Experts – Part I: What They Are and How to Identify Them
Croce, M., & Baghramian, M. (2024) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.13009 · Cited by 21
Participation of persons living with dementia in research: A means to address epistemic injustice
Halonen, U., Aaltonen, M. S., Aerschot, L. V., & Pirhonen, J. (2024) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/14713012241299015 · Cited by 21
Performing Democratic Listening
Celis, K., & Childs, S. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198934905.003.0007 · Cited by 21
Islam, coloniality, and the pedagogy of cognitive liberation in higher education
Lumbard, J. E. B. (2025) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2025.2468974 · Cited by 21
Clifton, S., Cooper, E., Bourke, J., Connor, S., Denton, S., Dominish, B., Gibellini, C., Gilroy, J., Hallahan, L., Jessep, S., et al. (2025) · Evidence & Policy · doi:10.1332/17442648y2025d000000060 · Cited by 21
Equity by design principles for digital health interventions
Bitomsky, L., Nißen, M., & Kowatsch, T. (2025) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-025-02645-6 · Cited by 21
Ahmed, S. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1720563 · Cited by 21
Testimony and the Constitutive Norm of Assertion
Johnson, C. R. (2015) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2015.1042006 · Cited by 21
Relational Equality and Disability Injustice
Brown, J. (2018) · Journal of Moral Philosophy · doi:10.1163/17455243-20180008 · Cited by 21
Indigenous Course Requirements: A Liberal-Democratic Justification
Tanchuk, N., Kruse, M., & McDonough, K. (2020) · Philosophical Inquiry in Education · doi:10.7202/1070738ar · Cited by 21
Parent, F., Aiguier, G., Berkesse, A., Reynaerts, M., Rolland, F., Wardavoir, H., Jouquan, J., & (SIFEM), A. N. D. M. D. R. T. «. É. D. C. E. S. ». D. L. S. I. F. D. M. (2018) · Pédagogie médicale · doi:10.1051/pmed/2019020 · Cited by 21
Epistemic injustice, face-to-face encounters and caring institutions
Bourgault, S. (2019) · International Journal of Care and Caring · doi:10.1332/239788219x15682725266696 · Cited by 21
The Coherence of Liberal Nationalism
Miller, D. E. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0002 · Cited by 22
Lochhead, J. (2020) · Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Musiktheorie [Journal of the German-Speaking Society of Music Theory] · doi:10.31751/1031 · Cited by 21
More than consent for ethical open-label placebo research
Sullivan, L. S. (2020) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105893 · Cited by 21
Toole, B. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192893338.003.0006 · Cited by 21
Understanding and investigating relationality in the capability approach
Owens, J., Entwistle, V. A., Craven, L. K., & Conradie, I. M. (2021) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/jtsb.12310 · Cited by 21
Towards a Democratic Theory of Silence
Gray, S. W. D. (2021) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00323217211043433 · Cited by 22
Foresight and responsible innovation: Openness and closure in anticipatory heuristics
López, S. U., Rodríguez, H., & Ibarra, A. (2021) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2021.102852 · Cited by 21
Bueter, A. (2021) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.12.002 · Cited by 21
The Epistemic Role of Outlaw Emotions
Silva, L. L. (2021) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.1160 · Cited by 21
Embracing queer heartache: lessons from LGBTQ+ intergenerational dialogues
Morris, K. A., Greteman, A. J., & Weststrate, N. M. (2022) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2022.2035459 · Cited by 24
Mental Health, Legal Capacity, and Human Rights
(2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108979016 · Cited by 21
Epistemic Responsibility in Business: An Integrative Framework for an Epistemic Ethics
Lamy, E. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05078-1 · Cited by 21
Rijken, M., Close, J., Menting, J., Lette, M., Stoop, A., Zonneveld, N., de Bruin, S. R., Lloyd, H. M., & Heijmans, M. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13454 · Cited by 21
Harris, O., Andrews, C., Broome, M. R., Kustner, C., & Jacobsen, P. C. (2022) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12368 · Cited by 24
BASES TEÓRICO-FILOSÓFICAS PARA O DESIGN DE EDUCAÇÃO INTERCULTURAL COMO DIÁLOGO DE SABERES
El-Hani, C. N. (2022) · Investigações em Ensino de Ciências · doi:10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2022v27n1p01 · Cited by 22
Communities and Climate Change: Why Practices and Practitioners Matter
Grix, M., & Watene, K. (2022) · Ethics & International Affairs · doi:10.1017/s089267942200020x · Cited by 21
A Program for Valuing Mental Health Lived Experience in Social Work Education
Mahboub, L., Martin, R., & Hodgson, D. (2022) · Australian Social Work · doi:10.1080/0312407x.2022.2101013 · Cited by 22
Youngman, T., Modrow, S., Smith, M. J., & Patin, B. J. H. (2022) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.759 · Cited by 21
Peer support in sub-Saharan Africa: A critical interpretive synthesis of school-based research
Mitchell, R. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Development · doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102686 · Cited by 22
Values and vendettas: Populist science governance in Mexico
Reyes-Galindo, L. I. (2022) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127221140020 · Cited by 21
Women of color and the hidden curriculum of school psychology doctoral programs
Sabnis, S. V., Tanaka, M. L., Beard, K., & Proctor, S. L. (2023) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2023.02.004 · Cited by 23
Naidu, T. (2023) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2023.2206535 · Cited by 21
Bergen, C., Bortolotti, L., Temple, R., Fadashe, C., Lee, C., Lim, M. C., & McCabe, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1197512 · Cited by 21
The core epistemic responsibilities of universities: Results from a Delphi study
Lechner, I. M., Mokkink, L. B., de Ridder, J., van Woudenberg, R., Bouter, L. M., & Tijdink, J. K. (2023) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2023.2255826 · Cited by 21
Philosophy, Bullshit, and Peer Review
Levy, N. L. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009256315 · Cited by 21
Epistemic Injustice in Deliberative Mini Publics
Schmidt, E. (2024) · Journal of Deliberative Democracy · doi:10.16997/jdd.1493 · Cited by 26
Legault, M., Catala, A., & Poirier, P. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04730-9 · Cited by 21
Wimpy Retributivism and the Promise of Moral Influence Theories
McKenna, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197679999.003.0013 · Cited by 21
Democratizing value alignment: from authoritarian to democratic AI ethics
Huang, L. T.-L., Papyshev, G., & Wong, J. K. L. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00624-1 · Cited by 34
Frega, R. (2013) · Critique · doi:10.3917/criti.799.0978 · Cited by 21
Sharing in or Benefiting from Scientific Advancement?
Timmermann, C. (2013) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9438-3 · Cited by 21
Thinking aboutEcological Thinking
Code, L. B. (2007) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01174.x · Cited by 21
Peter, E. H., Mohammed, S., & Simmonds, A. H. (2013) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733013502804 · Cited by 21
Carver, L., Morley, S., & Taylor, P. (2016) · Illness Crisis & Loss · doi:10.1177/1054137316675715 · Cited by 21
International Schools, Teaching and Governance
Blyth, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46783-2 · Cited by 21
The Loss of Autonomy in Abused Persons: Psychological, Moral, and Legal Dimensions
Ciurria, M. (2018) · Humanities · doi:10.3390/h7020048 · Cited by 21
O’Connell, S., Carthy, V. J. C. M., & Savage, E. (2019) · Chronic Illness · doi:10.1177/1742395319869443 · Cited by 21
Participatory action research: towards (non-ideal) epistemic justice in a university in South Africa
Walker, M., Martinez-Vargas, C., & Mkwananzi, F. (2019) · Journal of Global Ethics · doi:10.1080/17449626.2019.1661269 · Cited by 21
Études TransInterroger les conditions de production et de diffusion des savoirs
Espineira, K., & Thomas, M.-Y. (2019) · Genre sexualité & société · doi:10.4000/gss.5916 · Cited by 38
Head, N. (2020) · International Theory · doi:10.1017/s175297192000007x · Cited by 21
Feminine Power: A New Articulation
Barton, B., & Huebner, L. (2020) · Psychology and Sexuality · doi:10.1080/19419899.2020.1771408 · Cited by 26
Next-Generation Policing Research: Three Propositions
Bell, M. C. (2021) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.35.4.29 · Cited by 23
Groll, D. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190063054.001.0001 · Cited by 21
Posthuman Child and the Diffractive Teacher: Decolonizing the Nature/Culture Binary
Murris, K. (2018) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_7-2 · Cited by 21
Wright, H. R., & Høyen, M. (2020) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0203 · Cited by 25
Culpability for Epistemic Injustice: Deontic or Aretetic?
Riggs, W. D. (2012) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2011.652210 · Cited by 21
I—Hallvard Lillehammer: Moral Testimony, Moral Virtue, and the Value of Autonomy
Lillehammer, H. (2014) · Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8349.2014.00235.x · Cited by 21
Behavioral studies in sustainable supply chain management
Pournader, M., Sauer, P. C., Fahimnia, B., & Seuring, S. A. (2021) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108344 · Cited by 21
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Date Rape: The Intractability of Hermeneutical Injustice
Jackson, D. L. (2019) · Library of public policy and public administration · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05989-7_4 · Cited by 20
Cunliffe, Z. A. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19601-1_28 · Cited by 20
Reflection and synthesis: How moral agents learn and moral cultures evolve
BURCH-BROWN, J. M. (2021) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12622 · Cited by 20
Huetter‐Almerigi, Y. (2022) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2022.2155237 · Cited by 20
Pre-modern epistemes inspiring a new Global Sociology of Education Imagination
Collet‐Sabé, J. (2023) · British Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/01425692.2023.2195089 · Cited by 20
Epistemic injustice and colonisation
Tobi, A. (2022) · South African Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/02580136.2023.2199605 · Cited by 21
Keita, S. O. Y. (2023) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13903 · Cited by 20
An overview on trust and trustworthiness: individual and institutional dimensions
Lalumera, E. (2024) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2024.2301860 · Cited by 20
Racial gaslighting as affective injustice: a conceptual framework for education
Zembylas, M. (2024) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2024.2306680 · Cited by 20
Botho/Ubuntu paradigm as cognitive justice in psychology
Sefotho, M. M., & Letseka, M. (2024) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/01430343241244748 · Cited by 20
Carefully Unmaking the “Marginalized User”: A Diffractive Analysis of a Gay Online Community
Taylor, J., Deng, W. H., Holstein, K., Fox, S., & Zhu, H. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3673229 · Cited by 24
Daly, A., Ritunnano, R., Gallagher, S., Kirmayer, L. J., Dam, N. T. V., & Kleinman, J. J. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1390885 · Cited by 20
What’s in a name? Participants’ pseudonym choices as a practice of empowerment and epistemic justice
Pretorius, L., & Patel, S. V. (2024) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/1743727x.2024.2432271 · Cited by 20
Cummings, S., Munthali, N., & Sittoni, T. (2024) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3285 · Cited by 24
Decolonising urban knowledge(s): an ordinary imperative in extraordinary times
Ortiz, C., Travlou, P., Siqueira, M. T., & Testori, G. (2025) · City · doi:10.1080/13604813.2025.2470540 · Cited by 21
Fiske, A., Blacker, S., Geneviève, L. D., Willem, T., Fritzsche, M.-C., Buyx, A., Celi, L. A., & McLennan, S. (2025) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/j.landig.2025.01.003 · Cited by 21
Menopause apps: Personal health tracking, empowerment and epistemic injustice
Sillence, E., Osborne, A. K., Kemp, E., & McKellar, K. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251330782 · Cited by 20
Doubt and denial: epistemic responsibility meets climate change scepticism
Code, L. B. (2015) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781784711337.00008 · Cited by 20
Philosophy and Disability: What Should Philosophy Do?
Silvers, A. (2016) · Res Philosophica · doi:10.11612/resphil.1555 · Cited by 20
O’Donovan, Ó., & Madden, D. (2018) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-018-9869-2 · Cited by 20
Oppression, Forgiveness, and Ceasing to Blame
Brunning, L., & Milam, P. (2018) · Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy · doi:10.26556/jesp.v14i2.391 · Cited by 20
Multicultural Literacy, Epistemic Injustice, and White Ignorance
Catala, A. (2019) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7289 · Cited by 20
The Agent in Pain: Alienation and Discursive Abuse
Giladi, P. (2020) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2020.1784534 · Cited by 21
What Is Epistemic Entitlement?
Graham, P. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108666404.005 · Cited by 20
Echo Chambers and Audio Signal Processing
Elzinga, B. (2020) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2020.33 · Cited by 20
Communication about distress and well-being: Epistemic and ethical considerations
White, R. G., Fay, R. J., Chiumento, A., Giurgi-Oncu, C., & Phipps, A. M. (2022) · Transcultural Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/13634615221082795 · Cited by 20
Girl Talk: Understanding Negative Reactions to Female Vocal Fry
Chao, M., & Bursten, J. R. S. (2021) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2020.55 · Cited by 20
Medina, J., & Henning, T. M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198833659.003.0008 · Cited by 20
The need for adolescents’ agency in salutogenic approaches shaping physical activity in schools
Boonekamp, G., Jansen, E., O’Sullivan, T. L., Dierx, J. A. J., Lindström, B., Pérez-Wilson, P., & Díaz, C. Á.-D. (2021) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/daab073 · Cited by 24
Monypenny, A. (2021) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12554 · Cited by 20
Patients’ Access to Their Psychiatric Notes: Current Policies and Practices in Sweden
Bärkås, A., Scandurra, I., Rexhepi, H., Blease, C., Cajander, Å., & Hägglund, M. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18179140 · Cited by 20
Allen, A. (2021) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/00420980211044409 · Cited by 20
A systemic approach to the decolonisation of knowledge
Cummings, S., Munthali, N., & Shapland, P. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003112525-7 · Cited by 21
Making transdisciplinarity work
Ludwig, D., & Boogaard, B. K. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003112525-3 · Cited by 20
Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry
Gagné‐Julien, A. (2021) · European journal of analytic philosophy · doi:10.31820/ejap.17.3.3 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
