The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,601–1,700 of 12,257
Trust and Trust-Engineering in Artificial Intelligence Research: Theory and Praxis
Chen, M. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00465-4 · Cited by 22
How should we promote transient diversity in science?
Wu, J., & O’Connor, C. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04037-1 · Cited by 19
From relational equality to personal responsibility
Schmidt, A. T. (2021) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-021-01711-3 · Cited by 19
Murtagh, M. J., Machirori, M., Gaff, C., Blell, M. T., de Vries, J., Doerr, M. J., Dove, E. S., Duncanson, A., Ward, J. H., Hendricks‐Sturrup, R., et al. (2021) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17233.1 · Cited by 19
Lefkowitz, A., Vizza, J., & Kuper, A. (2022) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13672 · Cited by 20
Advancing a Data Justice Framework for Public Health Surveillance
Buchbinder, M. H., Juengst, E. T., Rennie, S., Blue, C. M., & Rosen, D. L. (2022) · AJOB Empirical Bioethics · doi:10.1080/23294515.2022.2063997 · Cited by 20
Reason Versus Power: Genealogy, Critique, and Epistemic Injustice
Lorenzini, D. (2022) · The Monist · doi:10.1093/monist/onac016 · Cited by 19
Timmis, S., Mgqwashu, E. M., Naidoo, K., Muhuro, P., Trahar, S., Lucas, L., Wisker, G., & de Wet, T. (2019) · Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning · doi:10.14426/cristal.v7isi.1896 · Cited by 19
van Wijngaarden, E. J., Leget, C. J. W., & Goossensen, A. (2016) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-016-9687-4 · Cited by 19
Embodied Harm: A Phenomenological Engagement with Stereotype Threat
Freeman, L. (2017) · Human Studies · doi:10.1007/s10746-017-9438-4 · Cited by 25
Epistemic Authority in Nursing Practice vs. Doctors’ Orders
Reed, P. G. (2016) · Nursing Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0894318416647356 · Cited by 19
What can we learn from patients’ perspectives on the quality and safety of hospital care?
Fitzsimons, B., & Cornwell, J. (2018) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008106 · Cited by 19
Beware the kudzu: Corporate creep, university consumers, and epistemic injustice
Staller, K. M. (2022) · Qualitative Social Work · doi:10.1177/14733250221106639 · Cited by 19
Postdigital Epistemic Violence
MacKenzie, A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35469-4_7-1 · Cited by 18
Hale, C., Lyus, J., Benstead, S., Ruddock, A., & Odell, E. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/xwjuh · Cited by 19
Conversational Artificial Intelligence and the Potential for Epistemic Injustice
De Proost, M., & Pozzi, G. (2023) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2191020 · Cited by 18
Moral responsibility for concepts
Fredericks, R. (2018) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.12376 · Cited by 18
Liberal Nationalism and Symbolic Religious Establishment
Laborde, C., & Lægaard, S. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0010 · Cited by 19
Pettit, P. N. (2020) · Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0031819120000170 · Cited by 18
MUSIC COMPOSITION AND EPISTEMIC INJUSTICE
Redhead, L. (2022) · Tempo · doi:10.1017/s0040298222000328 · Cited by 18
Collective Writing: The Continuous Struggle for Meaning-Making
Jandrić, P., Luke, T. W., Sturm, S., McLaren, P. L., Jackson, L., MacKenzie, A., Tesař, M., Stewart, G. T., Roberts, P. B., Abegglen, S., et al. (2023) · Postdigital science and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-31299-1_14 · Cited by 18
Equity and justice in urban coastal adaptation planning: new evaluation framework
Okamoto, T., & Doyon, A. (2024) · Buildings and Cities · doi:10.5334/bc.377 · Cited by 20
Carter, J. A. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780191982460.001.0001 · Cited by 18
What is conceptual engineering good for? The argument from nameability
Koch, S., & Lupyan, G. (2024) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.13110 · Cited by 18
Energy Justice as Epistemic Justice
Valkenburg, G. (2024) · Ethics Policy & Environment · doi:10.1080/21550085.2024.2418789 · Cited by 22
Gwagwa, A. E., & Mollema, W. J. T. (2024) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.101078 · Cited by 20
Decolonising social work practice field education: A scoping review
Jones, M., Anka, A., Segev, E., Alhuzail, N. A., Mohamed, O., Wallengren-Lynch, M., Cantley, L., Berg, N. M. V., Laver, S., Hammond, L., et al. (2025) · International Social Work · doi:10.1177/00208728241303596 · Cited by 18
Recovery-oriented psychiatry: oxymoron or catalyst for change?
Speyer, H., Roe, D., & Slade, M. (2025) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(25)00092-6 · Cited by 18
Storytelling as methodology: Intersecting multicultural voices to decolonise public relations
Hou, J. Z. (2025) · Public Relations Inquiry · doi:10.1177/2046147x251351363 · Cited by 18
Hyzen, A., den Bulck, H. V., Puppis, M., Kulig, M., & Paulussen, S. (2025) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtaf018 · Cited by 18
Sex in Medicine: What Stands in the Way of Credibility?
Mikkola, M. (2015) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-015-9350-3 · Cited by 18
Forget and Forgive: A Practical Approach to Forgotten Evidence
Dogramaci, S. (2015) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0002.026 · Cited by 18
Straight Thinking in Warped Environments
Begby, E. (2018) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/any039 · Cited by 18
Publication and Citation Patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A National Perspective
Pajić, D., Jevremov, T., & Škorić, M. (2019) · The Canadian Journal of Sociology · doi:10.29173/cjs29214 · Cited by 18
Rorty on Hermeneutical Injustice, Liberal Redescription and Utopian Imagination
Penelas, F. (2019) · ENDOXA · doi:10.5944/endoxa.43.2019.19231 · Cited by 18
Epistemic Emotions and the Value of Truth
Candiotto, L. (2019) · Acta Analytica · doi:10.1007/s12136-019-00416-x · Cited by 18
Racial Conflation: Agency, Black Action, and Criminal Intent
Bierria, A. (2020) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12371 · Cited by 19
From Nature of Science to Social Justice: The Political Power of Epistemic Lessons
Allchin, D. (2020) · Science: Philosophy, History and Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47260-3_2 · Cited by 18
Epistemic Injustice and Collective Wrongdoing: Introduction to Special Issue
Altanian, M., & Kassar, N. E. (2020) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2020.1843199 · Cited by 18
Against moral judgment. The empirical case for moral abolitionism
Sauer, H. (2021) · Philosophical Explorations · doi:10.1080/13869795.2021.1908580 · Cited by 19
Dunlop, B. J., Hunter, C., Shafti, M., Coleman, S. E., Hartley, S., & Taylor, P. J. (2021) · Psychology and Sexuality · doi:10.1080/19419899.2021.1924241 · Cited by 20
Testini, F. (2021) · Res Publica · doi:10.1007/s11158-021-09515-2 · Cited by 18
Plester, B. A., Kim, H., Sayers, J. G., & Carroll, B. J. (2021) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.12769 · Cited by 18
Just How Testimonial, Epistemic, Or Correctable Is Testimonial Injustice?
Auerback, R. (2021) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2021.1997394 · Cited by 18
Appropriately framing maternal request caesarean section
Romanis, E. C. (2022) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2021-107806 · Cited by 18
Reyes, A. A. M. (2022) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08926 · Cited by 18
Martínez, G. A., Showstack, R. E., Magaña, D., Sawan, P. T. D., & Hardin, K. J. (2021) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amab060 · Cited by 18
Moments of fun: Narratives of children’s experiences of music therapy in mental health care
Klyve, G. P., & Rolvsjord, R. (2022) · Nordic Journal of Music Therapy · doi:10.1080/08098131.2022.2055114 · Cited by 18
Delgado-Baena, A., Serrano, L., Vela-Jiménez, R., López-Montero, R., & Sianes, A. (2022) · Action Research · doi:10.1177/14767503221126531 · Cited by 18
The experiences of non-religious children in religious education
Strhan, A., & Shillitoe, R. (2022) · Journal of Religious Education · doi:10.1007/s40839-022-00180-y · Cited by 18
Decentring the discoverer: how AI helps us rethink scientific discovery
Clark, E., & Khosrowi, D. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03902-9 · Cited by 18
A Critical Theory of Global Justice
Ibsen, M. F. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192864123.001.0001 · Cited by 19
Yap, A., & Ichikawa, J. J. (2023) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2022.43 · Cited by 18
Why Epistemic Decolonisation in Africa?
Mitova, V. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2184218 · Cited by 18
The harms of unattainable pedagogical exemplars on social media
Kotsonis, A., & Dunne, G. (2023) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2023.2225763 · Cited by 20
Karmakar, G., & Chetty, R. (2023) · eTropic electronic journal of studies in the tropics · doi:10.25120/etropic.22.2.2023.3970 · Cited by 18
Gendered and Racialised Epistemological Injustice in FGM-safeguarding
Carver, N., Karlsen, S., Mogilnicka, M., & Pantazis, C. (2023) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639231189813 · Cited by 18
Uneven mobilities and epistemic injustice: towards reflexive mobilities research
Lindberg, M. R., Kristensen, N. G., Freudendal-Pedersen, M., & Hartmann-Petersen, K. (2023) · Mobilities · doi:10.1080/17450101.2023.2244682 · Cited by 18
Paulson, J., & Tikly, L. P. (2023) · Comparative Education Review · doi:10.1086/726372 · Cited by 21
Epistemic injustice in education: exploring structural approaches, envisioning structural remedies
Nikolaidis, A. C. (2023) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhad074 · Cited by 18
Navigating Ethical Complexities Through Epistemological Analysis of ChatGPT
Chavanayarn, S. (2023) · Bulletin of Science Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/02704676231216355 · Cited by 18
Percival, C. S., Maggio, L. A., Wyatt, T. R., & Martin, P. C. (2023) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.15295 · Cited by 18
Treufeldt, H., & Burton, C. D. (2024) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108198 · Cited by 18
Mitigating Epistemic Injustice: The Online Construction of a Bisexual Culture
Taylor, J., & Bruckman, A. S. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3648614 · Cited by 20
Freeman, L., & Stewart, H. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197652480.001.0001 · Cited by 18
Joseph, J. (2024) · Journal of Sport and Social Issues · doi:10.1177/01937235241254116 · Cited by 19
Harmonizing smart city tech and anthropocentrism for climate resilience and Nature's benefit
Sikandar, S. M., Ali, S. M., & Hassan, Z. (2024) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101026 · Cited by 18
Hermeneutical Injustice and the Social Sciences: Development Policy and Positional Objectivity
McCollum, J. C. (2012) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2011.652212 · Cited by 18
Misrecognition, Misrecognition, and Fallibility
Laitinen, A. (2012) · Res Publica · doi:10.1007/s11158-012-9183-5 · Cited by 18
“Why Am I the Way I Am?” Narrative Work in the Context of Stigmatized Identities
Rance, J., Gray, R. M., & Hopwood, M. (2017) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732317728915 · Cited by 18
Justifying the Jury: Reconciling Justice, Equality, and Democracy
Schwartzberg, M. (2018) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055417000661 · Cited by 18
Power, Situation, and Character: A Confucian-Inspired Response to Indirect Situationist Critiques
Robertson, S. (2018) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-018-9884-8 · Cited by 18
Lindsey, J. (2018) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/0964663918793169 · Cited by 18
What Is a Sexist Ideology? Or: Why Grace Didn’t Leave
Hänel, H. C. (2018) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.034 · Cited by 20
Using vulnerability as a decolonial catalyst to re-cast the teacher as human(e)
Behari-Leak, K., Josephy, S., Potts, M.-A., Muresherwa, G., Corbishley, J., Petersen, T.-A., & Gove, B. (2019) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1661376 · Cited by 18
Epistemic modalities of racialised knowledge production in the Swedish academy
Thapar‐Björkert, S., & Farahani, F. (2019) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2019.1649440 · Cited by 22
Using photovoice to reflect on poverty and address social inequalities among primary care teams
Loignon, C., Dupéré, S., Bush, P. L., Truchon, K., Boyer, S., & Hudon, C. (2020) · Action Research · doi:10.1177/1476750320905900 · Cited by 18
‘The body says it’: the difficulty of measuring and communicating sensations of breathlessness
Malpass, A., McGuire, C. A., & Macnaughton, J. (2021) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2019-011816 · Cited by 18
On recovery: re-directing the concept by differentiation of its meanings
Friedman, Y. (2021) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-021-10014-7 · Cited by 18
Fay, R. J., Andrews, J., Huang, Z. M., & White, R. G. (2021) · Journal of Praxis in Higher Education · doi:10.47989/kpdc109 · Cited by 18
Alvarez, A., Teeters, L. P., Penuel, W., & Esteban-Guitart, M. (2023) · Learning, Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100718 · Cited by 15
Ethics and Research Methodologies for the Study of Traditional Forest-Related Knowledge
Gamborg, C., Parsons, R., Puri, R. K., & Sandøe, P. (2011) · World forests · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2144-9_14 · Cited by 18
Liberatory Epistemology and the Sharing of Knowledge: Querying the Norms
Grasswick, H. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_12 · Cited by 18
Socialising Epistemic Cognition
Knight, S., & Littleton, K. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.02.003 · Cited by 21
Science, emancipation and the variety of forms of knowledge
LACEY, H. M. (2014) · Metascience · doi:10.1007/s11016-014-9948-x · Cited by 18
Broncano‐Berrocal, F., & Encabo, J. V. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02233-6 · Cited by 18
Redescribing Final Vocabularies
Santelli, M. (2020) · European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy · doi:10.4000/ejpap.1887 · Cited by 17
Political self-deception and epistemic vice
Manson, N. C. (2020) · Ethics & Global Politics · doi:10.1080/16544951.2020.1853921 · Cited by 17
Unease as a Feminist-Pragmatist Concept
Wille, K. (2020) · European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy · doi:10.4000/ejpap.2103 · Cited by 17
An experiential account of a large-scale interdisciplinary data analysis of public engagement
Goñi, J., Fuentes, C. A., & Raveau, M. P. (2022) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01457-4 · Cited by 17
Caring for Whom? Racial Practices of Care and Liberal Constructivism
Bhandary, A. L. (2022) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies7040078 · Cited by 17
Maher, A. J., & Haegele, J. A. (2024) · British Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/01425692.2024.2334272 · Cited by 17
Lawther, C. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780191938634.001.0001 · Cited by 19
Berg, M. (2025) · Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l integration et de la migration internationale · doi:10.1007/s12134-025-01238-0 · Cited by 17
Engineering self-efficacy development in undergraduates: evolving sources
Power, J., Tanner, D. A., Egan, V. M., Simmie, G. M., & Buckley, J. (2025) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2025.2468350 · Cited by 18
Jäger, C. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190949945.013.4 · Cited by 17
Critical Leadership and Music Educational Practice
Schmidt, P. (2012) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2012.690313 · Cited by 17
"Analytic Social Epistemology" and the Epistemic Significance of Other Minds
Goldberg, S. C. (2013) · Social epistemology review and reply collective · Cited by 17
On not making up one’s own mind
McMyler, B. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1563-0 · Cited by 17
An Epistemological Critique of the African University Education System
Gwaravanda, E. T. (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.85879 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
