The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,101–2,200 of 12,257
Lost and changed meaning in life of people with Long Covid: a qualitative study
Lieberwerth, M., & Niemeijer, A. R. (2023) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1080/17482631.2023.2289668 · Cited by 13
On the epistemic urgency of decolonizing the school curriculum: a reflection
Akbar, A. (2023) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhad081 · Cited by 13
Dong, J., & Han, Y. (2023) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2023.2292129 · Cited by 13
Derby, L. (2024) · New West Indian Guide / Nieuwe West-Indische Gids · doi:10.1163/22134360-bja10029 · Cited by 13
“That’s just Future Medicine” - a qualitative study on users’ experiences of symptom checker apps
Müller, R., Klemmt, M., Koch, R., Ehni, H., Henking, T., Langmann, E., Wiesing, U., & Ranisch, R. (2024) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-024-01011-5 · Cited by 13
On prediction-modelers and decision-makers: why fairness requires more than a fair prediction model
Scantamburlo, T., Baumann, J., & Heitz, C. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-01886-3 · Cited by 18
Letters from Queer Elders: Transmitting Intergenerational Wisdom in LGBTQ+ Communities
McLean, K. C., Moriarty, N., Starling, K., & Weststrate, N. M. (2024) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2024.2326482 · Cited by 13
Polarization and the Democratic System: Kinds, Reasons, and Sites
Rostbøll, C. F. (2024) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592724000525 · Cited by 15
Dineen, K., & Goff, L. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2340641 · Cited by 13
Opportunities for incorporating intersectionality into biomedical informatics
Walk, O. J. B. D., Paullada, A., Everhart, A. R., Casanova-Pérez, R., Cohen, T., & Veinot, T. C. (2024) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104653 · Cited by 15
Rethinking Health Recommender Systems for Active Aging: An Autonomy-Based Ethical Analysis
Tiribelli, S., & Calvaresi, D. (2024) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-024-00479-z · Cited by 14
Roennfeldt, H., Hamilton, B. E., Hill, N., Castles, C., Glover, H., Byrne, L., & Roper, C. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.14122 · Cited by 13
Enhancing the transformative potential of interventions for the sustainable use of natural resources
Loos, J., Capano, G. C., Riechers, M., Walsh, C., & Leventon, J. (2024) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110691 · Cited by 13
Mitchell, D. (2024) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2024.2366897 · Cited by 15
The slow violence of climate security
O’Lear, S. (2024) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104078 · Cited by 13
Virtual diversity: Resolving the tension between the wider culture and the institution of science
Collins, H. M., Evans, R., & Reyes-Galindo, L. I. (2024) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127241263609 · Cited by 13
Zhu, Y., Shen, Y., & Yang, R. (2024) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-024-01297-9 · Cited by 13
Crossing the frontier from oral to written translanguaging for epistemic access in natural science
Abdulatief, S., & Guzula, X. (2024) · Reading & Writing · doi:10.4102/rw.v15i1.507 · Cited by 13
Pearson, A., Rose, K., Mitchell, A. J., Joseph, W., Douglas, S., Sedgewick, F., & Botha, M. (2024) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1089/aut.2024.0145 · Cited by 13
Commemoration and Constriction
Lim, C. (2024) · The Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10892-024-09503-7 · Cited by 13
Epistemic injustices and curriculum: Strategizing for justice
Babu, Y. S., Mishra, P., Kumar, A., Pandey, C. S., & Pandey, S. (2024) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101220 · Cited by 13
False consciousness, hermeneutical injustice, and ideological power
Stahl, T. (2024) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537241308133 · Cited by 13
Endometriosis in later life: an intersectional analysis from the perspective of epistemic injustice
Langmann, E., Kainradl, A.-C., Weßel, M., & Rokvity, A. (2024) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-024-10245-4 · Cited by 13
The use of large language models as scaffolds for proleptic reasoning
Kudina, O., Ballsun-Stanton, B., & Alfano, M. (2025) · Asian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s44204-025-00247-1 · Cited by 13
Pasternak, A. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197556719.001.0001 · Cited by 13
The need for epistemic humility in AI-assisted pain assessment
Katz, R. A., Graham, S. S., & Buchman, D. Z. (2025) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-025-10264-9 · Cited by 13
Ortega‐Martin, E., & Álvarez‐Gálvez, J. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70290 · Cited by 13
Constructed objectivity in asylum decision-making through new technologies
Özkul, D. (2025) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2025.2513161 · Cited by 13
Improving visibility for knowledge holders in ethnobiological and ethnopharmacological publications
Teixidor‐Toneu, I., Odonne, G., Leonti, M., Hudson, M. L., Jordan, F. M., Mattalia, G., Pankararu, C. G. J., Silva, M. T., Silva, L., Ulian, T., et al. (2025) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2025.120632 · Cited by 13
Akpinar, N.-J., & Fazelpour, S. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05293-z · Cited by 13
Critical Heritage and Participatory Discourse in the UAE
Rizvi, U. Z. (2018) · Design and Culture · doi:10.1080/17547075.2018.1431861 · Cited by 13
Women’s Lived Experience of Embodied Disenfranchised Grief: Loss, Betrayal, and the Double Jeopardy
Garrod, T., & Pascal, J. (2018) · Illness Crisis & Loss · doi:10.1177/1054137318780582 · Cited by 13
Just Say ‘No’: Obligations to Voice Disagreement
Johnson, C. R. (2018) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246118000577 · Cited by 13
Doing Knowing Ethically – Where Social Work Values Meet Critical Realism
Dore, I. (2019) · Ethics and Social Welfare · doi:10.1080/17496535.2019.1598458 · Cited by 13
“Prediscursive Epistemic Injury”: Recognizing Another Form of Epistemic Injustice?
Lobb, A. (2018) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6232 · Cited by 13
Epistemic Injustice in Finance
de Bruin, B. (2019) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-019-09677-y · Cited by 13
Anderson, E. (2020) · The Southern Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/sjp.12351 · Cited by 13
Pang, B. (2020) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2020.1762178 · Cited by 13
Critical Theory, Social Critique and Knowledge
Renault, E. (2020) · Critical Horizons · doi:10.1080/14409917.2020.1790750 · Cited by 18
Beyond new public management: Empowering community‐based organisations
Mailloux, D., & Lacharité, C. (2020) · Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcop.22435 · Cited by 13
Novel & worthy: creativity as a thick epistemic concept
Sánchez-Dorado, J. (2020) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-020-00303-y · Cited by 13
Birch, R. (2020) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12484 · Cited by 13
Walker, M., & Mathebula, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56197-0_8 · Cited by 13
Testimonial Smothering and Domestic Violence Disclosure in Clinical Contexts
Warman, J. (2021) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2021.3 · Cited by 15
Developing an ethical rationale for collaborative approaches to evaluation
Chouinard, J. A., & Cousins, J. B. (2021) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1356389020978501 · Cited by 13
Hidden Costs of Inquiry: Exploitation, World-Travelling and Marginalized Lives
Yap, A. (2021) · Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal · doi:10.1353/ken.2021.0010 · Cited by 13
Silverman, M., & Baril, A. (2021) · Journal of Aging Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100956 · Cited by 14
“The revolution will not be supervised”: Consent and open secrets in data science
Carrigan, C. M., Green, M. W., & Rahman-Davies, A. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211035673 · Cited by 17
Re-envisioning Psychology: A Critical History of Psychology in India
Mishra, A. K., & Padalia, D. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4705-5_10 · Cited by 13
The Totalising Nature of Secure and Forensic Mental Health Services in England and Wales
Markham, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.789089 · Cited by 13
Kaya, A., & Benevento, A. (2021) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2021.2004096 · Cited by 13
Surviving academic Whiteness: Perspectives from the Pacific
Stewart, G. T., MacDonald, L., Matapo, J., Fa‘avae, D. T. M., Watson, B. K., Akiu, R. K., Martin, B., Mika, C., & Sturm, S. (2021) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2021.2010542 · Cited by 13
Marginalised Youth Activism: Peer-Engaged Research and Epistemic Justice
Kosko, S. J., Dastin, A., Merrill, M., & Sheth, R. (2021) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2021.2019691 · Cited by 13
Epistemic Emotions and Co-inquiry: A Situated Approach
Candiotto, L. (2022) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-021-09789-4 · Cited by 14
Josefsson, K. A., Haarr, K. H., Eriksen, S. S., & Børhaug, F. B. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.851783 · Cited by 13
The embodiment of childhood abuse and anorexia nervosa: A body mapping study
Malecki, J., Rhodes, P., Ussher, J. M., & Boydell, K. (2022) · Health Care For Women International · doi:10.1080/07399332.2022.2087074 · Cited by 13
How Policy Appetites Shape, and Are Shaped by Evidence Production and Use
Oliver, K. A. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98985-9_5 · Cited by 13
On the Epistemological Relevance of Social Power and Justice in Mathematics
Hunsicker, E., & Rittberg, C. J. (2022) · Axiomathes · doi:10.1007/s10516-022-09629-z · Cited by 13
Integrating autistic perspectives into autism science: A role for autistic autobiographies
Dinishak, J., & Akhtar, N. (2022) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613221123731 · Cited by 13
The Adultification of Black Girls as Identity-Prejudicial Credibility Excess
Carpan, C. (2022) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-022-10324-6 · Cited by 13
Reflections on addressing antisemitism in a Canadian faculty of medicine
Kuper, A. (2022) · Canadian Medical Education Journal · doi:10.36834/cmej.76086 · Cited by 16
Lorimer, K., Greco, G., & Lorgelly, P. K. (2022) · Culture Health & Sexuality · doi:10.1080/13691058.2022.2158236 · Cited by 13
A tale of two disciplines? Philosophy in/on translation
Leal, A., & Wilson, P. (2023) · Perspectives · doi:10.1080/0907676x.2023.2148984 · Cited by 13
Connecting social work research with policy and practice: issues of people, power and politics
Julkunen, I., Mauri, D., Ruch, G., & Isokuortti, N. (2023) · European Social Work Research · doi:10.1332/cikv6449 · Cited by 13
De la ignorancia del derecho a la injusticia epistémica en el derecho
Añón, C. L. (2023) · Oñati Socio-legal Series · doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1377 · Cited by 14
Weaver, M. J. T., Cockburn, J. J., Mtati, N., & Palmer, C. G. (2023) · Ecosystems and People · doi:10.1080/26395916.2023.2278307 · Cited by 13
Thinking about Women, Violence, and Agency
Gentry, C. E. (2012) · International Feminist Journal of Politics · doi:10.1080/14616742.2011.631420 · Cited by 13
Congdon, M. (2015) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/0191453715580158 · Cited by 13
QUESTIONS OF CANON FORMATION IN PHILOSOPHY: THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY IN AFRICA
Graneß, A. (2018) · Phronimon · doi:10.25159/2413-3086/3819 · Cited by 13
Identity and schizophrenia: Who do I want to be?
Seeman, M. V. (2017) · World Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.5498/wjp.v7.i1.1 · Cited by 13
Disagreement from the Religious Margins
Dormandy, K. (2018) · Res Philosophica · doi:10.11612/resphil.1686 · Cited by 13
Current Challenges of North/South Relations in Gay-Lesbian and Queer Studies
Pérez, M., & Radi, B. (2019) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2019.1582218 · Cited by 13
Epistemic Injustice and Self-Injury: A Concept with Clinical Implications
Sullivan, P. (2019) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.2019.0049 · Cited by 14
A Virtuous Hearer: An Exploration of Epistemic Injustice and an Ethic of Care in Public Encounters
Hand, L. C. (2019) · Administrative Theory & Praxis · doi:10.1080/10841806.2019.1700457 · Cited by 13
Harrison, N., Stanton, S., Manning, R., & Penetito, W. (2020) · Pedagogy Culture and Society · doi:10.1080/14681366.2020.1845786 · Cited by 13
Céfaï, D., Boukir, K., Malfilatre, M. G., & Véniat, C. (2019) · Sociologie et sociétés · doi:10.7202/1074729ar · Cited by 13
Masculine Embodiment Among Sexual Minorities in a Women’s Prison
Smoyer, A. B., Divita, D., & Perrault, A. (2021) · Australian Social Work · doi:10.1080/0312407x.2020.1850818 · Cited by 15
Read, H. (2021) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-021-10178-4 · Cited by 13
Rose, D. (2021) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16711.1 · Cited by 13
The Transformative Power of Language
(2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108671088 · Cited by 13
Tian, Y., & Breheny, R. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.29 · Cited by 13
Catching the WAVE: The Weight-Adjusting Account of Values and Evidence
Miller, B. (2014) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.02.007 · Cited by 13
Ndofirepi, A. P., & Cross, M. J. (2017) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-842-6_4 · Cited by 13
Theorising participation in urban regeneration partnerships: an adult education perspective
Galvin, M., & Simmie, G. M. (2017) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1320731 · Cited by 13
The Unlevel Knowing Field: An Engagement with Kristie Dotson's Third-Order Epistemic Oppression
Bailey, A. (2014) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 13
Carter, J. A. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191982460.003.0009 · Cited by 13
Reply to Guy Kahane and Julian Savulescu
Barnes, E. (2016) · Res Philosophica · doi:10.11612/resphil.2016.93.1.15 · Cited by 13
Place, Rural Education and Social Justice: A Study of Rural Teaching and Curriculum Politics
Roberts, P. (2016) · Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO) · Cited by 13
From Economic Crime to Corporate Violence
Forti, G., & Visconti, A. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118775004.ch5 · Cited by 13
Coady, D. (2021) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2021.1917364 · Cited by 13
Introduction to the special issue “Climate and marine justice – debates and critical perspectives”
Bercht, A. L., Hein, J., & Klepp, S. (2021) · Geographica Helvetica · doi:10.5194/gh-76-305-2021 · Cited by 13
The Democratisation Myth: Open Access and the Solidification of Epistemic InjusticesPreprint
Knöchelmann, M. (2020) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/hw7at · Cited by 17
MacKenzie, A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35469-4_9-1 · Cited by 13
Empowering Workers in an Age of Automation
Parr, T. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780192589002.001.0001 · Cited by 12
Craddock, E. (2025) · Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/13634593251336163 · Cited by 16
Testimonies of violence: Rigoberta Menchú and collective experiences of violence in Guatemala
Hartviksen, J. (2025) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2025.2496391 · Cited by 13
Bartoli, I. (2025) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.70005 · Cited by 12
Epistemic trust in generative AI for higher education scale (ETGAI-HE scale)
Pandey, C. S., Mishra, P., Pandey, S., & Pandey, S. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02566-6 · Cited by 12
Maitra, I., & McGowan, M. K. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780190929053.001.0001 · Cited by 12
Chance, E. A., Théophile, P., & Loe, L. R. (2025) · BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies · doi:10.1186/s12906-025-05133-0 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
