The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,201–2,300 of 12,257
Liougas, M. P., Grigorovich, A., Bianchi, A., Haslam‐Larmer, L., Shum, L. C., Iaboni, A., & McMurray, J. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2637089 · Cited by 12
A Cry for Care But not Justice: Embodied Vulnerabilities and the Moral Economy of Child Welfare
Knezevic, Z. (2019) · Affilia · doi:10.1177/0886109919878272 · Cited by 12
What it means to respect individuality
Liu, X., & Liang, Y. (2020) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-020-01563-3 · Cited by 12
Debate: Anger, Fitting Attitudes, and Srinivasan’s Category of “Affective Injustice”*
Plunkett, D. (2020) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/jopp.12241 · Cited by 12
Love and Growth: On One Aspect of James Baldwin's Significance for Education
Frank, J. (2015) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811511700906 · Cited by 12
Telling and the reasons of testimony*
Goldberg, S. C. (2021) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12775 · Cited by 12
Overempowered? Diversity-Focused Research with Gender/Sex and Sexual Majorities
van Anders, S. M., Schudson, Z. C., Beischel, W. J., Abed, E. C., Gormezano, A. M., & Dibble, E. R. (2021) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/10892680211034461 · Cited by 15
Voparil, C. J. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197605721.001.0001 · Cited by 12
Small-Scale Fisheries in the Blue Economy
Jentoft, S. (2022) · MARE publication series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89624-9_1 · Cited by 12
Responding to Sanist Microaggressions with Acts of Epistemic Resistance
Gosselin, A. (2022) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2022.9 · Cited by 12
George, B. R., & Goguen, S. (2021) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2021.4.13518 · Cited by 16
Goldstein, D., & Kennedy, E. B. (2022) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf22020 · Cited by 12
A capabilitarian approach to decolonising curriculum
Walker, M. (2022) · Education Citizenship and Social Justice · doi:10.1177/17461979221123011 · Cited by 12
Telic power and its applications
Burman, Å. (2022) · Journal of Political Power · doi:10.1080/2158379x.2022.2138192 · Cited by 12
Hung, P. S.-P., Byeon, A. G., Noorani, A., Walker, M. R., Lorello, G. R., & Hodaie, M. (2022) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2022.11.jns221191 · Cited by 12
Hermeneutic Awareness in Uncertain Times
Meretoja, H. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197571026.003.0004 · Cited by 12
Smith, S. M., Kheri, A., Ariyo, K., Gilbert, S., Salla, A., Lingiah, T., Taylor, C. J., & Edge, D. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1053502 · Cited by 15
Curiosity and zetetic style in ADHD
Steglich‐Petersen, A., & Varga, S. (2023) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2023.2227217 · Cited by 12
Golightley, S. (2023) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcad049 · Cited by 12
Towards a Clear and Fair Conceptualization of Empathy
Bollen, C. J. M. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2227963 · Cited by 16
Port developments and marine democracy in Latin America
Anbleyth‐Evans, J. (2023) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105767 · Cited by 12
Identifying key dimensions of indigenous led child welfare services: A qualitative literature review
Paki, N. P., King, P. T., Lewis, L., Walker, S., Mackay, H. T. U., Anderson, D., Amante, E., & Kemp, S. P. (2023) · Child & Family Social Work · doi:10.1111/cfs.13100 · Cited by 12
Religious Identity and Epistemic Injustice: An Intersectional Account
Rekis, J. (2023) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2023.86 · Cited by 12
When I say … epistemic injustice
Percival, C. S., Martin, P. C., Maggio, L. A., & Wyatt, T. R. (2024) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.15300 · Cited by 12
Caniglia, G., & Federica Russo, B. (2024) · History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40656-023-00603-5 · Cited by 12
Equitable Evaluation: Voices from the Global South
Murgatroyd, A., Dlakavu, A., Morkel, C., Feront, C., Jason, D., Goldman, I., Norins, J., Africa, M., Moshia-Molebatsi, K., Amisi, M., et al. (2023) · Evaluation: African perspectives. · doi:10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459 · Cited by 12
van den Breemer, R., Steigen, G. A., Lyngar, C. T., & Lid, I. M. (2024) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069241236181 · Cited by 7
Lenton, E., Kagan, D., Seear, K., Mulcahy, S., Farrugia, A., valentine, K., Edwards, M., & Jeffcote, D. (2024) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13776 · Cited by 12
Foundations of experiential knowledge: recovering a forgotten resource for social work
Wilken, J. P., & Cabiati, E. (2024) · European Social Work Research · doi:10.1332/27551768y2024d000000022 · Cited by 14
Is it even worth it? The ethics of researching armed groups in ‘the field’
Ibrahimi, N., & Malejacq, R. (2024) · Conflict Security and Development · doi:10.1080/14678802.2024.2405613 · Cited by 12
McHugh, S., Louch, G., Ludwin, K., Sheard, L., & O'Hara, J. K. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11626-4 · Cited by 12
Thomas, A., Archer, A., & Engelen, B. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197781722.003.0004 · Cited by 12
Autonomy, Violence, and Consent in the Obstetric Field
Sánchez, A. R. (2024) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2024.84 · Cited by 13
“Don't push!” experiences of obstetric violence in U.S. hospital settings
Church, A. C. (2024) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117497 · Cited by 12
Galloway, E. P., & Uccelli, P. (2024) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/j.linged.2024.101358 · Cited by 12
Atias, O., Shavit, A., Kali, Y., & Baram‐Tsabari, A. (2024) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.22006 · Cited by 12
Panchuk, M. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009269643 · Cited by 12
Decoloniality and Information Systems: Making Local Contexts Relevant to IS Research
Chughtai, H., & Young, A. (2024) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12579 · Cited by 12
Nowaskie, D. Z., Blackwood, D., & García, F. (2025) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1488888 · Cited by 12
From laboratory to life: Integrating diverse ways of knowing in mental health science
Downs, J. L. (2025) · Brain and Neuroscience Advances · doi:10.1177/23982128251327709 · Cited by 12
Universities and Climate Action
McCowan, T. (2025) · UCL Press eBooks · doi:10.14324/111.9781800088290 · Cited by 12
Is there a tension between AI safety and AI welfare?
Long, R., Sebo, J., & Sims, T. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02302-2 · Cited by 14
Religion: Peace through Non-Violence in Four Religious Traditions
Gentry, C. E. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-40761-0_13 · Cited by 12
Testimony, epistemic egoism, and epistemic credit
Kawall, J. (2019) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.12447 · Cited by 12
II—What Should ‘Impostor Syndrome’ Be?
Paul, S. K. (2019) · Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume · doi:10.1093/arisup/akz006 · Cited by 12
Here/There/Everywhere: Quantum Models for Decolonizing Canadian State Onto-Epistemology
Bowman, N. (2019) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-019-09610-x · Cited by 12
Negative expertise in conditions of manufactured ignorance: epistemic strategies, virtues and skills
Parviainen, J., & Lahikainen, L. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02315-5 · Cited by 12
Learning from the ‘right’ ground of mindfulness: some insights for the ‘good’ interculturalist
Huang, Z. M. (2019) · Language and Intercultural Communication · doi:10.1080/14708477.2019.1672711 · Cited by 12
Hall, T., Kakuma, R., Palmer, L. R., Minas, H., Martins, J. S., & Armstrong, G. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02521-3 · Cited by 12
Isham, L., Bradbury‐Jones, C., & Hewison, A. (2020) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcaa129 · Cited by 12
Deconstruction and Epistemic Violence
Schryver, C. D. (2021) · The Southern Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/sjp.12412 · Cited by 12
Barnes-Harris, M., Daniel, S. M., Venkateswaran, C., Hutchinson, A., & Johnson, M. J. (2021) · Indian Journal of Palliative Care · doi:10.4103/ijpc.ijpc_139_20 · Cited by 12
Miller, J. P. (2021) · Critical African Studies · doi:10.1080/21681392.2021.1884106 · Cited by 12
Non-Denominational Spiritual Care Givers and the Development of their Spirituality
ten Napel-Roos, N., Mathijssen, B., Smeets, W., & Zock, H. (2021) · Health and Social Care Chaplaincy · doi:10.1558/hscc.40706 · Cited by 12
Kuhn, E. M., Fiske, A., Henningsen, P., & Buyx, A. (2021) · Psychiatrische Praxis · doi:10.1055/a-1369-2938 · Cited by 13
The murder of knowledge and the ghosts that remain: non-disclosure agreements and their effects
Pagan, V. (2021) · Culture and Organization · doi:10.1080/14759551.2021.1907389 · Cited by 12
Bonotti, M., & Seglow, J. (2021) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12759 · Cited by 13
Professional Responsibility: Conceptual Rescue and Plea for Reform
Delacroix, S. (2021) · Oxford Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1093/ojls/gqab010 · Cited by 12
The Familiarity Paradox: Why Has Digital Sourcing Not Democratized the News?
Barnoy, A., & Reich, Z. (2021) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1937254 · Cited by 12
Palukka, H., Haapakorpi, A., Auvinen, P., & Parviainen, J. (2021) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1080/17482631.2021.1954744 · Cited by 12
Misgendering as epistemic injustice
Argyriou, K. (2021) · Las Torres de Lucca International Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.5209/ltdl.76464 · Cited by 13
Chick, N. L., Abbot, S., Mercer-Mapstone, L. D., Ostrowdun, C., & Grensavitch, K. (2021) · Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal · doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.2.2 · Cited by 12
Sharing the world without losing oneself: education in a pluralistic universe
O’Donnell, A. (2022) · Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · doi:10.1080/01596306.2022.2045072 · Cited by 12
Duijs, S. E., Abma, T., Schrijver, J., Bourik, Z., Abena‐Jaspers, Y., Jhingoeri, U., Plak, O., Senoussi, N., & Verdonk, P. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19095570 · Cited by 13
Experiences of epistemic racism among occupational therapists
Beagan, B. L., Sibbald, K. R., Pride, T. M., & Bizzeth, S. R. (2022) · Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional · doi:10.1590/2526-8910.ctoao24533211 · Cited by 12
Seppälä, T., Finell, E., & Kaikkonen, S. (2022) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1080/17482631.2022.2075533 · Cited by 12
Microtargeting people as a mere means 1
Jongepier, F., & Wieland, J. W. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003205425-10 · Cited by 12
Reviews Gone South: A Subversive Experiment on Participatory Design Canons
Reynolds-Cuéllar, P., Bohórquez, C. G., Wong-Villacrés, M., Serpa, B., Goñi, J., & Lemus, O. A. (2022) · Participatory Design Conference · doi:10.1145/3536169.3537794 · Cited by 13
21st century bridling: Non-disclosure agreements in cases of organizational misconduct
Pagan, V. (2022) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267221119129 · Cited by 13
Price, K. A., & Hill, M. R. (2021) · Communication Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/22041451.2021.2006113 · Cited by 12
Codó, E., & Gil, E. R. (2022) · International Journal of the Sociology of Language · doi:10.1515/ijsl-2021-0076 · Cited by 12
The collective epistemic reasons of social-identity groups
Mitova, V. (2022) · Asian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s44204-022-00051-1 · Cited by 12
Hädicke, M., Föcker, M., Romer, G., & Wiesemann, C. (2022) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180122000251 · Cited by 13
Futures labs: a space for pedagogies of responsible innovation
Conley, S. N., Tabas, B., & York, E. R. (2022) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2022.2129179 · Cited by 14
López, S. U. (2023) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2022.2160552 · Cited by 12
Irvine, A. L., & Haggar, T. (2023) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-023-02449-5 · Cited by 13
Gunnarsson, L., & Wemrell, M. (2023) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13643 · Cited by 12
Introducing the SMILE_PH method: Sense-making interviews looking at elements of philosophical health
de Miranda, L. (2023) · Methodological Innovations · doi:10.1177/20597991231179336 · Cited by 12
On the site of predictive justice
Lazar, S., & Stone, J. O. H. (2023) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12477 · Cited by 14
How do parents frame their engagement experience in early intervention? A grounded theory study
Harniess, P., Basu, A. P., Bezemer, J., & Gibbs, D. (2023) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2023.2242788 · Cited by 12
On masks and masking: epistemic harms and science communication
Intemann, K. K., & de Melo‐Martín, I. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04322-z · Cited by 12
Thind, R., & Yakavenka, H. (2023) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100870 · Cited by 18
Hobbs, T., de Lima, E. S., Bevington, D., Preece, C., Allen, K., Barna, P., Berry, V., Booker, T. L., Davies, K., Davis, G. D., et al. (2023) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20095.1 · Cited by 12
The Intended Uses of Automated Fact-Checking Artefacts: Why, How and Who
Schlichtkrull, M., Ousidhoum, N. D., & Vlachos, A. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.577 · Cited by 15
Disability activism and institutional heritage
Carnemolla, P., & Steele, L. R. (2023) · International Journal of Heritage Studies · doi:10.1080/13527258.2023.2294740 · Cited by 12
The Functions of Environmental Art
Bullot, N. J. (2014) · Leonardo · doi:10.1162/leon_a_00828 · Cited by 12
Overholtzer, L. (2015) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.7183/2326-3768.3.1.50 · Cited by 13
Resolving Religious Disagreements
Dormandy, K., & The Society of Christian Philosophers (2018) · Faith and Philosophy · doi:10.5840/faithphil201812697 · Cited by 12
Diversifying philosophy: The art of non-domination
Kirloskar-Steinbach, M. (2019) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2018.1562850 · Cited by 12
Defining an African Vocabulary for the Exploration of Possibilities in Higher Education
Kumalo, S. H. (2018) · Alternation Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of the Arts and Humanities in Southern Africa · doi:10.29086/2519-5476/2018/sp23a9 · Cited by 12
Rationality through the Eyes of Shame: Oppression and Liberation via Emotion*
Mun, C. (2019) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12472 · Cited by 12
Testifying Bodies: Testimonial Injustice as Derivatization
Cusick, C. M. (2019) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2019.1577919 · Cited by 12
Interruptions: Cultivating Truth-Telling as Resistance with Pre-service Teachers
Furman, C. E. (2019) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1007/s11217-019-09681-0 · Cited by 12
From Design to Data Handling. Why mHealth Needs a Feminist Perspective
Hendl, T., Jansky, B., & Wild, V. (2019) · Techno:Phil · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-04967-4_5 · Cited by 13
Justice and Vulnerability in Europe
Knijn, G., Hiah, J., Knijn, T., & Lepianka, D. (2020) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781839108488 · Cited by 12
Bezerra, J., & Paphitis, S. A. (2021) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2021.1900962 · Cited by 13
Responsibility for Collective Epistemic Harms
Fleisher, W., & Šešelja, D. (2022) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1017/psa.2022.9 · Cited by 12
Salustri, A., Cocco, V., & Mawroh, H. (2022) · Journal of Foodservice Business Research · doi:10.1080/15378020.2022.2058312 · Cited by 12
Jiménez, L. G., & Herrero, E. (2022) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtac002 · Cited by 12
Lemma, A. (2023) · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780192858962.001.0001 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
