The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,301–2,400 of 12,257
‘They Treated Him Well’: Fact, Fiction, and the Politics of Knowledge
Code, L. B. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_10 · Cited by 12
What is it to do good medical ethics? Minding the gap(s)
Bowman, D. (2014) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102299 · Cited by 12
Hedden, B. (2017) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2016.1270364 · Cited by 12
4 Race, Retention, Language, and Literacy
Faison, W., & Treviño, A. K. (2020) · Utah State University Press eBooks · doi:10.7330/9781607329589.c004 · Cited by 12
Participatory Video as a Tool for Cultivating Political and Feminist Capabilities of Women in Turkey
Cin, F. M., & KÜRÜM, R. S. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56197-0_7 · Cited by 12
Human-Computer Insurrection: Notes on an Anarchist HCIPreprint
Keyes, O., Hoy, J., & Drouhard, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.06167 · Cited by 14
Rodríguez-Dorans, E., Murray, F., de Andrade, M., Wyatt, J., & Stenhouse, R. (2021) · International Review of Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1940844721991079 · Cited by 13
Reactive Attitudes and AI-Agents – Making Sense of Responsibility and Control Gaps
Rebera, A. P. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00808-x · Cited by 11
The role of clinicians in the looping effect: epistemic injustices and looping breaks
Gauld, C., Nicolle, B., Constant, A., & Gagné‐Julien, A. (2025) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-025-10279-2 · Cited by 12
Underrecognition of Dysmenorrhea Is an Iatrogenic Harm
Doleeb, Z., McCoy, L. G., Dada, J., & Allaire, C. (2022) · The AMA Journal of Ethic · doi:10.1001/amajethics.2022.740 · Cited by 11
Fragoso, K. P. (2022) · Journal of Global Ethics · doi:10.1080/17449626.2022.2117232 · Cited by 15
Huang, Z. M. (2023) · Language and Intercultural Communication · doi:10.1080/14708477.2022.2162064 · Cited by 11
Whose Hermeneutical Marginalization?
Clanchy, N. (2023) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2023.16 · Cited by 11
Thambinathan, V., Kinsella, E. A., & Wylie, L. (2023) · SSM - Mental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100225 · Cited by 15
A multidimensional account of social justice for global health research
Pratt, B. (2023) · Bioethics · doi:10.1111/bioe.13186 · Cited by 11
Educational challenges for Nordic exceptionalism
Clarke, K., & Vertelyté, M. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003245155-3 · Cited by 11
Whitney, S. (2023) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-023-09924-z · Cited by 12
Singer, D. J. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197660386.001.0001 · Cited by 11
Collective writing as survival tool: Mechanisms of reflexivity against neoliberal academia
Campbell, S., Millán, E. F., Wolf, O., Thornton, R., & Riva, S. (2024) · Emotion, space and society · doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2024.101007 · Cited by 11
Linguistic domination: A republican approach to linguistic justice
Morales‐Gálvez, S. (2024) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537241239093 · Cited by 12
Hunt, J., Runacres, J., Herron, D., & Sheffield, D. (2024) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6519 · Cited by 11
Toward an African Critical Orientation
Chirindo, K., & Mutua, E. M. (2024) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2024.2345517 · Cited by 11
Informed Ignorance as a Form of Epistemic Injustice
Cohen, N., & Garasic, M. D. (2024) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies9030059 · Cited by 11
Reformative concept analysis for applied psychology qualitative research
Wynn, G. (2024) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2024.2346851 · Cited by 11
Barcham, M. (2023) · Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI) · doi:10.1145/3638380.3638430 · Cited by 11
Myerscough, F., Schneider-Reuter, L., & Faissner, M. (2024) · Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13010-024-00157-9 · Cited by 11
McAvinchey, C., Bartley, S., Dean, D., & Greene, A. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009525909 · Cited by 11
Unlearning Communication for Social Change—A Pedagogical Proposition
Tufte, T. (2024) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci13070335 · Cited by 11
Verbeek, L., Koning, M. H. M., & Schippers, A. (2024) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci13080408 · Cited by 11
Is epistemic injustice a worthy application to mental health nurse education?
Fisher, J. (2024) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/09697330241259154 · Cited by 11
Victimization as transformative experience: A phenomenological perspective
Pemberton, A., & Mulder, E. (2024) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/13624806241271764 · Cited by 11
Alpert, A. B., Babbs, G., Sanaeikia, R., Ellison, J. E., Hughes, L. D., Herington, J., & Dembroff, R. (2024) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-024-02111-w · Cited by 11
Shaw, J., & Wickenden, M. (2024) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069241257948 · Cited by 11
Credible, Competent Contributors: Children and Young People as Postdigital Citizen Social Scientists
MacKenzie, A. (2024) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-024-00517-w · Cited by 11
Gender knowledge production and epistemology in the incelosphere
Wilén, E. J., Wemrell, M., & Gunnarsson, L. (2024) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2024.2427192 · Cited by 14
Ecofeminist struggle for epistemic recognition beyond the EU? The case of Akbelen Forest in Turkey
Soyaltın, D., & Gönenç, D. (2024) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2024.2431571 · Cited by 11
Participatory research approaches in long-term care facilities for older adults: a meta-ethnography
Gaber, S. N., Guerrero, M., & Rosenberg, L. (2024) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1080/17482631.2024.2431449 · Cited by 11
A framework for promoting disciplinary diversity and inclusion through epistemic justice
Nyssa, Z., Winkler‐Schor, S., Lôbo, D., Eyster, H. N., & Wright, A. J. (2024) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.14409 · Cited by 11
Epistemic justice: An ethical basis for transdisciplinary and transformative sustainability research
Meisch, S. (2024) · GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society · doi:10.14512/gaia.33.4.9 · Cited by 13
Pritchard, D. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04898-0 · Cited by 11
Magnus, P. D. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.29 · Cited by 12
Algorithmic emergence? Epistemic in/justice in AI-directed transformations of healthcare
Emah, I., & Bennett, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1520810 · Cited by 11
Evaluation of policies for disability and social inclusion in Colombian higher education
Gómez, C. L., Farieta, A., & Sarmiento, M. P. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100454 · Cited by 11
Enacting a politics of possibilities against Zulm and towards Azadi from coloniality and occupation
Pandit, N. (2025) · European Journal of Women s Studies · doi:10.1177/13505068251327067 · Cited by 11
Critical Thinking and Mental Health Nurse Education
Fisher, J. (2025) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.70021 · Cited by 11
Toward epistemic justice in social work research: (Re) imagining global knowledge production
Maleku, A. (2025) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcaf052 · Cited by 13
da Silva, E. C., Guerrero-Moreno, M. A., Oliveira, F. A., Dias-Silva, K., Juen, L., Moura, J. F., de Carvalho, F. G., & de Oliveira, J. M. B. (2025) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126936 · Cited by 11
Gallagher, K., & Hopkyns, S. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103729 · Cited by 11
Lefay, G., Briand, C., Sauvageau, A., Drolet, M.-J., Vachon, B., Luconi, F., Thomas, A., & Nadeau-Tremblay, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1613074 · Cited by 11
Testimony and Historical Knowledge
Ahlskog, J. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009447041 · Cited by 12
Relational Ethics and Structural Epistemic Injustice of AI in Medicine
Herzog, C., & Branford, J. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00987-1 · Cited by 11
Innovation curse: the wastefulness of technologies believed to mitigate climate change
Nguyen, M.-H., Gagnon, V. S., Tran, T. T., & Tran, T. M. A. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-06098-8 · Cited by 13
AGENCY ASCRIPTIONS IN ETHICS AND EPISTEMOLOGY: OR, NAVIGATING INTERSECTIONS, NARROW AND BROAD
Axtell, G. S. (2010) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01622.x · Cited by 11
Survey Article: On the Nature of the Political Concept of Privilege
McKinnon, R., & Sennet, A. (2017) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/jopp.12113 · Cited by 11
Unconscious Racial Prejudice as Psychological Resistance: A Limitation of the Implicit Bias Model
Gallegos, L. (2018) · Critical Philosophy of Race · doi:10.5325/critphilrace.6.2.0262 · Cited by 11
What’s Missing? A Typology of Political Absence
Dovi, S. (2019) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/706979 · Cited by 14
Mathematical practice and epistemic virtue and vice
Tanswell, F. S., & Kidd, I. J. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02664-6 · Cited by 11
Jenkins, K., Toledo, H., & Oyarzo, A. V. (2020) · Emotion, space and society · doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2020.100721 · Cited by 11
Einleitung: Was ist Diskriminierung und was genau ist daran moralisch falsch?
Klonschinski, A. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie · doi:10.22613/zfpp/7.1.5 · Cited by 11
Environmental justice and the politics of climate change adaptation – the case of Venice
Alba, R., Klepp, S., & Bruns, A. (2020) · Geographica Helvetica · doi:10.5194/gh-75-363-2020 · Cited by 11
Escrita, memória e cuidado - testemunhos de trabalhadores de saúde na pandemia
Junior, O. D. D. S., Muñoz, N. M., Silva, A. C. M., Leal, B. M. P. D. S., Gomes, B. R., Cabral, C. C., Vargas, M. T. T., Giuntini, M. B., Lopes, R., & Leal, E. M. (2020) · Revista Latinoamericana de Psicopatologia Fundamental · doi:10.1590/1415-4714.2020v23n3p620.10 · Cited by 11
Rethinking Epistemic Appropriation
Podosky, P. C. (2021) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2021.8 · Cited by 11
Martino, W., Omercajic, K., & Cumming-Potvin, W. M. (2021) · Pedagogy Culture and Society · doi:10.1080/14681366.2021.1912156 · Cited by 13
Ballis, A., & Schwendemann, L. (2021) · Holocaust Studies · doi:10.1080/17504902.2021.1915016 · Cited by 11
False Confessions and Subverted Agency
Lackey, J. A. (2021) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246121000072 · Cited by 11
What Anansi Did for Us: Storytelling’s Value in Equitably Exploring Public Health
Fakunle, D. O., Thomas, D. T., Gonzales, K. A. M., Vidot, D. C., & Johnson, L. P. (2021) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/10901981211009741 · Cited by 11
The struggle for recognition and the authority of the second person
Khurana, T. (2021) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.12675 · Cited by 11
Stones, A., & Pearce, J. (2021) · Journal of Religious Education · doi:10.1007/s40839-021-00155-5 · Cited by 11
Capable deliberators: towards inclusion of minority minds in discourse practices
Schramme, T. (2021) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2021.2020550 · Cited by 11
Soliman, M., Sulin, L., & Karlıdağ-Dennis, E. (2022) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2021.2019690 · Cited by 11
Theoretical diversity and inclusivity in science and environmental education research: A way forward
Hunter, R. H., & Richmond, G. (2022) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21752 · Cited by 14
Dijkstra, R., Elbers, N. A., Friele, R. D., & Pemberton, A. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08021-2 · Cited by 11
Kuri, E., & Schormans, A. F. (2022) · The Arts in Psychotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.aip.2022.101920 · Cited by 14
Hall, J. W., Kroll, T., van Wijck, F., & Bassil‐Morozow, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · doi:10.3389/fresc.2022.877442 · Cited by 11
Sexual misconduct in UK higher education and the precarity of institutional knowledge
Page, T. (2022) · British Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/01425692.2022.2057924 · Cited by 11
Appreciative Silencing in Communicative Exchange
Tobi, A. (2022) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2022.24 · Cited by 11
Who needs to (un)know? On the generative possibilities of ignorance for autistic futures
Orsini, M. (2022) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2022.2098399 · Cited by 11
Nontoxic: Masculinity, Allyship, and Feminist Philosophy
Almassi, B. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13071-7 · Cited by 12
Children's lives and rights under lockdown: A Northern Irish perspective by autistic young people
O’Hagan, G., & Byrne, B. (2022) · Children & Society · doi:10.1111/chso.12651 · Cited by 11
Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias
Hundleby, C. E. (2023) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-023-09603-y · Cited by 11
A Dutch Study of Remarkable Recoveries After Prayer: How to Deal with Uncertainties of Explanation
Bendien, E., Kruijthoff, D. J., van der Kooi, C., Glas, G., & Abma, T. (2023) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-023-01750-6 · Cited by 11
Does the Critical Scrutiny of Drill Constitute an Epistemic Injustice?
Jalloh, T. (2022) · The British Journal of Aesthetics · doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayac041 · Cited by 11
Cook, E. A., Rowlands, J., Bracewell, K., Jones, C. A., & Boughton, G. (2023) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-023-00505-x · Cited by 11
Closing the Conceptual Gap in Epistemic Injustice
Fürst, M. (2023) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqad024 · Cited by 16
When Words Fail: “Miscarriage,” Referential Ambiguity, and Psychological Harm
Bohn, J. A. (2023) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhad013 · Cited by 11
Sauer, H. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003375753 · Cited by 13
Nouf-Latif, F., & Ineland, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1156835 · Cited by 15
A conceptual framework for culturally appropriate advocacy with racialised groups
Salla, A., Newbigging, K., Joseph, D., & Eneje, E. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1173591 · Cited by 13
Jauffret‐Roustide, M. (2023) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00380261231176894 · Cited by 11
Gélineau, L., Dupéré, S., Richard, J., & Collective, V. (2023) · Action Research · doi:10.1177/14767503231205237 · Cited by 11
Sustaining professionalism: Teachers as co‐enquirers in curriculum design
Swift, D., Clowes, G. A., Gilbert, S., & Lambert, A. (2024) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1002/curj.267 · Cited by 12
Uncovering Reproductive Injustice Toward Women With Disabilities
Pacheco, L., Mercerat, C., Aunos, M., Cousineau, M., Goulden, A., Swab, M., Brenton, B., & Moyo, S. (2024) · International Perspectives in Psychology · doi:10.1027/2157-3891/a000103 · Cited by 11
Babu, S., Koven, M., Thompson, C. M., & Makos, S. (2024) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2024.2386716 · Cited by 11
The Changing Meaning of Privacy, Identity and Contemporary Feminist Philosophy
Richardson, J. (2011) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-011-9257-8 · Cited by 11
Justicia epist�mica y epistemolog�as del Sur
Estrada, M. M. (2017) · OXÍMORA Revista Internacional de Ética y Política · doi:10.1344/oxi.2017.i10.18990 · Cited by 11
Being a Foreigner in Philosophy: A Taxonomy
Erlenbusch-Anderson, V. (2017) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12377 · Cited by 11
Legitimate Expectations, Historical Injustice, and Perverse Incentives for Settlers
Waligore, T. (2017) · Moral Philosophy and Politics · doi:10.1515/mopp-2016-0032 · Cited by 11
Artifacts, Contested Histories, and Other Archaeological Hotspots
Clark, B. J. (2018) · Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s41636-018-0128-5 · Cited by 11
Reliabilism without Epistemic Consequentialism
Sylvan, K. (2018) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12560 · Cited by 11
From Philosophy of Emotion to Epistemology: Some Questions About the Epistemic Relevance of Emotions
Candiotto, L. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15667-1_1 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
