The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,401–3,500 of 12,257
Grasswick, H. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190628925.013.15 · Cited by 6
BEWARE OF SCHOOLS BEARING GIFTS
Táíwò, O. (2017) · Public Affairs Quarterly · doi:10.2307/26897014 · Cited by 6
Distributive and Relational Equality
Schemmel, C. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190084240.003.0002 · Cited by 6
“‘Big Bad Chinese Mama’: How Internet Humor Subverts Stereotypes about Asian American Women”
Seethaler, I. C. (2013) · Studies in American Humor · doi:10.2307/23823982 · Cited by 6
Villalobos, C., & Mardones, S. P. (2022) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.30.7515 · Cited by 6
Student teachers investigating the morality of corporal punishment in South Africa
Murris, K. (2012) · Ethics and Education · doi:10.1080/17449642.2012.672030 · Cited by 6
Does Discrimination Require Disadvantage?
Horta, Ó. (2015) · Moral Philosophy and Politics · doi:10.1515/mopp-2014-0032 · Cited by 6
The Generation of Knowledge from Multiple Testimonies
Tucker, A. (2015) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2015.1065927 · Cited by 6
Zamora, J. S. (2017) · The Journal of Speculative Philosophy · doi:10.5325/jspecphil.31.2.0299 · Cited by 6
The identities and practices of school administrative clerks in selected schools in the Western Cape
Bayat, A. (2014) · SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) · Cited by 6
Whose knowledge counts? : exploring cognitive justice in community-university collaborations
Davies, C. J. (2016) · Cited by 6
Medical knowledge in a social world: Introduction to the special issue
Holman, B., Bernecker, S., & Garbayo, L. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1779-7 · Cited by 6
Minding the epistemic gap in covid-19 and beyond
Goldbeck-Wood, S. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m2379 · Cited by 6
Epistemic Injustice Expanded: A Feminist, Animal Studies Approach
Tuvel, R. (2014) · Cited by 6
Gendered Divisions of Labor in the Twenty‐First‐Century Academy
Park, S. M., & Park‐Ozee, D. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119257639.ch19 · Cited by 6
Macneill, P. U., Jordens, C. F. C., Zion, D., & Dawson, A. (2021) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1861376 · Cited by 6
Croce, Y. D., Gianni, M., & Marino, V. (2021) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1870764 · Cited by 6
On decolonial revisions of modern social theory
Khoo, S.-M. (2021) · International Sociology · doi:10.1177/02685809211057468 · Cited by 6
Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse
(2020) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781526421036823501 · Cited by 6
Knowledge Translation in the Global South: An Exploratory Mapping of the Literature
Combaz, É., Connor, M., & Georgalakis, J. (2023) · doi:10.19088/ids.2023.033 · Cited by 6
Publishing, Precarious Labour Relations and Sexual Violence in Academia
Godden-Rasul, N., & Serisier, T. (2024) · Feminist Legal Studies · doi:10.1007/s10691-024-09561-0 · Cited by 6
Asserting Indigenous Academic Sovereignty Through Assemblage, Indigenization, and Cultural Safety
Torris-Hedlund, M. A., Palakiko, D., & Komene, E. (2025) · Creative Nursing · doi:10.1177/10784535251357218 · Cited by 6
Jounou, I. P., Delgado, J., Blanc, S., & Caballero, R. T. (2025) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2025.2525772 · Cited by 6
Nolte, T., Schwarzer, N.-H., Riedl, D., Lashani, E., Kampling, H., Campbell, C., Brähler, E., Sachser, C., Fegert, J. M., Balint, E. M., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.09.03.25331929 · Cited by 6
A scoping review of classroom readiness: what is it? Can it (and should it) be assessed?
Spooner-Lane, R., Spina, N., Briant, E., & Mascadri, J. (2025) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/1359866x.2025.2494727 · Cited by 5
Davies, A., Richardson, B., & Abawi, Z. E. (2024) · Pedagogy Culture and Society · doi:10.1080/14681366.2024.2355100 · Cited by 5
Entre religieux et séculier : les récits complotistes à l’ère de l’ultramodernité
Tremblay, S., & Colin, M. (2024) · Politique et Sociétés · doi:10.7202/1111456ar · Cited by 5
Portmore, D. W. (2024) · The Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10892-024-09492-7 · Cited by 5
Expressive Epistemic Injustice: Definition, Measurement, and Deliberative Cure
Dryzek, J. S., & Niemeyer, S. (2024) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129241297272 · Cited by 7
Epistemic injustice in planning: a framework for identifying degrees of harm
Lennon, M., & Kamjou, E. (2024) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839.2024.2428218 · Cited by 5
Trans epistemicide and the implications for education
Kuhl, D. (2024) · Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · doi:10.1080/01596306.2024.2426296 · Cited by 5
The physical education curriculum in alternative provision schools in England: A Gramscian critique
Maher, A. J., Quarmby, T., Hooper, O., Wells, V., & Slavin, L. (2025) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1002/curj.317 · Cited by 5
What’s in a name? Reclaiming Third World feminism for epistemic and transnational justice
Arat, Z. F. K. (2025) · International Feminist Journal of Politics · doi:10.1080/14616742.2025.2456604 · Cited by 5
Post-growth and the lack of diversity in the scenario framework
Skaf, R. E. (2025) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/1350178x.2025.2480069 · Cited by 5
Socially Disruptive Technologies, Moral Progress, and Rule Following
Lane, B. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00897-2 · Cited by 5
Physical education teacher education: disrupting ableism in gymnastics
McVeigh, J., Maher, A. J., Thomson, A., & Knight, J. (2025) · Sport Education and Society · doi:10.1080/13573322.2025.2511987 · Cited by 5
Patel, S. M., Zayhowski, K., Diaz, J. S., & Carmichael, N. E. (2025) · Journal of Genetic Counseling · doi:10.1002/jgc4.70062 · Cited by 5
O’Shea, E., Timmons, S., & Irving, K. (2025) · Frontiers in Dementia · doi:10.3389/frdem.2025.1596393 · Cited by 5
Appropriating Empowerment: Precision Medicine’s Proclivity to Epistemic Injustice
Kenis, D. (2025) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2025.17 · Cited by 5
From Testosterone to Racialization to Knobby Knees: 15 Years of Gender/Sex
van Anders, S. M. (2025) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.70090 · Cited by 5
Decolonising with imperial tools? The paradox of a global bioethics library
Sachdev, V., Bandara, K., & Swana, M. (2025) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2025-013421 · Cited by 6
A framework for evaluating cultural bias and historical misconceptions in LLMs outputs
Mak, M.-K., & Luo, T. (2025) · BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks Standards and Evaluations · doi:10.1016/j.tbench.2025.100235 · Cited by 5
Dwivedi, A. V. (2025) · Emerging Media · doi:10.1177/27523543251373105 · Cited by 5
Ho, H. H. P., Little, V., & Eti-Tofinga, B. (2025) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2025.2566931 · Cited by 6
Naeem, H. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00988-0 · Cited by 5
Nguyen, M., Mahfoozi, S., Bonner, D. E., Martschenko, D. O., Giri, A., Tang, C., Bernstein, J. A., Wheeler, M. T., & Halley, M. C. (2025) · Molecular Genetics and Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2025.109283 · Cited by 5
Reimagining open science for global health: Epistemic power and the pursuit of health equity
Teixeira, A. R., Kleinlein, R., Kalema, N. L., Agyemang, G. O., Senteio, C. R., Celi, L. A., Agyemang, S., & Kebede, M. A. (2025) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0005300 · Cited by 5
Epistemic Injustice in and through AI
Chamma, D., Ahmadpour, N., Ahmed, S. I., Mim, N. J., Zhang, W. Q., di Bona, K., Sachathep, T., Horst, H. A., & Harb, J. I. (2025) · Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (OzCHI) · doi:10.1145/3764687.3767279 · Cited by 5
Sultan, M. I., Akbar, M., Mau, M., & Sonni, A. F. (2025) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia6040193 · Cited by 5
Hayes, S., Earle, S., Dukhan, S., Padayachee, K., Dison, L., Milaras, M., Smit-Stachowski, A., Aharonson, V., Hoosen, N., Luo, M., et al. (2025) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-025-00593-6 · Cited by 7
Inclusion by design a-neuro-cognitive trait interaction approach-to neurodivergent research
Dark, J. (2025) · Methodological Innovations · doi:10.1177/20597991251396144 · Cited by 5
Emancipatory Information Retrieval
Mitra, B. (2025) · Information Retrieval Research · doi:10.54195/irrj.24531 · Cited by 5
Maccaro, A. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02854-9 · Cited by 5
Backstage Participation: Mess and Muddle in Youth-Focused, Arts-Based Mental Health Research
Batool, S. S., Bennett, G., Cooke, P. A., Hanrahan, J., Hugh‐Jones, S., Lalh, S., Lee, D., Mankee‐Williams, A., Piotrowska, N., Shaughnessy, N., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251410344 · Cited by 5
Carlson, B. L. (2026) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/14407833261423228 · Cited by 5
Truth without belief: can LLM-generated content satisfy classical theories of truth?
Zhang, X., & Li, H. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01065-8 · Cited by 5
Malik, I. H. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-06826-8 · Cited by 5
Bury, S. M., Dwyer, P. S. R., Flower, R. L., Richardson, E. K., & Spoor, J. R. (2026) · Neurodiversity · doi:10.1177/27546330261430009 · Cited by 8
Liebling, A. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780198992622.001.0001 · Cited by 5
Why Should People with Lived Experience Be Included in the DSM Revision Process?
Gagné‐Julien, A., & Friesen, P. (2026) · The Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.70051 · Cited by 5
Côte, C. I. (2026) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhag003 · Cited by 5
Kwok, C. (2026) · European Journal of Political Theory · doi:10.1177/14748851261438075 · Cited by 5
AI-Produced Humanities Research: On the Dangers of Technical Incrementalism
Metcalf, T. R. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01085-6 · Cited by 7
Zero-click AI epistemic injustice and the governance of digital knowledge infrastructures
Öztürkcan, S. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01164-9 · Cited by 5
Son, E. J., Hillman, J. G., Jyung, M., Hauser, D., & van Anders, S. M. (2026) · Psychology and Sexuality · doi:10.1080/19419899.2026.2655663 · Cited by 5
Roberts, D. (2026) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2026.2659094 · Cited by 5
Elwyn, R., Schweizer, K. W., Cobbaert, L., Gall, A., Gall, Z., Pellizzer, M. L., Park, J., & Jackman, M. R. (2026) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-026-01670-2 · Cited by 5
Aivalli, P., Hebbar, P. B., Mbachu, C. O., Srinivas, P. N., Abímbọ́lá, Ṣ., & Dada, S. (2025) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czaf080 · Cited by 5
CHAPTER 11: Signposts for people’s knowledge
Wakeford, T. (2016) · Practical Action Publishing eBooks · doi:10.3362/9781780449395.012 · Cited by 5
The (un)common good: diverging justifications for wilderness making in a modified landscape
Lennon, M., Duvall, P., & O’Neill, E. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2019.1697656 · Cited by 5
What is evidence as evidence is used? A case of dualism?
Fletcher, A. (2021) · Social Theory & Health · doi:10.1057/s41285-021-00170-4 · Cited by 5
Judgments, preferences, and compromise
Jones, P. V., & O’Flynn, I. (2022) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12454 · Cited by 5
Jacques, B. (2022) · Dialogue · doi:10.1017/s0012217322000221 · Cited by 5
Articulating the social: Expressive domination and Dewey’s epistemic argument for democracy
Zamora, J. S. (2022) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537221114912 · Cited by 5
Epistemische Ungerechtigkeiten in und durch Algorithmen – ein Überblick
Kassar, N. E. (2022) · Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie · doi:10.22613/zfpp/9.1.11 · Cited by 6
Dwiwardani, C., & Whitney, W. B. (2022) · Journal of Psychology and Theology · doi:10.1177/00916471221130333 · Cited by 5
A Literary Turn in African Studies
Acheampong, K. (2022) · The Thinker · doi:10.36615/the_thinker.v93i4.2206 · Cited by 5
Fame and redemption: On the moral dangers of celebrity apologies
Matheson, B. (2023) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12510 · Cited by 5
Towards Epistemic Translatability: On Epistemic Difference and Hermeneutical Injustice
Vannini, A. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2188127 · Cited by 5
Mardegan, A. M. (2023) · Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal · doi:10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.788 · Cited by 5
Caby, V. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01808-6 · Cited by 6
Serdeczny, O. M. (2023) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00727 · Cited by 5
Trauma, trust, & competent testimony
Goldwasser, S., & Springle, A. A. (2023) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2023.2247011 · Cited by 6
Formabiap’s Indigenous educative community, Peru: a biosocial pedagogy
Rahman, E., Freedman, F. B., Rivera, F. A. G., & Ríos, M. C. C. (2023) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2023.2223921 · Cited by 7
Heil, M. (2023) · Urban Geography · doi:10.1080/02723638.2023.2259689 · Cited by 5
Urbaniak, A. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003254829-3 · Cited by 5
First-person perspectives and scientific inquiry of autism: towards an integrative approach
Arnaud, S. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04384-z · Cited by 5
Beyond the Land of Thorns: Epistemic Authorship in Dual Language Bilingual Education
Solano-Campos, A. T. (2023) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/00420859231214210 · Cited by 5
The Contribution of Logic to Epistemic Injustice
Mangraviti, F. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2291775 · Cited by 5
Research collaboration in development economics
Amarante, V., & Zurbrigg, J. (2023) · Review of Development Economics · doi:10.1111/rode.13078 · Cited by 5
Testimony of Oppression and the Limits of Empathy
Sodoma, K. A. (2024) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-023-10430-z · Cited by 5
Fear Generalization and Mnemonic Injustice
Trakas, M., & Puddifoot, K. (2024) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2023.60 · Cited by 5
Are Metaphors Ethically Bad Epistemic Practice? Epistemic Injustice at the Intersections
Sibbald, K. R. (2023) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2023.90 · Cited by 5
Mai, L. (2024) · Transnational Environmental Law · doi:10.1017/s2047102523000213 · Cited by 5
Meza, A. F. S. (2024) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel15030336 · Cited by 5
The harms of the internalized oppression worry
Dular, N., & Ward, M. (2024) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12562 · Cited by 5
McEntee, M., Thomas, K., Mullen, M., Houghton, C., Harvey, M., & Craig-Smith, A. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16083124 · Cited by 5
Simcock, P., Manthorpe, J., & Tinker, A. (2024) · Qualitative Social Work · doi:10.1177/14733250241250140 · Cited by 5
Foulds, C., Robison, R., & Schönwälder, G. (2024) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103581 · Cited by 5
ÉTICA Y GÉNERO EN LA IA: IDENTIFICAR SESGOS DE GÉNERO EN IA MEDIANTE PENSAMIENTO COMPLEJO
Pérez, M. N. V. (2024) · Revista Iberoamericana de Complejidad y Ciencias Económicas · doi:10.48168/ricce.v2n2p49 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
