Cited by 501Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Word-form dyslexia

WARRINGTON, ELIZABETH K., SHALLICE, TIM·1980·Brain

Abstract

In this study we have reported our investigation of two patients with an acquired dyslexia characterized by letter-by-letter reading, whole word reading being apparently impossible. It has been shown that this phenomenon of letter-by-letter reading cannot be accounted for by visual or perceptual factors nor by impairment of visual span of apprehension. The exceptionally slow speed of reading was documented and a clear relationship between word length and reading speed established. Performance on tasks considered to maximize whole word reading which at the same time prevent the possibility of letter-by-letter reading, namely, reading script and reading with tachistoscopic presentation, was impaired. The satisfactory performance of these two patients on tasks of picture interpretation suggests that the two components of the syndrome simultanagnosia, letter-by-letter reading and piecemeal perception of complex scenes, are dissociable. Three alternative explanations of letter-by-letter reading are considered and we conclude that in this type of acquired dyslexia there is damage to the system through which a visual word-form is attained.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/103.1.99

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selective damage to the left fusiform region impairs visual but not auditory word recognition.

    “Finally, converging neuropsychological evidence indicates that selective damage to the left fusiform region impairs visual but not auditory word recognition (Box 1).”
  • Pure alexia results in an impaired ability to read words in a rapid, parallel fashion.

    “Pure alexia (PA; also known as 'word form dyslexia' or 'letter-byletter reading') results in an impaired ability to read words in a rapid, parallel fashion [46,47].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WARRINGTON, E. K., & SHALLICE, T.
Affiliations
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
Venue
Brain
Published
1980
Volume
103
Issue
1
Pages
99-112
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2161474680
Cited by
501
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 20
FWCI
10.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
acquired dyslexia, letter-by-letter reading, simultanagnosia, visual word recognition, reading speed, word length, tachistoscopic presentation, image interpretation
MeSH terms
Adult, Agnosia, Attention, Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Neoplasms, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Dyslexia, Acquired, Female, Glioblastoma, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Reading, Verbal Learning, Visual Fields, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review