Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 526

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

PROCEDURAL LEARNING AND NEOSTYRIAL DYSFUNCTION IN MAN

SAINT-CYR, J. A., TAYLOR, A. E., LANG, A. E·1988·Brain
DOI 10.1093/brain/111.4.941
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Patients with early stage Parkinson's disease are shown to be selectively impaired in a cognitive task of procedural learning while remaining intact in recall and recognition tests of declarative memory. In contrast, amnestic patients showed the opposite set of deficits, thus demonstrating a double dissociation. Patients with early Huntington's disease were either comparable to the parkinsonian patients or to amnestics. In the advanced Huntington's group, both procedural learning and declarative memory were impaired. It is argued that cognitive procedural learning depends on the establishment of heuristic strategies through the action of a circuit which involves the neostriatum and the prefrontal cortex.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/111.4.941

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
SAINT-CYR, J. A., TAYLOR, A. E., & LANG, A. E.
Venue
Brain
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1988-08-01
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
941-960
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
DOI
10.1093/brain/111.4.941
OpenAlex
W2130087379
Cited by
526
References
0
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.