Cited by 191Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Cortical cholinergic function and deficits in visual attentional performance in rats following 192 IgG–saporin-induced lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex

Dalley, J. W.·2004·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Lesions of the basal forebrain (BF) cortical cholinergic system impair performance on a rodent five-choice visual attentional task. This study examines the effects on the same task of selective depletion of acetylcholine from the prefrontal cortex (PFC) using 192 IgG-saporin, the cholinergic immunotoxin. Rats were trained to detect brief visual stimuli, either presented unpredictably both temporally and spatially to increase attentional load, or under less demanding conditions where stimuli were temporally and spatially predictable. Following training, 192 IgG-saporin (50 ng or 100 ng/infusion) or its vehicle was infused bilaterally into the ventromedial PFC. The 100 ng lesion group exhibited post-operatively a transient increase in perseveration, specifically when the visual stimuli were temporally unpredictable. A vigilance decrement, as well as a reinstatement of perseverative responding occurred in both lesion groups under conditions of enhanced attentional load, specifically with high target frequency sustained over many trials. Lesioned subjects were also more impulsive with increased anticipatory errors. Systemic administration of the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine further dissociated the groups with attentional accuracy in the 100 ng group decreasing relative to shams. These findings are consistent with an important modulatory influence of PFC function by BF cholinergic neurons, particularly during increased attentional demand.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhh052

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lesions of the anterior cingulate cortex disrupt performance on the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task (5-CSRTT).

    “Lesions of the anterior cingulate cortex disrupt performance on the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task (5-CSRTT) (Dalley et al., 2004)”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Dalley et al., 2004

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that lesions of the entire medial prefrontal cortex disrupt 5-CSRT task performance, but it does not establish that lesions specifically of the anterior cingulate cortex do so. It also reports performance changes after lesions that spare the anterior cingulate cortex. The paper’s own results concern cholinergic lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex, not isolated anterior cingulate lesions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cholinergic activity is intrinsic to 5-CSRTT performance.

    “while related studies show how cholinergic activity is intrinsic to 5-CSRTT performance (Dalley et al., 2004).”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Dalley et al., 2004

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Baxter M, Bucci DJ, Gorman LK, Wiley RG, Gallagher M (1995) Selec- tive immunotoxic lesions of basal forebrain cholinergic cells: effects on learning and memory in rats. Behav Neurosci 109:714-722.
  2. Berger-Sweeney J, Heckers S, Mesulam MM, Wiley RG, Lappi DA, Sharma M (1994) Differential effects on spatial navigation of immu- notoxin-induced cholinergic lesions of the medial septal area and nucleus basalis maganocellularis. J Neurosci 14:4507-4519.
  3. Book AA, Wiley RG, Schweitzer JB (1992) Specificity of 192 IgG-saporin for NGF receptor positive cholinergic basal forebrain neurons in the rat. Brain Res 590:350-355.
  4. Heckers S, Ohtake T, Wiley RG, Lappi DA, Geula C, Mesulam MM (1994) Complete and selective cholinergic denervation of rat neocortex and hippocampus but not amygdala by an immunotoxin against p75 NGF receptor. J Neurosci 14:1271-1289.
  5. Holley LA, Wiley RG, Lappi DA, Sarter M (1994) Cortical cholinergic deafferentation following the intracortical infusion of 192 IgG-saporin: a quantitative histochemical study. Brain Res 663:277-286.
  6. Keppel G (1991) Design and analysis, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  7. Koelega HS (1989) Benzodiazepines and vigilance performance: a review. Psychopharmacology 98:145-156.
  8. Paxinos G, Watson C (1998) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Sydney: Academic Press.
  9. Torres EM, Perry TA, Blokland A, Wilkinson LS, Wiley RG, Lappi DA, Dunnett SB (1994) Behavioural, histochemical, and biochemical consequences of selective immunolesions in discrete regions of the basal forebrain cholinergic system. Neuroscience 63:95-122.
  10. Wenk GL, Stoehr JD, Quintana G, Mobley S, Wiley RG (1994) Behav- ioral, biochemical, histological and electrophysiological effects of 192 IgG-saporin injections into the basal forebrain of rats. J Neurosci 14:5986-5995.
  11. Wiley RG, Oeltmann TN, Lappi DA (1991) Immunolesioning: selective destruction of neurons using immunotoxin to rat NGF receptor. Brain Res 562:149-153.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dalley, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Dalley, J. W.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2004-03-28
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
922-932
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2171934036
Cited by
191
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
medial prefrontal cortex, 192 IgG-saporin, acetylcholine depletion, visual attention, 5-choice serial reaction time task, perseveration, vigilance decrement, impulsivity, scopolamine, muscarinic receptors, basal forebrain cholinergic neurons, attentional load, rats
MeSH terms
Saporins, Acetylcholine, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Immunotoxins, Arousal, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Male, N-Glycosyl Hydrolases, Tissue Distribution, Vision Disorders, Prefrontal Cortex, Rats, Ribosome Inactivating Proteins, Type 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review