Cited by 57Action Observation and SynchronizationNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeuroscience and Music Perception

Self awareness and speech processing: an fMRI study

Jardri, Renaud, Pins, Delphine, Bubrovszky, Maxime, Despretz, Pascal, Pruvo, Jean-Pierre, Steinling, Marc, Thomas, Pierre·2007·NeuroImage

Abstract

Language production and perception imply motor system recruitment. Therefore, language should obey the theory of shared motor representation between self and other, by means of mirror-like systems. These mirror-like systems (referring to single-unit recordings in animals) show the property to be recruited both when accomplishing and when perceiving a goal-directed action, whatever the sensory modality may be. This hypothesis supposes that a neural network for self-awareness is involved to distinguish speech production from speech listening. We used fMRI to test this assumption in 12 healthy subjects, who performed two different block-design experiments. The first experiment showed involvement of a lateral mirror-like network in speech listening, including ventral premotor cortex, superior temporal sulcus and the inferior parietal lobule (IPL). The activity of this mirror-like network is associated with the perception of an intelligible speech. The second experiment looked at a self-awareness network. It showed involvement of a medial resting-state network, including the medial parietal and medial prefrontal cortices, during the 'self-generated voice' condition, as opposed to passive speech listening. Our results support the fact that deactivation of this medial network, in association with modulation of the activity of the IPL (part of the mirror-like network previously described), is linked to self-awareness in speech processing. Overall, these results support the idea that self-awareness is present when distinguishing between speech production and speech listening situations, and may depend on these two different parieto-frontal networks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.002

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jardri, R., Pins, D., Bubrovszky, M., Despretz, P., Pruvo, J.-P., Steinling, M., & Thomas, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
Corresponding author
Jardri, Renaud
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
1645-1653
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035722506
Cited by
57
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
self-awareness, speech processing, mirror system, speech perception, speech production, ventral premotor cortex, superior temporal sulcus, inferior parietal lobule, medial parietal cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, parieto-frontal network
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Self Concept, Speech, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review