Cited by 102Sleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Associations between Short Sleep Duration and Central Obesity in Women

Theorell-Haglöw, Jenny, Berne, Christian, Janson, Christer, Sahlin, Carin, Lindberg, Eva·2010·Sleep

Abstract

The aim was to assess associations between sleep duration, sleep stages, and central obesity in women. Cross-sectional study. City of Uppsala, Sweden. Population-based sample of 400 women (range 20–70 years). Full-night polysomnography and measurement of anthropometric variables. Sleep duration was inversely related to both waist circumference and sagittal abdominal diameter. Sleep duration remained inversely related to waist circumference (adj. β = -1.22 cm/h; P = 0.016) and sagittal abdominal diameter (adj. β = -0.46 cm/h; P = 0.001) after adjusting for potential confounders. Duration of slow wave sleep (SWS, adj. β = -0.058 cm/min; P = 0.025) and REM sleep (adj. β = -0.062 cm/min; P = 0.002) were both inversely related to waist circumference after adjustments. Moreover, duration of REM sleep was inversely related to sagittal abdominal diameter (adj. β = -0.021 cm/min; P < 0.0001). These associations were stronger in young women (age < 50 years). An inverse relationship between short sleep duration and central obesity was found in women after adjusting for confounders. Loss of SWS and REM sleep may be important factors in the association between sleep loss and central obesity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/33.5.593

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four studies using objective measurements found a much stronger cross-sectional association than similar studies using self-reported data.

    “In support of this hypothesis, four studies that performed objective measurements reported a much stronger cross-sectional association than other studies of similar cross-sectional design but using self-reported data [63, 125, 182, 190].”

    From Sleep and metabolic function (2012) · cites this paper as [182]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Theorell-Haglöw, J., Berne, C., Janson, C., Sahlin, C., & Lindberg, E.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
Venue
Sleep
Published
2010-05
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
601-610
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W4321429268
Cited by
102
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SLEEP (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
short sleep duration, abdominal obesity, women, slow-wave sleep, REM sleep, sleep stages, waist circumference, sagittal abdominal diameter, sleep deprivation, young women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review