Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Suppression of Humoral Immunity in Mice following Exposure to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate

Peden-Adams, Margie M., Keller, Jennifer M., EuDaly, Jackie G., Berger, Jennifer, Gilkeson, Gary S., Keil, Deborah E.·2008·Toxicological Sciences

Abstract

Adult male and female B6C3F1 mice were exposed to perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) daily via gavage for 28 days (0, 0.005, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, or 5 mg/kg total administered dose [TAD]). Following exposure, various immune parameters were assessed and serum PFOS concentrations were determined. Lymphocyte proliferation was not altered in either gender. Natural killer cell activity was increased compared with control at 0.5, 1, and 5 mg/kg TAD in male mice but was not altered in female mice. At these treatment levels, splenic T-cell immunophenotypes were minimally altered in females, but all T-cell subpopulations were significantly modulated in males beginning at 0.1 mg/kg TAD. The sheep red blood cell (SRBC) plaque-forming cell (PFC) response was suppressed in male mice beginning at 0.05 mg/kg TAD and in females at 0.5 mg/kg TAD. Serum trinitrophenyl (TNP)-specific IgM titers were also decreased by PFOS after TNP-LPS (TNP conjugated to lipopolysacharide) challenge suggesting that the humoral immune effects may be attributed to the B-cell rather than T-cell because both T-dependent (SRBC) and T-independent (TI) (TNP-LPS) antigens result in suppressed IgM production. Based on the PFC response, the low observed effect level (LOEL) for males was 0.05 mg/kg TAD (ED(50) = 0.021 mg/kg TAD) and for females was 0.5 mg/kg TAD (ED(50) = 0.59 mg/kg TAD). Measured PFOS serum concentrations at these dose levels were 91.5 +/- 22.2 ng/g and 666 +/- 108 ng/g (mean +/- SD), respectively. The male LOEL serum level was approximately 14-fold lower than reported mean blood levels from occupationally exposed humans and fell in the upper range of concentrations reported for the general population. Overall, this study provides a profile of PFOS immunotoxicity showing effects at levels reported in humans and identifies the B-cells as a potential target.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/toxsci/kfn059

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Peden-Adams, M. M., Keller, J. M., EuDaly, J. G., Berger, J., Gilkeson, G. S., & Keil, D. E.
Venue
Toxicological Sciences
Published
2008-03-20
Volume
104
Issue
1
Pages
144-154
ISSN
  • 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-6080
OpenAlex
W2134883557
Cited by
277
References
6
FWCI
12.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.