Cited by 215Light effects on plantsPlant Molecular Biology ResearchPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms

RPT2 Is a Signal Transducer Involved in Phototropic Response and Stomatal Opening by Association with Phototropin 1 in Arabidopsis thaliana

Open access
Inada, Sayaka, Ohgishi, Maki, Mayama, Tomoko, Okada, Kiyotaka, Sakai, Tatsuya·2004·The Plant Cell

Abstract

Phototropin 1 (phot1) and phot2, which are blue light receptor kinases, function in blue light-induced hypocotyl phototropism, chloroplast relocation, and stomatal opening in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Previous studies have shown that the proteins RPT2 (for ROOT PHOTOTROPISM2) and NPH3 (for NONPHOTOTROPIC HYPOCOTYL3) transduce signals downstream of phototropins to induce the phototropic response. However, the involvement of RPT2 and NPH3 in stomatal opening and in chloroplast relocation mediated by phot1 and phot2 was unknown. Genetic analysis of the rpt2 mutant and of a series of double mutants indicates that RPT2 is involved in the phot1-induced phototropic response and stomatal opening but not in chloroplast relocation or phot2-induced movements. Biochemical analyses indicate that RPT2 is purified in the crude microsomal fraction, as well as phot1 and NPH3, and that RPT2 makes a complex with phot1 in vivo. On the other hand, NPH3 is not necessary for stomatal opening or chloroplast relocation. Thus, these results suggest that phot1 and phot2 choose different signal transducers to induce three responses: phototropic response of hypocotyl, stomatal opening, and chloroplast relocation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1105/tpc.019901

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RPT2 is localized to the plasma membrane and forms a complex with PHOT1 and NPH3 in vivo.

    “RPT2 is localized to the plasma membrane and forms a complex with PHOT1 and NPH3 in vivo (Inada et al., 2004).”

    From The action of enhancing weak light capture via phototropic growth and chloroplast movement in plants (2022) · cites this paper as Inada et al., 2004

    In “RPT2 Makes a Complex with phot1 in Vivo” (page unavailable), RPT2 is found in a crude microsomal fraction that includes the plasma membrane, and phot1 is co-immunoprecipitated with RPT2. That fractionation does not establish plasma-membrane localization specifically. The section explicitly says that interaction with NPH3 in vivo was not observed; RPT2–NPH3 binding was shown in yeast, not as part of an in-vivo complex. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • NPH3, RPT2, and PKS1 interact with PHOT1 and participate in the regulation of hypocotyl phototropism.

    “Interaction screening revealed that NPH3, RPT2, and PKS1 interact with PHOT1 and participate in the regulation of hypocotyl phototropism (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999; Harper et al., 2000; Inada et al., 2004).”
  • Low-fluence blue light can induce phototropism in rpt2 mutants but the phototropism gradually weakens with increasing blue light, indicating that RPT2 promotes phototropism in Arabidopsis under blue light.

    “Low-fluence blue light can induce phototropism in rpt2 mutants but the phototropism gradually weakens with increasing blue light, indicating that RPT2 promotes phototropism in Arabidopsis under blue light (Sakai et al., 2000; Inada et al., 2004).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inada, S., Ohgishi, M., Mayama, T., Okada, K., & Sakai, T.
Affiliations
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • RIKEN Plant Science Center, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Venue
The Plant Cell
Published
2004-03-18
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
887-896
ISSN
  • 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-298X
OpenAlex
W2156376904
Cited by
215
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
19.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Plant Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Keywords
Rpt2, phototropin 1, phototropin 2, stomatal opening, blue light signaling, signal transduction, NPH3, Arabidopsis thaliana
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Chloroplasts, Eye Proteins, Flavoproteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Recombinant Proteins, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression, Genes, Plant, Arabidopsis, Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate, Phototropism, DNA, Plant, Two-Hybrid System Techniques, Arabidopsis Proteins, Drosophila Proteins, Plants, Genetically Modified, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Macromolecular Substances, Cryptochromes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review